Skip to main content
  • 106 Accesses

Abstract

Similar to Simone de Beauvoir’s perspective that the masculine is universal, Wittig attributes to masculinity a kind of transparency; we have always looked at the world as masculine; in fact, we have looked through this transparency as if it were natural. In regard to masculinity, Beckett scholars, too, have looked through Beckett’s texts as universal and transparent.

Gender is the linguistic index of the political opposition between the sexes. Gender is used here in the singular because indeed there are not two genders. There is only one: the feminine, the “masculine” not being a gender. For the masculine is not the masculine, but the general.

Monique Wittig1

At the core of these stories, I would suggest, is thus a kind of double telling, the oscillation between a crisis of death and the correlative crisis of life: between the story of the unbearable nature of an event and the story of the unbearable nature of its survival.

Cathy Caruth2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Monique Wittig, “The Point of View: Universal or Particular?” Feminist Issues 3.2 (1983), 64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cathy Caruth, Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, and History (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins U P, 1996), 7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R.W. Connell, Masculinities (Berkeley/Los Angeles: U of California P, 1995), 78.

    Google Scholar 

  4. John MacInnes, The End of Masculinity (Buckingham: OUP, 1998), 77.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Susan Bordo, “Reading the Male Body,” The Male Body: Features, Destinies, Exposures, ed. Laurence Goldstein (Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1994), 265.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Antony Easthope, What a Man’s Gotta Do: The Masculine Myth in Popular Culture (Boston: Unwin Hyman, 1990), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vivian Mercier, Beckett/Beckett (Oxford: Oxford UP, 1977), x.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jack White, The Minority Report: The Protestant Community in the Irish Republic (Dublin: Gill and Macmillan, 1975), 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Michael McConville, Ascendancy to Oblivion: The Story of the Anglo-Irish (London: Quartet Books, 1986), 262. I will discuss Anglo-Irish masculine complicity at length in chapter 1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mary Bryden, Women in Samuel Beckett’s Prose and Drama (London: Macmillan, 1993), 7.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. J.C.C. Mays, “Mythologized Presences: Murphy in Its Time,” Myth and Reality in Irish Literature, ed. Joseph Ronsley (Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier U P, 1977), 216.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See especially Ruby Cohn, Samuel Beckett: The Comic Gamut (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers UP, 1962), 70.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Jennifer M. Jeffers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jeffers, J.M. (2009). Introduction. In: Beckett’s Masculinity. New Interpretations of Beckett in the Twenty-first Century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101463_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics