Advertisement

When Left and Right Is a Matter ofIdentity: Overlapping Political Dimensions in Estonia and Latvia

  • Kjetil Duvold
Chapter
  • 273 Downloads

Abstract

“Socialism” became largely discredited all over Central and Eastern Europe with the collapse of communism, but perhaps more so in the Baltic countries. The three Baltic countries have in common a half-century long history as Soviet republics, but they differ from the rest of the Soviet Union in important respects. Not only because they experienced independence and democratic institutions in the Interwar period but also because they have somehow managed to cut themselves loose from the post-Soviet region, largely dominated by Russia, and aligned themselves with Europe and the West. However, their common Soviet legacy also sets them apart from what we usually call “Central and Eastern Europe”. In particular, they were not in charge of state borders and, thus, could not control the patterns of migration within the USSR. As a result, Estonia and Latvia experienced dramatic population changes over the decades. By 1989, one in three Estonians were from a non-Estonian Soviet republic, usually Russia, without much knowledge about Estonia and the Estonian language. In Latvia, almost half the population was of non-Latvian background at the onset of independence. As the two Soviet republics were loosening the ties with Moscow towards the end of the perestroika period, they were obliged to navigate a very delicate demographic situation. In the spirit of the time, many Russianspeakers were positive about independence, or at least greater autonomy within the USSR, while others fiercely opposed the idea. The majority remained, however, rather passive. The popular fronts—the Estonian Rahvarinne and the Latvian Tautas fronte—kept an inclusive approach towards the minorities, notably in terms of citizenship, but were challenged by more radical nationalists who started a process of registering all pre-Soviet citizens and their descendants and wanted to restrict the body of citizens to these groups. Meanwhile, the former communist parties all but vanished.1 When the two countries eventually introduced their citizenship laws, the Soviet threat was gone, Russia weakened and the radicals had won the argument: practically all Soviet-era immigrants were automatically excluded and it would take many years before the bulk of them became citizens. Many Balts feared that a forceful Russian population, vested with strong political representation, could disassemble the newly independent states and unravel several key priorities (such as security and defence arrangements and European alignments). The overriding notion was that the minority population would have to be co-opted into the citizenry on a gradual basis (Pettai and Hallik 2002). But even with a weak minority presence within the party systems, the ethno-linguistic cleavage was in fact firmly established from the outset and became more dominant as the minority electorate grew stronger and more vocal. This process is still taking place.

Keywords

Policy Preference Party System Baltic Country Soviet Republic Conservative Party 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Auers, Daunis. 2013. Latvia. In The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe (3rd ed.), edited by Sten Berglund, Joakim Ekman, Kevin Deegan-Krause, and Terje Knutsen, 85–124. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 2015. Comparative Politics and Government of the Baltic States: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania in the 21st Century. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baltic Barometer. 2014. Baltic Barometer 2014: A Decade of EU Membership [Data file]. Södertörn University.Google Scholar
  4. Baltic Business News. 2015. Estonia Rocked by Second Major Corruption Scandal in Weeks. Baltic Business News, September 23. http://balticbusinessnews.com/article/2015/9/23/estonia-rocked-by-second-major-corruption-scandal-in-weeks-1.
  5. Bennich-Björkman, Li, and Karl Magnus Johansson. 2012. Explaining Moderation in Nationalism: Divergent Trajectories of National Conservative Parties in Estonia and Latvia. Comparative European Politics 10: 585–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berglund, Sten, and Kjetil Duvold. 2015.The Lingering Impact of the Past: Political Divides in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, University of Warsaw, 29 March–2 April.Google Scholar
  7. Berglund, Sten, Joakim Ekman, Kevin Deegan-Krause, and Terje Knutsen, eds. 2013. The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe. 3rd Enlarged ed. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  8. Bobbio, Noberto. 1996. Left and Right. The Significance of a Political Distinction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chandra, Kanchan.2011. What Is an Ethnic Party? Party Politics 17(2): 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cheskina, Ammon. 2012. History, Conflicting Collective Memories, and National Identities: How Latvia’s Russian-Speakers Are Learning to Remember. Nationalities Papers: The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity 40(4): 561–584.Google Scholar
  11. Dalton, Russell J., David M. Farrell, and Ian McAllister. 2011. Political Parties and Democratic Linkage. How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dimitrova, Antonaneta, and Geoffrey Pridham. 2004. International Actors and Democracy Promotion in Central and Eastern Europe: The Integration Model and Its Limits. Democratization 11(5): 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duvold, Kjetil.2010. Making Sense of Baltic Democracy: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania between the Soviet Union and the European Union. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Duvold, Kjetil, and Mindaugas Jurkynas. 2004. Lithuania. In The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe (2nd ed.), ed. Sten Berglund, Joakim Ekman, and Frank Aarebrot. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  15. Hirschmann, Albert O. 1995. Social Conflicts as Pillars of Democratic Market Societies. In A Propensity to Self-Subversion, ed. Albert O. Hirschmann, 231–248. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Inglehart, Ronald, and Hans-Dieter Klingemann. 1976. Party Identification, Ideological preference and the Left-Right Dimension among Western Publics. In Party Identification and Beyond, ed. Ian Budge, Ivor Drewe, and Dennis Farlie, 243–273. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Jahn, Dietlef. 2011. Conceptualizing Left and Right in Comparative Politics: Towards a Deductive Approach. Party Politics 17(6): 745–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kasekamp, Andres. 2010. A History of the Baltic States. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  20. Laitin, David D. 1998. Identity in Formation: The Russian-Speaking Populations in the Near Abroad. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lauristin, Maarju, and Peeter Vihalemm. 2009. The Political Agenda during Different Periods of Estonian Transformation: External and Internal Factors. Journal of Baltic Studies 40(1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lewis, Paul. 2000. Political Parties in Post-Communist Eastern Europe. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Lieven, Anatol. 1994. The Baltic Revolution: Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania and the Path to Independence. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Markowski, Radoslaw. 1997. Political Parties and Ideological Space in East Central Europe. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 30(3): 221–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Milne, Richard. 2015. Party with Ties to Putin Pushes Ahead in Estonian Polls. Financial Times, February 27. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1decfbac-be8a-11e4-a341-00144feab7de.html#axzz41qnh9phW.
  26. Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand. 1998. Ethnoregionalist Parties in Western Europe. Theoretical Considerations and Framework of Analysis. In Regionalist Parties in Western Europe, ed. Lieven De Winter L., and Tursan Huri, 17–27. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Nakai, Ryo. 2014. The Influence of Party Competition on Minority Politics: A Comparison of Latvia and Estonia. Journal on Ethnopolitics and Minority Issues in Europe 13(1): 57–85.Google Scholar
  28. Okulicz-Kozaryn, Adam. 2014. Winners and Losers in Transition: Preferences for Redistribution and Nostalgia for Communism in Eastern Europe. Kyklos 67(3): 447–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pettai, Vello, and Klara Hallik. 2002. Understanding Process of Ethnic Control: Segmentation, Dependency and Co-optation in Post-communist Estonia. Nations and Nationalism 8(4): 505–529.Google Scholar
  30. Pettai, Vello, and Martin Mölder. 2013. Estonia. Nations in Transit 2013. Freedom House. https://www.freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/NIT13EstoniaFinal.pdf.
  31. Stratfor Global Intelligence. 2010. A Political Scandal in Estonia and Russian Influence in the Baltics Analysis. Stratfor Global Intelligence, October 27. https://www.stratfor.com/analysis/political-scandal-estonia-and-russian-influence-baltics.
  32. Vihalemm, Triin, and Veronika Kalmus. 2009. Cultural Differentiation of the Russian Minority. Journal of Baltic Studies 40(1): 95–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zielinski, Jakub. 2002. Translating Social Cleavages into Party Systems: The Significance of New Democracies. World Politics 54: 184–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kjetil Duvold
    • 1
  1. 1.Dalarna University CollegeDalarnaSweden

Personalised recommendations