Advertisement

The Baltic Sea Region: From a Hinge Between Russia and the West to a Rhizomatic Information Channel

  • Aki-Mauri Huhtinen
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter discusses the transition of the Baltic Sea Region (BSR) from a hinge between Russia and the West to a rhizome—from a fixed and linear point of connection between two geopolitical areas to a polydimensional network of nodal interactivity. To this end, the chapter takes as its primary focal points the rhizomatic1 information channels and mechanisms that currently exist for both communication and conflict in the region, as well as the way in which the East–West dialogue can be fostered in the Baltic context, and the importance of rhizomatic technologies for future interactions in the BSR. In tracing this development, the chapter posits that (1) an ideological misunderstanding has emerged between the West and Russia, inflamed by the Ukraine war and exacerbated by the wave of refugees into Europe; (2) the media, especially social media in the information domain, play a significant role in compounding this misunderstanding, but also play a key role in keeping the information channels open, especially in the security domain; (3) the BSR countries may still have a role in resolving the misunderstanding thanks to their traditional hinge-like connection to Russia, ranging from geopolitics to information politics; and (4) the misunderstanding that exists not only poses a risk to the rhizomatic information networks but may also point the way to a new kind of mobile virtual neighbouring. Indeed, rhizomatic information hybridity and mobile virtual perspectives offer the possibility for more diffused and heterogeneous understandings than those that are confined within state boundaries (Browning and Joenniemi 2007, 17).

Keywords

European Union European Union Member State Baltic State Syrian Refugee Shop Cross Border 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alexander, Lawrence. 2015. Massive LiveJournal Troll Network Pushes Pro-Kremlin Narratives. Global Voices, December 22. https://globalvoices.org/2015/12/22/massive-livejournal-troll-network-pushes-pro-kremlin-narratives/print/.
  2. Bartkowski, Maciej. 2015. Countering Hybrid War: Civil Resistance as a National Defence Strategy. Open Democracy, May 12. https://www.opendemocracy.net/civilresistance/maciej-bartkowski/countering-hybrid-war-civil-resistance-as-national-defence-strateg.
  3. Bender, Jeremy. 2014. Putin Is Infiltrating European Politics with Shocking Effectiveness. Business Insider, December 9. http://uk.businessinsider.com/putin-is-infiltrating-europe-2014-12.
  4. Bertelman, Tomas, Johan Molander, and Sven-Olof Peterson. 2015. Myths about Russia and Swedish Non-Alliance. The American Interest, August 18. http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/08/18/myths-about-russia-and-swedish-non-alliance/.
  5. Bogdanas, Ramunas. 2014. Philosopher Nerija Putinaitė on Three Lithuanian Europes. Delfi, October 27. http://en.delfi.lt/lithuania/society/philosopher-nerija-putinaite-on-three-lithuanian-europes.d?id=66212578.
  6. Borg, Stefan, and Thomas Dietz. 2016. Postmodern EU? Integration between Alternative Horizons and Territorial Angst. JCMS 2016 54(1): 136–151. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.12327/epdf.Google Scholar
  7. Browning, Christopher S., and Pertti Joenniemi. 2007. Gibraltar, Jerusalem, Kaliningrad: Peripherality, Marginality, Hybridity. Report from the Åland Islands Peace Institute, No. 1-2007. http://www.peace.ax/images/stories/pdf/Report1-2007.pdf.
  8. Chia, Robert. 1999. A ‘Rhizomic’ Model of Organizational Change and Transformation: Perspective from a Metaphysics of Change. British Journal of Management 10: 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Decade Forecast. 2015–2025. The Fifth Decade Forecast Published by Stratfor. Stratfor Global Intelligence. http://www.stratfor.com.
  10. Deleuze, Gilles, and Felix Guattari. 1983. On the Line. Trans. John Johnston. New York: Semiotext(s).Google Scholar
  11. Digital Agenda for Europe. 2015. 2016. A Europe 2020 Initiative. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/progress-country.
  12. Eizenšmits, Arnolds. 2015. The ‘Why?’ for Renewed Defence Cooperation in the Baltic Sea Region. Latvian Institute for International Affairs. http://liia.lv/en/blogs/nbp9-time-for-a-leap-forward/.
  13. Fussell, Chris. 2015. Why Special Ops Stopped Relying So Much on Top-Down Leadership. Harvard Business Review, May 27. https://hbr.org/2015/05/why-special-ops-stopped-relying-so-much-on-top-down-leadership.
  14. Geopolitical Diary. 2015. Sweden and Finland Consider NATO Membership. Stratfor. https://www.stratfor.com/geopolitical-diary.
  15. Guha, Manabrata. 2011. Reimagining War in the 21st Century. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Joenniemi, Pertti, and Alexander Sergunin. 2016. Russian Subnational Actors: Paradiplomacies in the European and Russian Arctic. In Future Security of the Global Arctic: State Policy, Economic Security and Climate, ed. Lassi Heininen, 55–76. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kojala, Linas, and Vilius Ivanauskas. 2014. Lithuanian Eastern Policy 2004–2014: The Role Theory Approach, 49–71. http://www.academia.edu/10651860/Lithuanian_Eastern_Policy_2004-2014_the_Role_Theory_Approach.
  18. Laats, J.M. 2015. Ossinovski Causes Trouble for Coalition on Day 1. News.err, September 4. http://news.err.ee/v/politics/521b38a3-acfd-484d-bfa6-9270ce560fc9.
  19. Laine, Veera, et al. 2015. Zugzwang in Slow Motion? The Implications of Russia’s System-Level Crisis. The Finnish Institute of International Affairs. FIIA Analysis 6, December 2015, Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  20. Lödén, H. 2008. Swedish: Being or Becoming? Immigration, National Identity and the Democratic State. International Journal of Social Sciences 3: 4 .http://www.kau.se/sites/default/files/Dokument/subpage/2009/12/v3_4_33_pdf_17281.pdf Google Scholar
  21. Lubov. 2015. Top Social Networks in Russia: Latest Numbers and Trends. Russian Search Tips, January 20. http://www.russiansearchtips.com/2015/01/top-social-networks-russia-latest-numbers-trends/.
  22. Lucas, Edward. 2015. “The Coming Storm.” Baltic Sea Security Report. The Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA). http://www.cepa.org/content/new-cepa-report-baltic-sea-security-coming-storm.
  23. Luoma-aho, Vilma. 2015. Understanding Stakeholder Engagement: Faith-holders, Hateholders & Fakeholders. Research Journal of the Institute for Public Relations 2(1). http://www.instituteforpr.org/understanding-stakeholder-engagement-faith-holders-hateholders-fakeholders/.
  24. Maliukevičius, Nerijus. 2015. ‘Tools of Destabilization’: Kremlin’s Media Offensive in Lithuania. Journal on Baltic Security 1(1): 117–126.Google Scholar
  25. Mangold, W. Glynn, and David J. Faulds. 2009. Social Media: The New Hybrid Element of the Promotion mix. Business Horizon 52: 357–365 .http://www.researchgate.net/profile/David_Faulds/publication/222415599_Social_media_The_new_hybrid_element_of_the_promotion_mix/links/00463532845a0100af000000.pdf CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Matlack, Carol, Michael Riley, and Jordan Robertson. 2015. Kaspersky Lab Has Published Reports on Alleged Electronic Espionage by the U.S., Israel, and the U.K.—But Hasn’t Looked as Aggressively at Russia. Bloomberg, March 21. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-19/cybersecurity-kaspersky-has-close-ties-to-russian-spies.
  27. McNamara, Eoin Micheál, Magnus Nordenman, and Charly Salonius-Pasternak. 2015. Nordic-Baltic Security and US Foreign Policy: A Durable Transatlantic Link? Finnish Institute of International Affairs. http://www.fiia.fi/fi/publication/515/nordic-baltic_security_and_us_foreign_policy/?utm_source=julkaisutiedote_fin&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nordic-baltic%20security.
  28. Morozov, Viatcheslav. 2015. Aimed for the Better, Ended Up with the Worst: Russia and International Order. Journal on Baltic Security 1(1): 26–36.Google Scholar
  29. Muravska, Tatjana. 2015. Divided Latvia Goes with the Flow on Refugee Policies. Europe’s World, October 26. http://europesworld.org/2015/10/26/divided-latvia-goes-with-the-flow-on-refugee-policies/#.VnUUaL_D-K8.
  30. NSCO. 2016. NATO Stratcom Centre of Excellence. web site. http://www.stratcomcoe.org.
  31. Paavola, Jarkko, and Harri Jalonen. 2015. An Approach to Detect and Analyze the Impact of Biased Information Sources in the Social Media. Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Cyber Warfare & Security, University of Hertfordshire Hatfield, UK 2–3 July 2015, ed. Dr. Nasser Abouzakhar, a conference managed by ACPI, UK, 213–220.Google Scholar
  32. Paviolinis, Žygimantas. 2014. The First Decade of Lithuania in the European Union: between Meta-Political Values and ‘Pragmatic’ Politics. Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review 12(1): 55–74.Google Scholar
  33. Popescu, Nicu. 2015. Hybrid Tactics: Neither New Nor Only Russian. European Union Institute for Security Studies. http://www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/Alert_4_hybrid_warfare.pdf.
  34. Richards, Susan. 2011. Lost and Found in Russia. In Encounters in a Deep Heartland. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  35. Robertson, Scott P., et al. 2013. Political Discourse on Social Networking Sites: Sentiment, In-Group/Out-Group Orientation and Rationality. Information Polity: The International Journal of Government & Democracy in the Information Age 18(2): 107–126.Google Scholar
  36. Russia Insider. 2015. New Sanctions against Russia—Merkel on Collision Course with Europe. December 7. http://russia-insider.com/en/new-sanctions-against-russia-merkel-collision-course-europe/ri11697.
  37. Sakwa, Richard. 2015. Frontline Ukraine. In Crisis in the Borderlands. UK: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  38. StratComCoe. 2015. Internet Trolling as a Hybrid Warfare Tool: The Case of Latvia. Executive Summary. http://www.stratcomcoe.org (Board of Authors: Prof. Andris Spruds, Assoc. Prof. Anda Rožukalne, Dr. Klavs Sedlenieks, Mr. Martins Daugulis, Ms. Diana Potjomkina, Ms. Beatrix Tölgyesi (UK), Ms. Ilvija Bruge).
  39. Tambur, Silver. 2014. Estonia Second in the World by Internet Freedom. Estonia World, December 5. http://estonianworld.com/technology/estonia-second-world-internet-freedom/.
  40. Tanquintic-Misa, Esther. 2015. NATO Member Lithuania Publishes War Survival Manual to Prepare Citizens vs Russia. International Business Time, January 17. http://www.ibtimes.com.au/nato-member-lithuania-publishes-war-survival-manual-prepare-citizens-vs-russia-1412117.
  41. Veijola, Soile, and Petra Falin. 2014. “Mobile Neighbouring”. Mobilities. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Winnerstig, Mike. 2014. Security Policy at Road’s End? The Roles of Sweden and Finland in the Nordic-Baltic Defence Cooperation Process. Lithuanian Annual Strategic Review 12(1): 151–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aki-Mauri Huhtinen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Leadership and Military PedagogyFinnish National Defence UniversityHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations