Skip to main content

Developing the Strategic Corporate Competency

  • Chapter
Strategic Thinking in Tactical Times

Part of the book series: Corporations in the Global Economy ((CGE))

  • 58 Accesses

Abstract

One of the issues discussed by the practitioners was why some companies are simply better at strategy development and execution than others. One could argue that the main culprit of a firm’s strategic failures is an inherent misunderstanding of companies’ competencies, capabilities, talent and abilities. Day makes an important point in that the most effective strategies are the result of management initiating a challenge to which business teams must think broadly to look for improvement or innovation.34 In Day’s view, the adaptive strategies or the process of adaptive planning often forces changes in managerial roles requiring traditional corporate strategies to become facilitators of the process or integrators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. R. Loveridge, ‘The Firm as Differentiator and Integrator of Network: Layered Communities of Practice and Discourse’, D. Faulkner and M. De Rond (ed.), Cooperative Strategies: Economics, Business and Organizational Issues, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000, p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Chaffee, ‘Three Models of Strategy’, Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 1985, pp. 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  3. M. Hammer, The Agenda: What Every Business Must do to Dominate the Decade, London: Random House, 2001, p. 252.

    Google Scholar 

  4. IBM’s Autonomic Computing Manifesto, Armonk — New York: International Business Machines Corporation, 2001, pp. 21–9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M. Porter, H. Takeuchi and M. Sakakibara, Can Japan Compete? Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 2000, p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  6. S. Godin, Survival is Not Enough: Zooming, Evolution, and the Future of Your Company, New York: Free Press, 2002, p. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jan Stiles, ‘Managing Strategic Alliances’ Success: Determining the Influencing Factors of Intent within Partnerships’, Jens Genefke and Frank McDonald (eds), Effective Collaborations: Managing the Obstacles to Success, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001, p. 41.

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Nalebuff and A. Brandenburger, Co-opetition, New York: Doubleday, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Work-out™ is a trademark of the General Electric Corporation. For more information, see D. Ulrich, S. Kerr and R. Ashkenas, The GE Work-Out: How to Implement GE’s Revolutionary Method for Busting Bureaucracy and Attacking Organizational Problems, McGraw-Hill Trade, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See M. Treacy and F. Wiersema, The Disciple of Market Leaders, London: HarperCollins, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See R. Pascal, Managing on the Edge: How Successful Companies Use Conflict to Stay Ahead, London: Viking, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Goold, A. Campbell and M. Alexander, Corporate Level Strategy: Creating Value in the Multibusiness Company, Chichester: Wiley, 1994, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Quinn and J. Voyer, ‘The Logic of Logical Incrementalism’, H. Mintzberg and J. Quinn (eds), Readings in the Strategy Process, London: Prentice Hall International, 1998, p. 109.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Koch, The Financial Times Guide to Strategy: How to Create and Deliver a Useful Strategy, London: Prentice Hall, 2000, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Keegan and J. Turner, ‘The Management of Innovation in Project-based Firms’, Long Range Planning, August 2002, 35(4), p. 383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. United States Geological Survey, Summary Report of the Workshop on Enhancing Integrated Science, Reston, Virginia, November 1998, available at http://www.usgs.gov/integrated_science/summary.html.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lt General Jay W. Kelley, Commander, Air University, 2025, Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama: Air University Press Educational Services Directorate College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education, 1996, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Deloitte Research, Managing Amid Uncertainty: New Thinking on How to Win in a Volatile World, New York: Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, 2001, pp. 4–12.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Major General William H. Riley, Jr, Leading from Behind: Sometimes the Best Role for an Advisor, Office of the Program Manager, Saudi Arabian National Guard, available at http://www.opmsang.sppn.af.mil/Newcomer’s_Handbook/NOC25a.htm, July 2003.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2004 Joseph A. DiVanna and François Austin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

DiVanna, J., Austin, F. (2004). Developing the Strategic Corporate Competency. In: DiVanna, J., Austin, F. (eds) Strategic Thinking in Tactical Times. Corporations in the Global Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230006089_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics