Advertisement

Revolutionary Critical Pedagogy: The Struggle against the Oppression of Neoliberalism—A Conversation with Peter McLaren

  • Sebastjan Leban
  • Peter McLaren
Chapter
  • 324 Downloads
Part of the Marxism and Education book series (MAED)

Abstract

Sebastjan Leban: On your webpage you state that critical pedagogy, which you support and practice, advocates nonviolent dissent, the development of a philosophy of praxis guided by a Marxist humanism, the study of revolutionary social movements and thought, and the struggle for socialist democracy, which is diametrically opposite to the current neoliberal democracy. Can we say that you as a critical educator are basically leading a fight against neoliberal global capitalism valorization of education?

Keywords

Conceptual System Objective Truth Bush Administration Class Struggle Socialist Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Dussel, Enrique. (1985). Philosophy of Liberation. New York: Orbis.Google Scholar
  2. Eagleton, Terry. (1996). The Illusions of Postmodernism. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell, p. 118Google Scholar
  3. Ebert, Teresa. (In press). Cultural Critique (With an Attitude). Champaign, Illinois. University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  4. Ebert, Teresa, and Zavarzadeh, M.s’ud. (2008). Class in Culture. Boulder and London: Paradigm Press.Google Scholar
  5. Grosfoguel, Ramon. (2005). “The implications of subaltern epistemologies for global capitalism: Transmodernity, border thinking, and global colo-niality”. In R.P. Applebaum and W.I. Robinson (eds.). Critical Globalization Studies (pp. 283–292). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Grzinic, Marina. (2008). De-linking epistemology from capital and pluriver-sality—a conversation with Walter Mignolo, Part 1. Reartikulacija, no. 4, Summer. Retrieved from http://www.reartikulacija.org/dekolonizacija/ dekolonialnost4_ENG.html.
  7. Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich and Wallace, W.lliam. (1971). Hegel Philospohy of Mind. USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hoffman, John. (1975). Marxism andthe Theory of Praxis. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  9. Hudis, P. (2000). Can capital be controlled? News & Letters Online, at http://www.newsandletters.Org/Issues/2000/April/4.00_essay.htm
  10. Hudis, P. (2005). “Marx’s critical appropriation and transcendence of Hegel’s theory of alienation”. A paper delivered to a session on “Alternatives to Capitalism” in the Left Forum in New York City, March 2005.Google Scholar
  11. Hudis, P. (2008). Hegel’s phenomenology today: a Marxist-humanist view. News & Letters, December, 2007-January, 2008.Google Scholar
  12. Kain, Philip J. (2005). Hegel and the Other: A Study of the Phenomenology of Spirit. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  13. Malik, Kenan. (1997). “The mirror of race: postmodernism and the celebration of difference”. In E.M. Wood and J. B. Foster (eds.). In Defense of History: Marxism and the Postmodern Agenda (pp. 112–133). New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  14. Maldonado-Torres, Nelson. (2008). Against War: Views from the Underside of Modernity. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Michaels, Walter Benn. (2008). “Against diversity”. New Left Review-, 52, July-Au gust. As retrieved from: http://newleftreview.org/?page= article &view=2731.
  16. Mignolo Walter. (1987). The Darker Side of the Renaissance: Literacy, Territoriality and Colonization. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  17. Mignolo Walter. (1999). Local Histories/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges and Border Thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Mignolo Walter. (2005). The Idea of Latin America. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  19. Quijano, Anibal. (1993). ”‘Raza,’ ‘Etnia’ y ‘Naciön’ en Mariätegui: Cuestiones Abiertas” [Race, ethnicity and nation in Mariätegui: Open questions]. In R. Forgues (ed.). José Carlos Maridtguiy Europa: El Otro Aspecto del Descubrimiento (pp. 167–187). Lima, Peru: Empresa Editora Amauta S.A.Google Scholar
  20. Quijano, Anibal. (1998). “La colonialidad del poder y la experiencia cultural latino-americana” [The coloniality of power and the Latin America cultural experience]. In R. Briceno-Leön and H.R. Sonntag (eds.), Pueblo, época y desarrollo: la sociologia de America Latina (pp. 139–155). Caracas: Nueva Sociedad.Google Scholar
  21. Quijano, Anibal and Ennis, M.chael. (2000). Coloniality of power, ethno-centrism, and Latin America. NEPANTLA, I, 533–580.Google Scholar
  22. Quijano, A., and Waller stein, I. (1992). “Americanity as a concept, or the Americas in the modern worldsystem”. International Journal of Social Sciences, 134, 583–591.Google Scholar
  23. Retamar, Roberto Fernandez. (1989). Caliban and Other Essays. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sheila Macrine, Peter McLaren, and Dave Hill 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastjan Leban
  • Peter McLaren

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations