Skip to main content

Abstract

Much of the study of post-communist politics carried with it assumptions that over time these political systems would manifest increasing stability and predictability. While ‘transition’ implied change, and with it the importance of élite actors, uncertainty, and ‘windows of opportunity’, consolidation implied that once institutions were in place they would themselves begin to shape élite behaviour. Though the ‘consolidationists’ were often careful to stress that democratic reversals remained possible, that developments were not linear, and that consolidation operated at different levels over a time span lasting up to a generation,1 the very term ‘consolidation’ suggested that the complex elements and processes comprising a political system would somehow ‘solidify’, gradually becoming routine and institutionalised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Geoffrey Pridham, ‘Comparative Reflections on Democratisation in East-Central Europe: A Model of Post-communist Transformation?’ in Geoffrey Pridham and Attila Âgh eds, Prospects for Democratic Consolidation in East-Central Europe, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001, pp. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Richard I. Hofferbert, ‘Introduction: Party Structure and Performance in New and Old Democracies’, in Richard Hofferbert, ed., Parties and Democracy, Oxford: Blackwells (the Political Studies Association), 1998, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Pasquino, ‘Party Elites and Democratic Consolidation: Cross-national Comparison of Southern European Experience’ in Geoffrey Pridham, ed., Securing Democracy: Political Parties and Democratic Consolidation in Southern Europe, London: Routledge, 1990, p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Scott Mainwaring and Timothy R. Scully, ‘Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America’ in Scott Mainwaring and Timothy Scully, eds, Building Democratic Institutions. Party Systems in Latin America, Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1995, p. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Larry Diamond, ‘Introduction: In Search of Consolidation’ in Larry Diamond, Marc F. Plattner, Yun-han Chu, and Hung-mao Tien, eds, Consolidating the Third Wave of Democracies. Themes and Perspectives, Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997, pp. xxii–xxiv.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giovanni Sartori, Parties and Party Systems. A framework for analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976, vol. 1, pp. 21–2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maurizio Cotta, ‘Structuring the New Party Systems after the Dictatorship. Coalitions, Alliances, Fusions and Splits during the transition and Post-transition Stages’ in Geoffrey Pridham and Paul G. Lewis, eds, Stabilising Fragile Democracies. Comparing New Party Systems in Southern and Eastern Europe, London: Routledge, 1996, pp. 69–99.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Iván Szelény, Èva Fodor, and Eric Hanley, ‘Left Turn in Post-Communist Politics: Bringing Class Back In?’, East European Politics and Societies, vol. 11, no. 1, winter 1997, pp. 190–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alan Ware, Political Parties and Party Systems, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996, pp. 158–75.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Peter Mair, ‘Party Systems and Structures of Competition’ in Lawrence LeDuc, Richard Niemi and Pippa Norris, eds, Comparing Democracies. Elections and Voting in Global Perspective, London: Sage, 1996, pp. 89–105.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vello Pettai and Marcus Kreuzer, ‘Party Politics in the Baltic States: Social Bases and Institutional Context’, East European Politics and Societies, vol. 13, no. 1, winter 1999, p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Milan Zemko, ‘Political Parties and the Election System in Slovakia’ in Soňa Szomolányi and Grigorij Mesežnikov, eds, The Slovak Path of Transitionto Democracy?, Bratislava: Slovak Political Science Association & Interlingua, 1994, pp. 40–55.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Neil Robinson, ‘Classifying Russia’s Party System: The Problem of “Relevance” in a Time of Uncertainty’, The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, vol. 14, nos 1/2, 1998, pp. 159–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Taagepera and M. Laakso, ‘“Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to Western Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 12, no. 1, April 1979, pp. 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Algis Krupavičius, ‘Party Systems in Central East Europe: Dimensions of Social Stability’ in Dirk Berg-Schlosser and Raivo Vetik, eds, Perspectives on Democratic Consolidation in Central and Eastern Europe, Boulder: East European Monographs, 2001, p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Karen Dawisha and Stephen Deets, ‘Intended and Unintended Consequences of Elections in Russia and Postcommunist States’, unpublished paper, 31 March 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alan Siaroff’s compendium, Comparative European Party Systems, New York: Garland Publishing, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  18. David Olson, ‘Party Formation and Party System Consolidation in the New Democracies of Central Europe’ in Richard Hofferbert, ed., Parties and Democracy, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 1998, pp. 37–8.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sarah Birch, ‘Electoral Systems and Party Systems in Europe East and West’ in Paul Lewis and Paul Webb, eds, Pan-European Perspectives on Party Politics, Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2003, p. 14–15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Darina Malová, ‘Slovakia’, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 26, no. 3–4, 1994, pp. 413–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. David Judge and Gabriella Ilonszki, ‘Member-Constituency Linkages in the Hungarian Parliament’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. XX, no. 2, May 1995, pp. 161–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. David Arter, Parties and Democracy in the Post-Soviet Republics: The Case of Estonia, Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1996, p. 178.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Attila Ágh, ‘The Parliamentarization of the East Central European Parties: Party Discipline in the Hungarian Parliament, 1990–1996’ in Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell and Richard M. Katz, eds, Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 1999, p. 172.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Darina Malová and Kevin Deegan Krause, ‘Parliamentary Party Groups in Slovakia’ in Knut Heidar and Ruud Koole, eds, Parliamentary Party Groups in European Democracies. Political Parties Behind Closed Doors, London: Routledge, 2000, p. 199, 203.

    Google Scholar 

  25. David Olson, ‘The New Parliaments of New Democracies: The Experience of the Federal Assembly of the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic’ in Attila Ágh, ed., The Emergence of East Central European Parliaments: The First Steps, Budapest: Hungarian Centre of Democracy Studies, 1994, p. 39.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sarah Whitmore, ‘Fragmentation or Consolidation? Parties in Ukraine’s Parliament’, Paper presented to the Annual Conference of the British Association for Slavonic and East European Studies, Fitzwilliam College, Cambridge, April 2002, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tivadar Pártay, quoted in Mark Pittaway and Nigel Swain, ‘Hungary’ in Bogdan Szajkowski, ed., Political Parties of Eastern Europe, Russia and the successor States, Harlow: Longman Information and Reference, 1994, p. 231.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Darina Malová, ‘The National Council of the Slovak Republic: Between Democratic Transition and National State-Building’, Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, 1996, p. 115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Terry D. Clark, Stacy Holscher, and Lisa Hyland, ‘The LDLP Faction in the Lithuanian Seimas, 1992–96’, Nationalities Papers, vol. 27, no. 2, June 1999, p. 232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Robertas Pogorelis, ‘Votes and Parties in the Mixed Electoral System in Lithuania’, draft PhD thesis, University of Essex, March 2003, p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jūrate Novágrockienė, ‘Elections to the Seimas 2000: Party System Evolution or Its Transformation?’ in Algimantas Jankauskas, ed., Lithuanian Political Science Yearbook 2000, Vilnius: Institute of International Relations and Political Science, 2001, pp. 146–8.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Marko Bojcun, ‘The Ukrainian Parliamentary Elections in March–April 1994’ Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 47, no. 2, March 1995, p. 231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Thomas F. Remington, The Russian Parliament. Institutional Evolution in a Transitional Regime, 1989–1999, New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001, pp. 178–80, 192.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Nadia Diuk and Myroslava Gongadze, ‘Post-Election Blues in Ukraine’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 13, no. 4, 2002, p. 160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Andy Wilson, ‘Ukraine’s 2002 Elections: Less Fraud. More virtuality’, East European Constitutional Review, vol. 11, no. 3, summer 2002, p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Taras Kuzio, ‘Loser Takes All: Ukrainian President Coopts Parliament’, RFE/RL Newsline, vol. 6, no. 100, Part I, 30 May 2002 (Endnote).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Alvidas Lukosaitis, ‘The Context of Parliamentary Elections 2000: The Experience and Perspectives of Coalition Politics in Lithuania’ in Algimantas Jankauskas, ed., Lithuanian Political Science Yearbook 2000, Vilnius: Institute of International Relations and Political Science, 2001, p. 159.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Peter Lebovič discusses the political manipulation of the amended electoral law in Peter Lebovič, ‘Political Aspects of the Election Law Amendments’ in Martin Bútora, Grigorij Mesežnikov, Zora Bútorová and Sharon Fisher, eds, The 1998 Parliamentary Elections and Democratic Rebirth in Slovakia, Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs, 1999, pp. 155–67.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Karen Henderson, ‘Problems of Democratic Consolidation in the Slovak Republic’, Society and Economy in Central and Eastern Europe, no. 3, 1999, pp. 159–60.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Alexander Kynev, ‘ The Role of Russia’s Political Parties in Russia’s 2002 Regional Elections’, Russia and Eurasia Review, vol. 2, issue 8, 15 April 2003, available at http://www.jamestown.org/authors/rer_alexander_kynev.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Anna Grzymala-Busse, Redeeming the Communist Past. The Regeneration of Communist Parties in East Central Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 241–44.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  42. Gabriella Ilonszki, ‘Parties and parliamentary party groups in the making, Hungary 1989–1997’ in Knut Heidar and Ruud Koole, eds, Parliamentary Party Groups in European Democracies. Political Parties Behind Closed Doors, London: Routledge, 2000, p. 229.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Magdolna Balázs and Zsolt Enyedi, ‘Hungarian Case Studies: The Alliance of Free Democrats and the Alliance of Young Democrats’ in Paul G. Lewis, ed., Party Structure and Organization in East-Central Europe, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1996, p. 63.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Bill Lomax, ‘The 1998 Elections in Hungary: Third Time Lucky for the Young Democrats’, The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, vol. 15, no. 2, June 1999, p. 114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Csilla Kiss, ‘From Liberalism to Conservatism: The Federation of Young Democrats in Post-Communist Hungary’, East European Politics and Societies, vol. 16, no. 3, fall 2002, p. 758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Gábor Tóka, ‘Seats and Votes: Consequences of the Hungarian Electoral Law’ in Gábor Tóka, ed., The 1990 Election to the Hungarian National Assembly. Analyses, Documents and Data, Berlin: Sigma, 1995, p. 56.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kenneth Benoit, ‘Two Steps Forward, One Step Back: Electoral Coordination in the Hungarian Election of 1998’, Paper presented to the 2000 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Mariott Wardman Park, 31 August-3 September 2000, pp. 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kenneth Benoit, ‘Like Déjà Vu All Over Again: The Hungarian Parliamentary Elections of 2002,’ The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, vol. 18, no. 4, December 2002, p. 129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Cas Mudde, ‘Extreme-right parties in Eastern Europe’, Patterns of Prejudice, vol. 34, no. 1, January 2000, p. 20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tomáš Kostelecký, Political Parties after Communism. Developments in East-Central Europe, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 2002, p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Jiri Pehe, ‘Czech Elections: Victory for a New Generation’, RFE/RL East European Perspectives, vol. 4, no. 17, 21 August 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Jeffrey M. Jordan, ‘Patronage and Corruption in the Czech Republic (Part I)’, RFE/RL East European Perspectives, vol. 4, no. 4, 20 February 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Sabrina Ramet, ‘Democratization in Slovenia — the Second Stage’ in Karen Dawisha and Bruce Parrott, eds, Politics, Power; and the Struggle for Democracy in South-East Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, p. 212.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Andrej Auersperger Matic, ‘Electoral Reform as a Constitutional Dilemma’, East European Constitutional Review, vol. 8, no. 3, summer 2000, p. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Grigore Pop-Elecheş, ‘Separated at Birth or Separated by Birth? The Communist Successor Parties in Romania and Hungary’, East European Politics and Societies, vol. 13, no. 1, winter 1999, p. 125, pp. 139–40.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Petre Datculescu, ‘Romania: Parties and Issues after 1989’ in Kay Lawson, Andrea Römmele, and Georgi Karasimeonov, eds, Cleavages, Parties, and Voters. Studies from Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Romania, London: Praeger, 1999, p. 170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2004 Frances Millard

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Millard, F. (2004). Political Parties and Party Systems. In: Elections, Parties and Representation in Post-Communist Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000865_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics