Advertisement

Action Research for Curriculum Internationalization: Education versus Commercialization

  • Robin McTaggart
  • Gina Curró

Abstract

Participatory action research (PAR), more than a research methodology (Carr, 2006), brings people together to reflect and act on their own social practices to make them more coherent, just, rational, informed, satisfying, and sustainable. PAR involves groups of people working together on a thematic concern (Kemmis & McTaggart, 1988) that arises in their practice. Kemmis and McTaggart (2005) described public spheres, where people gather to develop shared understandings about the issues they confront and how to address them. It is not usually research per se that engages people, but working together, changing their practice in informed and responsible ways, developing concepts for discussing their work and collaborating differently with colleagues.

Keywords

International Student Social Practice Public Sphere Participatory Action Research Political Life 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altbach, P. G. (1991). Patterns in higher education development. Prospects, 21(2), 189–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aulakh, G., Brady, P., Dunwoodie, K., Perry, J., Roff, G., & Steward, M. (1997). Internationalising the curriculum across RMIT University. Melbourne: RMIT.Google Scholar
  3. Avis, J. (2005). Beyond performativity: Reflections on activist professionalism and the labour process in further education. Journal of Education Policy, 20(2), 209–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: SRHE and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Birrell, R. (2006). Implications of low English standards among overseas students at Australian universities. People and Place, 14(4), 53–65.Google Scholar
  6. Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (Eds.). (2001). Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. St Ives, UK: Clays.Google Scholar
  7. Bretag, T. (2007). The emperor’s new clothes: Yes, there is a link between English language competence and academic standards. People and Place, 15(1), 13–22.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, R. (2007, July). Can quality assurance survive the market? Keynote address to the Australian Universities Quality Forum. Hobart, Australia. Retrieved from http://www.auqa.edu.au/auqf/2007/proceedings/index.htm.
  9. Butorac, A. (1997). Quality in practice. Internationalising the curriculum in the classroom. Curtin Western Australia: Curtin University.Google Scholar
  10. Cargill, M., Cadman, K., & McGowan, U. (2001). Postgraduate writing: Using intersecting genres in a collaborative, content-based program. In I. Leki (Ed.), Academic writing programs. Case studies in TESOL practice series (pp. 85–96). New York: TESOL.Google Scholar
  11. Carr, W. (2006). Philosophy, methodology and action research. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(4), 421–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Education, knowledge and action research. London: Falmer.Google Scholar
  13. Fals-Borda, O. (1979). Investigating reality in order to transform it: The Colombian experience. Dialectical Anthropology, 4, 33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fals-Borda, O. (1989). Investigating reality in order to change it. [Videotape]. Calgary: University of Calgary Com/Media.Google Scholar
  15. Freire, P. (1982). Creating alternative research methods: Learning to do it by doing it. In B. Hall, A. Gillette, & R. Tandon (Eds.), Creating knowledge: A monopoly? (pp. 29–37). New Delhi: Society for Participatory Research in Asia.Google Scholar
  16. Fullan, M. (1989). The new meaning of educational change. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  17. Giddens, A. (1990). Consequences of modernity. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Habermas, J. (1974). Theory and practice (Trans. John Viertel). London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  19. Habermas, J. (1987). Knowledge and human interests (Trans. Jeremy J. Shapiro). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  20. Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms (Trans. William Rehg). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Haarlov, V. (1997). National policies for the internationalization of higher education in Europe 1985–2000 (Case: Denmark). Stockholm: Hogskoleverket Studies, Hogskoleverket Agency for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  22. Hadot, P. (1995). Philosophy as a way of life (Ed. and Intro. Arnold I. Davidson, Trans. Michael Chase). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Ho, D., & Chiu, C. (1994). Component ideas of individualism, collectivism, and social organisation: An application in the study of Chinese culture. In U. Kim, H. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. Choi, & G. Yoon. (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 137–156). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Hooper, M., Garnett, G., Walsh, L., Vicziany, M., Rizvi, F., & Webb, G. (1999). Internationalization of the Curriculum. Melbourne: Monash University (mimeo).Google Scholar
  25. IDP Education Australia (1995). Curriculum development for internationalization: Australian case studies and stocktake. Canberra: DEETYA.Google Scholar
  26. Keenoy, T. (2004). Facing inwards and outwards at once: The liminal temporalities of academic performativity. Time and Society, 14(2/3), 304–321.Google Scholar
  27. Kember, D. (2000). Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students. Higher Education, 40(1), 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kemmis, S. (2007, October). Action research as a practice-changing practice. Opening Address for the IV Congreso Internacional Sobre Investigación-Acción Participativa, University of Valladolid, Spain.Google Scholar
  29. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.). (1988). The action research planner (3rd ed., substantially revised), Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory action research. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.) (pp. 567–605). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory action research: Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. Denzin, & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.) (pp. 559–604). Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Kemmis, S., & Smith, T. J. (Eds.). (2008). Enabling praxis: Challenges for education. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  33. Leask, B. (2001). Bridging the gap: Internationalizing university curricula. Journal of Studies in International Education, 5(2), 100–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lindblad, S., & Popkewitz, T. S. (Eds.). (2004). Educational restructuring: International perspectives on travelling policies. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar
  35. Lindsay, B. (2008). Breaking university rules: Discipline and indiscipline past and present. Australian Universities Review, 50(1), 37–39.Google Scholar
  36. Marshall, J. D. (1999). Performativity: Lyotard and Foucault through Searle and Austin. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 18, 309–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. OECD. (1994). Education in a New International Setting: Curriculum Development for Internationalization—Guidelines for Country Case Study. Paris: OECD (CERI).Google Scholar
  38. Pusey, M. (1991). Economic rationalism in Canberra: A nation-building state changes its mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  40. Rapley, J. (2004). Globalization and inequality: Neoliberalism’s downward spiral. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  41. Rizvi, F. (2000). Internationalization of curriculum. Melbourne: RMIT University (mimeo).Google Scholar
  42. Rizvi, F. (2004). Globalisation and the dilemmas of Australian higher education. ACCESS Critical perspectives on communication, culture and policy studies, 23(2), 33–42.Google Scholar
  43. Schatzki, T. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schatzki, T. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical account of the constitution of social life and change. University Park: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  45. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students: A course for non-native speakers of English. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  48. Thornton, M. (2008). The retreat from the critical: Social science research in the corporatised university. Australian Universities Review, 50(1), 5–10.Google Scholar
  49. Vidovich, L., & Porter, P. (1999). Quality policy in Australian higher education of the 1990s: University perspectives. Journal of Education Policy, 14(6), 567–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Volet, S. (1999). Learning across cultures: Appropriateness of knowledge transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 625–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Watkins, D., & Biggs, J. (Eds.). (1996). The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences. Hong Kong: Central Printing Press.Google Scholar
  52. Watkins, D., & Biggs, J. (Eds.). (2001). Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives. Hong Kong: Central Printing Press.Google Scholar
  53. Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dip Kapoor and Steven Jordan 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin McTaggart
  • Gina Curró

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations