Abstract
The broad context of political change in post-communist countries was unique. In Western Europe, the process of democratisation was lengthy, organic, and largely evolutionary. It was effectively a process of gradual extension of the franchise and the opening up of the system to new election contenders. Underlying economic and social changes, arising from the spread of industrialisation and urbanisation, were undoubtedly both cause and consequence of this political process. But there was no notion of an advance blueprint guiding the direction of change and there was no single point at which the achievement of ‘democracy’ was proclaimed. The concept of representative democracy evolved as a part of the process itself. But at some ill-defined point in this evolution political parties emerged as the central actors of the democratic drama. In the communist states the starting point was quite different, both in context and in the dramatis personae. A single-party monopoly directed society on the basis of its claim to command the precepts of scientific socialism in order to construct an egalitarian society free from exploitation and alienation. Under communist party auspices economic development was substantial, if skewed to the industrial sector. Urbanisation was extensive. Levels of education were high. The franchise was universal, and efficient mechanisms of electoral administration were in place. The dysfunctions of the political-economic system, however, were acute, and attempts to reform the system gathered pace, triggering three different sorts of regime change.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Kieran Williams, ‘What was Mečiarism?’ in Kieran Williams, ed., Slovakia After Communism and Mečiarism, London: School of Slavonic and East European Studies, 2000, pp. 4–5.
Jon Elster, ‘Constitution Making in Eastern Europe: Rebuilding the Boat in the Open Sea’, Public Administration, vol. 71, spring-summer 1993, pp. 169–217.
Petr Kopecký, ‘Developing Party Organisations in East-Central Europe: What Type of Party is Likely to Emerge?’, Party Politics, vol. 1, no. 4, 1995, p. 518.
Maurizio Cotta, ‘Structuring the New Party Systems after the Dictatorship. Coalitions, Alliances, Fusions and Splits during the Transition and Post-transition Stages’ in Geoffrey Pridham and Paul G. Lewis, eds, Stabilising Fragile Democracies. Comparing New Party Systems in Southern and Eastern Europe, London: Routledge, 1996, pp. 69–99.
Sarah Birch, Frances Millard, Marina Popescu and Kieran Williams, Embodying Democracy. Electoral System Design in Post-Communist Europe, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2002, p. 151.
Ilya Prizel, ‘Ukraine between Proto-democracy and “Soft” Authoritarianism’ in Karen Dawisha and Bruce Parrott, eds, Democratic Changes and Authoritarian Reactions in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, and Moldova, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997, p. 355.
Clare McManus-Czubińska, William Miller, Radosław Markowski and Jacek Wasilewski, ‘The New Polish “Right”?’, Paper presented at the Workshop on the Central European Right and EU Enlargement, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, London, July 2002.
Keith Darden, ‘Blackmail as a Tool of State Domination: Ukraine under Kuchma’, East European Constitutional Review, vol. 10, nos 2, 3, spring-summer 2001, pp. 67–71.
ODIHR, ‘Ukraine. Parliamentary Elections 31 March 2002’, Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR, 27 May 2002.
OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, ‘Russian Federation Elections to the State Duma 19 December 1999. Final Report’, OSCE: Warsaw, 13 February 2000.
Andy Wilson, ‘Ukraine’s 2002 Elections: Less Fraud. More Virtuality’, East European Constitutional Review, vol. 11, no. 3, summer 2002, pp. 91–8.
William Miller, Stephen White, and Paul Heywood, Values and Political Change in Postcommunist Europe, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press, 1998, p. 170.
Jacek Bielasiak, ‘The Institutionalization of Electoral and Party Systems in Postcommunist States’, Comparative Politics, vol. 34, no. 2, January 2002, p. 199.
Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Richard Hofferbert and Ian Budge, Parties, Policies and Democracy, Boulder: Westview Press, 1994.
Richard Rose, ‘How Floating Parties Frustrate Democratic Accountability: A Supply-Side View of Russia’s Elections’ in Archie Brown, ed., Contemporary Russian Politics: A Reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, p. 216.
Neil Robinson, Russia. A State of Uncertainty, London: Routledge, 2002, pp. 77–90.
Joel Heilman, ‘Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions’, World Politics, vol. 50, no. 2, 1998, pp. 203–234.
Yitzhak Brudny, ‘Continuity or Change in Russian Electoral Patterns? The December 1999-March 2000 Election Cycle’ in Archie Brown, ed., Contemporary Russian Politics: A Reader, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, p. 178.
Adolf Sprudzs, ‘Rebuilding Democracy in Latvia: Overcoming a Dual Legacy’ in Jan Zielonka, ed., Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001 (vol. 1: Institutional Engineering), p. 163.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Frances Millard
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Millard, F. (2004). Conclusion: Elections, Parties, and Representation. In: Elections, Parties and Representation in Post-Communist Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000865_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230000865_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50996-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-00086-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)