Abstract
In this chapter I start out from the idea that a part of Russian nationalism, usually defined as radical nationalism, ultranationalism, the extreme right, extremism, and so forth, can be more rigorously defined as extra-parliamentary. All attempts to classify these nationalist movements according to doctrine seem to me to be doomed to failure. While it is possible to specify the singularity of each movement through its unique combination of ideological elements and the political trajectory of its leader over the last 20 years, it is difficult, if not impossible, to place them systematically using global criteria such as right/left or ethnonationalism/imperialism. In theory all the conceptual combinations are possible, which means that neither the choice of political regime (monarchism or republicanism), the conception of nationhood (culturalist or racialist), nor the special focus or otherwise on the Jewish question or on religious beliefs (Orthodox, neopagan, or indiffèrent) enable any meaningful classification. Moreover, the development of new, less ideological forms of radie ality with more developed social bases has slowly rendered such classifications inappropriate, signaling a new phase in the evolution of extra-parliamentary politics in Russia. Finally, some political parties and politicians in power espouse doctrines that are just as radical as those evoked here, but they have an acquired legitimacy that enables them to escape being classified as extremists.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
For more details, see M. Laruelle, “Rethinking Russian Nationalism: Historical Continuity, Political Diversity, and Doctrinal Fragmentation”, in M. Laruelle (ed.), Russian Nationalism and the National Reassertion of Russia (London: Routledge, 2009), pp. 13–48.
S. Hanson, C. Williams, “National Socialism, Left Patriotism or Superimperialism? The ‘Radical Right’ in Russia”, in S. Ramet (ed.), The Radical Right in Eastern Europe (University Park: Penn State Press, 1999), pp. 257–277.
G. M. Hahn, “Opposition Politics in Russia”, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 46, no. 2 (1994), pp. 305–335.
S. Lebedev, Russkie idei i russkoe delo: Natsional’no-patrioticheskoe dvizhenie v Rossii v proshlom i nastoiashchem (Saint Petersburg: Aleteiia, 2007), pp. 365–387.
A. Lebed’, Za detzhavu obidno (Kirov: Viatskoe slovo, 1995), p. 338.
See the listings in A. Verkhovskii, V. Pribylovskii, Natsional-patrioticheskie organizatsii v Rossii (Moscow: Panorama, 1996)
A. Verkhovskii, A. Papp, V. Pribylovskii, Politicheskii ekstremizm v Rossii (Moscow: Panorama, 1996).
A. Verkhovskii, E. Mikhailovskaia, V. Pribylovskii, Poliücheskaia ksenofobiia: Radikal’nyegruppy, predstavleniia liderov, rol’ tserkvi (Moscow: Panorama, 1999), pp. 243–246
V. Likhachev, Natsizm v Rossii (Moscow: Panorama, 2002), pp. 142–143.
V. Shnirel’man, “Les Nouveaux Aryens et l’antisémitisme: D’un faux manuscrit au racisme aryaniste”, in M. Laruelle (ed.), Le Rouge et le noir. Extrême droite et nationalisme en Russie (Paris: CNRS-Editions, 2007), pp. 189–224.
T. Parland, “Russia in the 1990s: Manifestations of a Conservative Backlash Philosophy”, in C. J. Chulos, T. Piirainen (eds.), The Fall of an Empire, the Birth of a Nation: National Identities in Russia (Burlington: Ashgate, and Helsinki: University of Helsinki, 2000), pp. 116–140.
A. Verkhovskii, A. Papp, V. Pribylovskii, Politicheskii ekstremizm v Rossii (Moscow: Panorama, 1996), p. 241.
W. D. Jackson, “Fascism, Vigilantism, and the State: The Russian National Unity Movement”, Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 46, no. 1 (1999), pp. 34–42.
V. Shnirel’man, “ChisüVshchiki moskovskikh ulits”. Skinkhedy, SMI i ohshchestvennoe mnenie (Moscow: Academia, 2007), p. 89.
A. Rogachevski, A Biographical and Critical Study of Russian Writer Eduard Limonov (Lewiston-New York: Edwin Meilen Press, Studies in Slavic Language and Literature 20, 2003).
On Eurasianism, see M. Laruelle, Russian Eurasianism: An Ideology of Empire (Washington, D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Press/Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008).
In spring 1997, Eduard Limonov initially supported the Cossack groups of Kokchetau who were trying to proclaim North Kazakhstan’s autonomy, then seems to have played an ambiguous role in the attempted separatist coup d’état that took place in 1999 in the Kazakhstani Altay Cf. M. Laruelle, S. Peyrouse, Les Russes au Kazakhstan. Identités nationales et nouveaux Etats dans Vespace post-soviétique (Paris: Maisonneuve & Larose, 2004), pp. 227–229.
V. Shnirel’man, ‘Tsepnoi pes rosy’: divannaia rasologiia kak zashchitnitsa ‘belogo cheloveka’ (Moscow: SOVA, 2007)
Nikolai Girenko, an ethnologist by training, headed the Commission for the Rights of Minorities in the Scientific Union of Saint Petersburg. In 2004 he published an expert’s handbook on this issue and was regularly summonsed to court to provide expertise in cases linked to racist crimes. See N. M. Girenko, Etnos, kul’tura, zakon (Saint Petersburg: Carillon, 2004).
V. Pribylovskii, G. Tochkin, “Natsional-patrioty na regional’nykh vyborakh v 2000–2005 gg.”, in M. Laruelle (ed.), Russkii natsionalizm v politicheskom prostranstve (issledovaniia po natsionalizmu) (Moscow: INION, French-Russian Center for Research in Human and Social Sciences, 2007), pp. 137–150.
A. Verkhovsky, “Political Commentary: Ultra-Nationalists in Russia at the Onset of Putin’s Rule”, Nationalities Papers, vol. 28, no. 4 (2000), pp. 707–722.
L. Back, “Aryans Reading Adorno: Cyber-Culture and Twenty-First Century Racism”, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 25, no. 4 (2002), pp. 628–651.
A. Tarasov, Natsi-skiny v sovremennoi Rossii (Moscow: Moskovskoe biuro po pravam cheloveka, 2004)
S. Stepanishchev, S. Charnyi, “O proiavleniiakh neonatsizma v strane, pobedivshei fashizm” (Moscow: Moskovskoe biuro po pravam cheloveka, 2005)
S. Belikov, Skinkhedy v Rossii (Moscow: Academia, 2005), p. 24.
M. Laruelle, “Alternative Identity, Alternative Religion? Neo-Paganism and the Aryan Myth in Contemporary Russia”, Nations and Nationalism, vol. 14, no. 2 (2008), pp. 283–301.
V. I. Mukomel’, E. A. Pain (eds.), Tolerantnost’ protiv ksenofobii. Zarubezhnyi i rossiiskii opyt (Moscow: Academia, 2005), p. 140.
G. Kozhevnikova, Radikal’nyi natsionalizm v Rossii i protivodeistvie emu v 2006 g. (Moscow: SOVA, 2006)
G. Kozhevnikova, Radikal’nyi natsionalizm v Rossii: proiavleniia i protivodeistviia: Obzor sobytiia 2004 goda (Moscow: SOVA, 2004)
E. Pain, “Dinamika etnopoliticheskogo ekstremizma”, in V. Tishkov, E. Fillipova (eds.), Etnich-eskaia situatsiia i konflikty v gosudarstvakh SNG i Baltii: Ezhegodnyi doklad Seti etnopoliticheskogo monitoringa i rannego preduprezhdeniia konfliktov (Moscow: Institut etnologii i antropologii, 2004), pp. 19–30.
A. Verkhovskii, Antiekstremistskoe zakonodatel’stvo i ego primenenie (Moscow: SOVA, 2007)
The decision of the Russian Supreme Court was based on “evidence” of help given by the Hizb ut-Tahrir to the Chechen separatists. Since then, several of the movement’s militants, or those considered to be such, have been arrested. They claim they have been sentenced for their religious convictions. The association for the Defense of Human Rights Memorial met with judicial troubles in 2005 for having published on its Web site a text from the mufti of the Muslim Spiritual Board of Asian Russia, Nafigulla Ashirov, who was explaining that the speeches of Hizb ut-Tahrir did not contain a call for violence. See A. Verkhovskii, “Iavliaetsia-li Hizb ut-Tahrir ekstremistskoi organizatsii?”, in A. Verkhovskii (ed.), Tsena nenavisti (Moscow: SOVA, 2005), pp. 92–110.
In 2005, eight adolescents were sentenced to from four to ten years in prison for the assassination of two Tajiks and an Uzbek in Volgograd. In December of the same year, invoking Article 282, two Saint Petersburg courts charged members of skinhead movements Schultz-88 and Mad Crowd for having attacked foreign citizens. S. Golunov, “Hitler’s Cause Is Alive in Former Stalingrad”, PONARS Policy Memo no. 408 (Washington, D.C.: CSIS, 2006)
D. Dubrovskii, “’Chto s nauchnoi tochki zreniia ponimaetsia.…’ Ili kak eksperty delaiut ksenofobiiu naukoi”, in A. Verkhovsky (ed.), Russkii natsionalizm: ideologiia i nastroenie (Moscow: SOVA, 2006), pp. 122–138.
M. Varga, “How Political Opportunities Strengthen the Far Right: Understanding the Rise in Far-Right Militancy in Russia”, Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 60, no. 4 (2008), pp. 561–579.
S. D. Shenfield, Russian Fascism. Traditions, Tendencies, Movements (New York-London: M. E. Sharpe, 2001), p. 190
Copyright information
© 2009 Marlène Laruelle
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laruelle, M. (2009). Nationalism as Opposition: The Extra-parliamentary Camp. In: In the Name of the Nation. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101234_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230101234_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38117-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10123-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)