The “Russian World” and the Securitization of Identity Boundaries in Latvia

  • Angela Kachuyevski


Western European, Eastern European and Scandinavian cultures converge in the Baltic, making this region a rich subject for the study of borders and boundaries that encompass diffuse identities, policies of inclusion and exclusion, and competing normative ideological orders. Within this context, Latvia offers an excellent illustration of these dynamics given demographics and the corresponding tension between Latvia’s stated commitment to European norms of democracy and human rights, and its policies that have resulted in an exclusionary polity. The inconsistency between European Union (EU) norms, which are based upon an integrative model that is essentially post-national, and Latvia’s nation-building policy, which is designed to (re)construct a Latvian nation-state, has exacerbated regional tensions that have persisted despite more than two decades of Latvian independence and full integration into the European order.


European Union Identity Boundary Russian Language Soviet Period Legitimate Polity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Balzacq, Thierry. 2005. The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context. European Journal of International Relations 11: 171–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ———. 2011. Securitization Theory: How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Berdyaev, Nikolai. 1947. The Russian Idea. London: Geoffrey Bles.Google Scholar
  4. Buzan, Barry. 1983. People, States, Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations. Brighton, Sussex: Weatsheaf Books.Google Scholar
  5. Buzan, Barry, and Ole Waever. 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buzan, Barry, Ole Waever, and Jaap de Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  7. Cheskin, Ammon. 2013. Exploring Russian-Speaking Identity from Below: The Case of Latvia. Journal of Baltic Studies 44: 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. ———. 2015. Identity and Integration of Russian Speakers in the Baltic States: A Framework for Analysis. Ethnopolitics 14: 72–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christou, George. 2010. European Union Security Logics to the East: The European Neighbourhood Policy and the Eastern Partnership. European Security 19: 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Concept of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation. 2013. Accessed 27 February 2016.
  11. Culture Ministry of the Republic of Latvia. 2011. Guidelines for National Identity, Civil Society and Integration Politics (2012–2018). Riga.Google Scholar
  12. Eglitis, Daina Stukuls. 2002. Imagining the Nation: History, Modernity, and Revolution in Latvia. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fein, Lisa C. 2005. Symbolic Boundaries and National Borders: The Construction of an Estonian Russian Identity. Nationalities Papers 33: 333–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feklyunina, Valentina. 2015. Soft Power and Identity: Russia, Ukraine and the ‘Russian World(s)’. European Journal of International Relations. doi: 10.1177/1354066115601200.Google Scholar
  15. Galbreath, David J. 2006. European Integration Through Democratic Conditionality: Latvia in the Context of Minority Rights. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 14: 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Herd, Graeme P., and Joan Löfgren. 2001. ‘Societal Security’, the Baltic States and EU Integration. Cooperation and Conflict 36: 273–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ijabs, Ivars. 2015. After the Referendum: Militant Democracy and Nation-Building in Latvia. East European Politics & Societies. doi: 10.1177/0888325415593630.Google Scholar
  18. Jutila, Matti. 2006. Desecuritizing Minority Rights: Against Determinism. Security Dialogue 37: 167–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kachuyevski, Angela, and Ronnie Olesker. 2014. Divided Societies and Identity Boundaries: A Conflict Analysis Framework. International Journal of Conflict Management 25: 304–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laitin, David. 1998. Identity in Formation: The Russian-Speaking Populations in the Near Abroad. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Laruelle, Marlène. 2014. The ‘Russian Idea’ on the Small Screen: Staging National Identity on Russia’s TV. Demokratizatsiya 22: 313–333.Google Scholar
  22. ———. 2015. The “Russian World”: Russia’s Soft Power and Geopolitical Imagination. Washington, DC: Center on Global Interests.Google Scholar
  23. Makarychev, Andrey, and Alexandra Yatsyk. 2014. (Un)locking Political Borders. Problems of Post-Communism 61: 34–45.Google Scholar
  24. McDonald, Michael. 2008. Securitization and the Construction of Security. European Journal of International Relations 14: 563–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Melvin, Neil. 1995. Russians beyond Russia: The Politics of National Identity. London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  26. Muižnieks, Nils, ed. 2010. How Integrated Is Latvian Society? An Audit of Achievements, Failures and Challenges. Riga: University of Latvia Press.Google Scholar
  27. Onken, Eva-Clarita. 2007. The Baltic States and Moscow’s 9 May Commemoration: Analysing Memory Politics in Europe. Europe-Asia Studies 59: 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Patsiurko, Natalka, and Claire Wallace. 2014. Citizenship, Europe and Ethnic Boundary Making among Russian Minorities in Latvia and Lithuania. Migration Letters 11: 187–205.Google Scholar
  29. Putin, Vladimir. 2001. Address of the President of the Russian Federation V.V. Putin to the Congress of Compatriots. October 11.
  30. ———. 2007. Address to the Federal Assembly. April 26.
  31. ———. 2014a. Address by President of the Russian Federation. March 18.
  32. ———. 2014b. Conference of Russian Ambassadors and Permanent Representatives. July 1.
  33. Roe, Paul. 2004. Securitization and Minority Rights: Conditions of Desecuritization. Security Dialogue 35: 279–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ross, Marc Howard. 2000. Psychocultural Interpretations and Dramas: Identity Dynamics in Ethnic Conflict. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association, Los Angeles, California, March.Google Scholar
  35. SKDS Survey. 2014. Piederības sajūta Latvijai. (accessed January 30, 2016).
  36. Smith, Graham. 1996. The Ethnic Democracy Thesis and the Citizenship Question in Estonia and Latvia. Nationalities Papers 24: 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stritzel, Holger. 2011. Security, the Translation. Security Dialogue 42: 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tajfel, Henri. 1970. Experiments in Intergroup Discrimination. Scientific American 223: 96–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. ———. 1981. Social Identity and Group Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Tajfel, Henri, and John Turner. 1979. An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, eds. William G. Austin and StevenWorchel, 33–48. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. ———. 1986. The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In Psychology of Intergroup Relations, eds. Steven Worchel and William G. Austin, 7–24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Tilly, Charles. 1997. Contentious Politics and Social Change. African Studies 56: 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. ———. 2005. Identities, Boundaries, and Social Ties. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  44. Waever, Ole. 1995. Securitization and Desecuritization. In On Security, ed. Ronnie Lipschultz, 46–86. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Waever, Ole, Barry Buzan, Pierre Lemaitre, and Morton Kelstrup. 1993. Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe. London: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  46. Williams, Michael. 2003. Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics. International Studies Quarterly 47: 511–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zevelev, Igor. 2014. The Russian World Boundaries: Russia’s National Identity Transformation and New Foreign Policy Doctrine. Russia in Global Affairs 7.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Angela Kachuyevski
    • 1
  1. 1.Arcadia UniversityGlensideUSA

Personalised recommendations