Advertisement

Taking on the Corporatization of Public Education: What Teacher Education Can Do

  • Pepi Leistyna
Chapter
Part of the Marxism and Education book series (MAED)

Abstract

Most citizens of the United States are unaware of the extent to which public schools are controlled by private interests such as publishing, food, and pharmaceutical companies, for-profit education management organizations, and corporate lobbyists (Kohn and Shannon, 2002; Molnar, 2005; Molnar et al., 2006; Saltman, 2000, 2005). The stealth onslaught of privatization and commercialization of this vital institution should come as no surprise given that education reform over the past few decades has been masterminded, in large part, behind closed doors, by a handful of corporate executives, politicians, and media moguls who have already profited handsomely from the over six hundred billion dollars a year education industrial complex (Bacon, 2000; Gluckman, 2002; Humes, 2003; Miner, 2005; Olson, 2005; Rees, 2000).

Keywords

Public School Teacher Education Program Charter School National Reading Panel Texas Education Agency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allington, R. (2002). Biß Brother and the National Reading Curriculum: How Ideology Trumped Evidence. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  2. Bacon, D. (2000). School testing: Good for textbook publishers, bad for students. Pacific News Service. Available at http://alternet.org/ story/39/
  3. Bacon, D. (2001). The trouble with the test. Students. Available at http://dbacon.igc.org/Students/04TheTest.htm.
  4. Bennett, W. (1993). Book of Virtues: A Treasury of Great Moral Stories. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  5. Clark, B. (2004). Leaving children behind: Exam privatization threatens public schools. CorpWatch. Available at http://www.corpwatch.org/ article.php ?id= 1154 3.
  6. CNN Presents. (2005). High stakes. Cable News Network Inc. Lanham, MD: CNN.Google Scholar
  7. CNN.com (2005). Bennett under fire for comments on blacks, Crime. Available at /search>q=cache:MEhjtC3_OI4J:www.cnn.com/2 0 0 5/POLITICS/0 9/3 0/bennett. comment s/+Bill+Bennett, +the+former+ Secretary+of+Education&hl= en&gl=us&ct= clnk&cd= 1.Google Scholar
  8. Coles, G. (2000). Misreading Reading: The Bad Science that Hurts Children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  9. Committee on Education and the Workforce: U.S. House of Representatives (1999). Statement of Edward B. Rust, Jr., Chairman and CEO of State Farm Insurance Companies; Committee on Education and the Workforce: U.S. House of Representatives on “Business Issues in elementary and Secondary Education”. Available at http://www.house.gov/ed_workforce/hearings/106th/fc/esea7199/rust.htm.
  10. EairTest: The National Center for Fair and Open Testing (2006). The case against high-stakes testing. Available at http://www.fairtest.org/arn/ caseagainst.html.
  11. Forbes.com (2006). Round-up Pearson FY profit climbs. Available at http://www.forbes.com/markets/feeds/afx/2006/02/27/afx2555308.html. Fortune. (2006). Fortune 500. Available at http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune500/
  12. France, M., and Osterland, A. (1999). State Farm: What’s happening to the good neighbor? Judges and juries have found the insurer guilty of serious misconduct. Business Week Online. Available at http://www.businessweek.com/1999/99_45/b3654189.htm.
  13. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  14. Frontline. (2006). The testing industry’s big four. Available at http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/schools/testing/companies.html.
  15. Gluckman, A. (2002). Testing… testing… one, two three: The commercial side of the standardized-testing boom. Dollars & Sense: The Magazine of Economic Justice. Available at http://www.dollarsandsense.org/ archives/2 002/010 2gluckm an.html.
  16. Haney, W. (2000). The Texas miracle in education: Missing students and other mirages. Education Policy Analysis Archives. Available at http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41/ and http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41/part5.htm.
  17. Hoffman, T. (2005). The Candid Bennett. eSchool News: Ed-Tech Insider. Available at http://www.eschoolnews.com/eti/2005/10/001190.php.
  18. Horn, J. (2005). Hauling away the Federal Treasury. Available at http://schoolsmatter.blogspot.com/2005/09/hauling-away-federal-treasury.html.
  19. Humes, E. (2003). Leave no test behind. Available at http://www.edwardhumes.com/archives/00000021. shtml.
  20. Kohn, A. (2000). The Case against Standardized Testing: Raising the Scores, Ruining the Schools. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  21. Kohn, A., and Shannon, P. (2002). Education, Inc. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  22. Lawrence, J. (2006). Congress full of fortunate sons—and other relatives. USA Today. Available at http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/ 2006–08-07-relatives — cover_x.htm.
  23. Leistyna, P. (1999). Presence of Mind: Education and the Politics of Deception. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  24. Leistyna, P. (2002). Defining and Designing Multiculturalism. Albany, NY: SUNY.Google Scholar
  25. McGraw-Hill. (2005). Report. Available at http://investor.mcgraw-hill.com/phoenk.zhtml?c=96562&p=irol-newsArticle&ID=70 0914 &highlight=.
  26. McGraw-Hill. (2006). Report. Available at http://investor.mcgraw-hill.com/ phoenix. zhtml?c=96562&p = irol-newsArticle&ID = 885916 & highlight=.
  27. McNeil, L. (2000). Contradictions of School Reform: Educational Costs of Standardized Testing. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  28. Metcalf, S. (2002). Reading between the Lines. The Nation. Available at http://www.fairtest.org/nattest/Nation%20piece%20bush%201inks. html.
  29. Mickelson, RA. (2006). International Business Machinations: A case study of corporate involvement in local educational reform. Teachers College Ä r AvaikibleatError! Hyperlink reference not valid. uncc.edu/rmicklsn/images/corporate.pdf+New+American+Schools+De velopment+Corporation,+initially+funded+by+IBM+CEO+Louis+Gerst ner&hl=en&gl=u s &ct= clnk&cd= 1.Google Scholar
  30. Miner, B. (2005). Keeping public schools public: Testing companies mine for gold. Rethinking Schools. Available at http://www.rethinkingschools.org/archive/19_02/test192.shtml.
  31. Molnar, A. (2005). School Commercialism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Molnar, A., Garcia, D., Bartlett, M., and O’Neill, A. (2006). Profiles of for-profit education management organizations 2005–2006. Education Policy Research Unit. Available at http://www.asu.edu/educ/epsl/ CERU/Documents/EPSL-0605–104-CERU.pdf.
  33. Ohanian, S. (2006). Grant to Bennett’s K12 Inc. Challenged. Available at http://www.susanohanian.org/atrocity_fetch.php?id=2910.
  34. Olson, D. (2005). Testing companies score big profits. Minnesota Public Radio. Online at http://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/ features/2005/04/18_olsond_testingagain/ Accessed November 5, 2007.
  35. Pearson. (2005). Report. Available at www.pearson.com/index. cfm ?pageid= 151.
  36. Pearson.. (2006). Press Release: Pearson Enters Certification Market, Acquires National Evaluation Systems, America’s Leading Teacher Certification Testing Company. Available at http://www.pearsoned.com/pr_2006/ 042506.htm.
  37. Rees, M. (2000). Educational testing as a global industry. World Socialist Website. Available at http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/aug2000/ test-a22.shtml.
  38. Sacks, P. (2001). Standardized Minds: The High Trice of Americans Testing Culture emd What We Can Do to Change It. Boulder, CO: Perseus.Google Scholar
  39. Saltman, K. (2000). Collateral Damage. Boulder, CO: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  40. Saltman, K. (2005). The Edison Schools: Corporate Schooling and the Assault on Tublic Education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Scherer, M. (2001). That other Bush boy. Mother Jones. Available at http://www.motherjones.com/news/outfront/2 001/0 5/neilbush.htm1.
  42. Sixty Minutes II. (2004). The “Texas Miracle”. CBS News. Available at www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/06/60II/main591676.shtml.
  43. Sturrock, C. (2006). States Distort School Test Scores, Researchers Say. Critics Say California among Those that Lower Standards for No Child Left Behind. Chronicle, June 30. Available at http://www.sfgate.com/ cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/06/30/MNG28JN9RC1.DTL.
  44. Suchak, B. (2006). Standardized testing: High-Stakes for students and for corporate bottom lines. Available at http://www.nomoretests.com/ insider.htm.
  45. TC Reports. (2000). High-stakes testing and its effects on education. Teachers College. Available at http://www.tc.columbia.edu/news/article. htm?id=3811.
  46. Texas Education Agency. (2000). Press Release. Available at /search>q=cache:x6NRKCIx-BkJ:www.tea. state. tx.us/press/prO 004 07.html+students+in+texas+take+TAAS&hl=en&gl= us&ct=clnk&cd=1.Google Scholar
  47. Texas NAACP. (1995). TAAS Resolution Commitment.Google Scholar
  48. The Homeschool Place.com (2006). X U.S. Secretary of Education Bill Bennett and President Bush’s Brother Neil Bush. Available at http://www.edu-cyberpg.com/Culdesac/billbennett.html.

Copyright information

© Sheila Macrine, Peter McLaren, and Dave Hill 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pepi Leistyna

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations