Abstract
Written with Irishman Pat Magee’s voice in his head, Beckett composes Krapp’s Last Tape in seven succinct stages in March 1958. In this chapter I will discuss the unfolding of Beckett’s drafts of Krapp’s Last Tape to argue that he embellishes each succeeding version to include more personal details of his Irish Protestant childhood and young adulthood; once again, the return to personal memories shows that Beckett remains possessed by a dispossession of masculine national identity. This play not only focuses on Beckett’s experience of Anglo-Ireland, but also presents in fictionalized form Beckett’s 1945 epiphany to work with loss and disintegration. As Nora suggests, memory is capricious and ever in the present in our lives, so much so that it is impossible to control the memory as it “takes root in the concrete, in spaces, gestures, images, and objects.” With Krapp’s Last Tape Beckett renews his preoccupation with masculinity and his own past with the figure of Krapp who, through subsequent versions of the initial text, slowly turns into a composite of an Irish Protestant male who is contemporaneous with Beckett. While we have noted that Beckett’s work up through the 1950s continually returns to memories and issues of a displaced masculinity, with the character Krapp, Beckett aberrantly creates an overtly masculine and sexually successful male.
Memory is a perpetually actual phenomenon, a bond tying us to the eternal present; history is a representation of the past. Memory … nourishes recollections that may be out of focus or telescopic, global or detached, particular or symbolic—responsive to each avenue of conveyance or phenomenal screen, to every censorship or projection …. Memory takes root in the concrete, in spaces, gestures, images, and objects …. Memory is absolute, while history can only conceive the relative.
Pierre Nora1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Nora, “Between Memory and History,” Representations 26 (1989), 8–9.
James Knowlson, ed. The Theatrical Notebooks of Samuel Beckett: Krapp’s Last Tape (London: Faber and Faber, 1992), xxvii.
Samuel Beckett, Murphy (New York: Grove, 1957), 27.
Sue Wilson, “Krapp’s Last Tape and the Mania in Manichaeism,” Beckett Today/ Aujourd’hui (2002), 12, 131.
Wilhelm Windelband, History of Philosophy. Trans. James H. Tufts (New York: Macmillan, 1910), 239–240.
Ibid., 589, who quotes Enoch Brater, “Dada, Surrealism, and the Genesis of Not I,” Modern Drama 18 (1975), 50, is one of many references to Beckett’s experience in El Jadida. The Beckett Collection at Reading contains correspondence from Beckett to Jocelyn Herbert and Ruby Cohn in regard to witnessing this woman in El Jadida. Anne Atik states that Beckett: “After his return from Morocco, he told us about a figure sitting absolutely still while apparently listening to something or someone in El Jadida. He then chose to reverse the composition for the play: inspired by the immobile posture of the A rab woman, he placed the indifferent Onlooker on the left a nd the mout h on the right” (6).
Abdul R. JanMohamed, Manichean Aesthetics (Amherst: University of Massachusetts P, 1983), 264.
Copyright information
© 2009 Jennifer M. Jeffers
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jeffers, J.M. (2009). Rewinding Krapp’s Last Tape: The Return of Anglo-Irish Masculinity. In: Beckett’s Masculinity. New Interpretations of Beckett in the Twenty-first Century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101463_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101463_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37905-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10146-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)