Advertisement

Introduction: The Baltic Sea Region—Scars, Seams and Stitches

  • Andrey Makarychev
  • Klaus Segbers
Chapter

Abstract

This book is a result of a networked project designed and implemented by the Centre for East European Studies at the Free University in Berlin and the Johan Skytte Institute of Political Science at the University of Tartu. The research agenda that gave a start to this book in 2014 focused on a variety of bordering and de-bordering practices unfolding in the Baltic Sea Region (BSR), an area that is usually considered to be the most successful example of region-building in a wider Europe. In the literature, the BSR is often referred to as a model for other regions-in-the-making, located at the intersection of the EU and Russia, and a possible source of spill-over effects and sharing of best practices with other regions constituting the EU–Russia common neighbourhood.

Keywords

Baltic State Baltic Country Regional Society Energy Efficiency Program Central Asian Country 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Kazharski, Aliaksei, and Andrey Makarychev. 2015. Suturing the Neighborhood? Russia and the EU in Conflictual Intersubjectivity. Problems of Post-Communism 62(6) (November–December): 328–339.Google Scholar
  2. Makarychev, Andrey. 2015. Self-Inflicted Marginalization? Illiberal Russia in Search for Its Own Reality. Barcelona: Notes Internacionals CIDOB 121.Google Scholar
  3. Makarychev, Andrey, and Alexandra Yatsyk. 2014. (Un)locking Political Borders: Implications for EU-Russia Relations in Eastern Europe. Problems of Post-Communism 61(6) (November–December): 34–45.Google Scholar
  4. Monticelli, Daniele. 2008. Wholeness and Its Remainders: Theoretical Procedures of Totalization and Detotalization in Semiotics, Philosophy and Politics. Tartu: Tartu University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Nolan, Steve. 2009. Film, Lacan and the Subject of Religion. A Psychoanalytical Approach to Religious Film Analysis. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  6. Ponzio, Augusto. 2009. Sign, Dialogue, and Alterity. Semiotica 173(1/4): 129–154.Google Scholar
  7. Rajaram, Prem Kumar, and Carl Grundy-Warr.2007. Borderscapes. Hidden Geographies and Politics at Territory’s Edge. Minneapolis: The University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  8. Salter, Mark. 2012. Theory of the /: The Suture and Critical Border Studies. Geopolitics 17: 734–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Schoenle, Andreas, and Jeremy Shine. 2006. Introduction. In Lotman and Cultural Studies. Encounters and Extensions. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  10. Žižek, Slavoj. 2001. The Fright of Read Tears: Krzystof Kieslowski between Theory and Post-Theory. London: British Film Institute.Google Scholar
  11. ———. 2012a. Less than Nothing. Hegel and the Shadow of Dialectical Marxism. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2012b. “Suture”. Forty Years Later. In Concept and Form. Vol. 2: Interviews and Essays on the Cahiers Pour l’Analyse, eds. Peter Hallward and Knox Peden, 147–168. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrey Makarychev
    • 1
  • Klaus Segbers
    • 1
  1. 1.Free University BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations