Abstract
The aforementioned joint statement reflected the atmosphere of U.S.-Mexican relations five days before September 11, 2001. The United States and Mexico were poised for a constructive shared future. President Bush and President Fox recognized that migration-related issues were critical to the neighboring countries’ prosperity and well-being. This opportunistic dialogue abruptly ceased, however, with the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. Indeed, the debate changed to one of securing America’s borders. Immigration policy is at or very near the center of America’s War on Terror, and the nearly 2,000-mile U.S.Mexico border has received myopic attention after 9/11. As a result, considerable immigration-related legislation has been passed in the name of national security, and significant amounts of money and resources have been spent, and will continue to be spent, on securing the U.S.-Mexico border. The government’s active response to 9/11 has resulted in both intended and unintended consequences.
… U.S.-Mexican relations have entered their most promising moment in history. Our governments are committed to seizing the opportunities before us in this new atmosphere of mutual trust. The depth, quality and candor of our dialogue is unprecedented. It reflects the democratic values we share and our commitment to move forward boldly as we deepen this authentic partnership of neighbors.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Raquel Aldana and Sylvia R. Lazos Vargas, “’ Aliens’ in Our Midst Post-9/11: Legislating Outsiderness within the Borders,” UC Davis Law Review 38 (2005): 1683
Kevin R. Johnson, “The Forgotten ‘Repatriation’ of Persons of Mexican Ancestry and Lessons for the ‘War on Terror’,” Pace Law Review 26 (2005): 1
Kevin R. Tohnson, The “HuddledMasses” Myth: Immigration and Civil Rights (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2004), 14.
Barbara Hines, “An Overview of U.S. Immigration Law and Policy since 9/11,” Texas Hispanic lournal of Law and Policy 12 (2006): 9
Susan Martin and Philip Martin, “International Migration and Terrorism: Prevention, Prosecution and Protection,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 18 (2004): 329
Guido Dorigo and Waldo Tobler, “Push-Pull Migration Laws,” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 73, no. 1 (March 1983): 1.
Elaine Levine, “From Precarious, Low-Paying Jobs in Mexico to Precarious, Low-Paying Jobs in the United States,” in The Politics, Economics, and Culture of Mexican-U.S. Migration: Both Sides of the Border, ed. Edward Ashbee, Helene Balslev Clausen, and Carl Pedersen (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 86–88.
Kevin R. Johnson and Bernard Trujillo, “Immigration Reform, National Security after September 11, andthe Future of North Americanlntegration,” Minnesota Law Review 91 (2007): 1369
Robert S. Leiken and Steven Brooke, “The Quantitative Analysis of Terrorism and Immigration: An Initial Exploration,” Terrorism and Political Violence 18, no. 4 (2006): 503–521.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Matthew J. Morgan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McCune, B.G., Soden, D.L. (2009). Regulating the Push and Pull of Migration in the Post-9/11 Era on the Southern Border. In: Morgan, M.J. (eds) The Impact of 9/11 and the New Legal Landscape. The Day that Changed Everything?. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230100053_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230100053_14
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-37528-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10005-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)