Abstract
In the last decade, Jürgen Habermas focused on the economic and political obstacles undermining the “faltering project” of the European Union, along with the technocratic apparatus and the media complexity permeating the mass representation of such an epochal socio-political process. His sociological analysis aims to emphasize the rhetorical flair of the public narration of our common European perspective, in line with the difficult construction of effective deliberative procedures and democratic dissemination. Thus, “more Europe” can be considered a legitimate but treacherous slogan exploited by the “media-based political communication”, in conjunction with the tenets of solidarity, inclusion, cohabitation and social sharing. Therefore, the dialectic of the European people and European citizens provides an insight into the “transnationalizing democracy”, since journalistic narration can influence the public sphere through the convergence of informative inputs and outputs. The project of the European Union has Romantic roots, according to the letter that Heinrich Heine drafted in Genoa in 1828: “There are no longer nations in Europe but parties”. If the lure of technocracy may conceal hidden interests, the European lure of rhetoric emphasizes the new communicative patterns of our supranational destiny, as long as information interlaces with transparency and knowledge in the era of faltering certainties.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ampola, M., & Corchia, L. (2007). Dialogo su Jürgen Habermas: le trasformazioni della modernità. ETS.
Bauman, Z. (2004). Europe: An Unfinished Adventure. Polity Press.
Beck, U. (2000). What Is Globalization? Polity Press.
Beck, U. (2008). World at Risk. Polity Press. (Original Work Published 1998).
Beck, U. (2010). A God of One’s Own: Religion’s Capacity for Peace and Potential for Violence. Polity Press. (Original Work Published 2008).
Beck, U. (2016). The Metamorphosis of the World: How Climate Change Is Transforming Our Concept of the World. Polity Press.
Behr, H. (2021). Technocracy and the Tragedy of EU Governance. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 17(2), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1178
Belluati, M., & Cepernich, C. (2017). Europe in the Media Space: The Construction of the EU Public Sphere in Italy. In M. Ceretta & B. Curli (Eds.), Discourses and Counter-Discourses on Europe: From the Enlightenment to the EU (pp. 189–215). Routledge.
Beyes, T. (2022). Staying with the Secret: The Public Sphere in Platform Society. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(4), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221104681
Bofinger, P., Habermas, J, & Nida-Rümelin, J. (2012, August). Only Deeper European Unification Can Save the Eurozone. The Guardian. Retrieved form https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/09/deeper-european-unification-save-eurozone
Born, G. (2013). Mediating the Public Sphere: Digitisation, Pluralism, and Communicative Democracy. In C. Emden & D. R. Midgley (Eds.), Beyond Habermas: Democracy, Knowledge, and the Public Sphere (pp. 119–146). Berghahn Books.
Castells, M. (2001). The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society. Oxford University Press.
Cavaliere, A. (2020). Il cosmopolitismo di Jürgen Habermas alla prova dell’Europa. Noesis, 35–36, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.4000/noesis.5356
Ceppa, L. (2022). Jürgen Habermas: The New Digital Public Sphere. The Lab’s Quarterly, 1, 7–16.
Corchia, L. (2009). La logica dei processi culturali. Jürgen Habermas tra filosofia e sociologia. ECIG.
Corchia, L. (2012). La teoria della socializzazione di Jürgen Habermas. Un’applicazione ontogenetica delle scienze ricostruttive. ETS.
Couldry, N. (2000). The Place of Media Power: Pilgrims and Witnesses of the Media Age. Routledge.
Couldry, N. (2014). Mediatization and the Future of Field Theory. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization of Communication (pp. 227–247). De Gruyter.
Cronin, C. (2009). Translator’s Preface. In I. J. Habermas (Ed.), Europe: The Faltering Project (pp. vii–xviii). Polity Press.
D’Ambrosi, L. (2019). La comunicazione pubblica dell’Europa. Istituzioni, cittadini e media digitali. Carocci.
De Zúňiga, H. G. (2015). Toward a European Public Sphere? International Journal of Communication, 9, 3152–3160.
Edmondson, W. (1981). Spoken Discourse: A Model for Analysis. Longman.
Englund, T. (2010). Educational Implications of the Idea of Deliberative Democracy. In M. Murphy & T. Fleming (Eds.), Habermas, Critical Theory and Education (pp. 19–32). Routledge.
Eriksen, E. O. (2009). The Unfinished Democratization of Europe. Oxford University Press.
Fiske, J. (1994). Media Matters. University of Minnesota Press.
Furedi, F. (2018). How Fear Works: Culture of Fear in the Twenty-First Century. Bloomsbury.
Giaccardi, C., & Magatti, M. (2020). Nella fine è l’inizio. In che mondo vivremo. Il Mulino.
Grady, H. H., & Wells, S. (1985). Toward a Rhetoric of Intersubjectivity: Introducing Jürgen Habermas. Journal of Advanced Composition, 6, 33–47.
Gregoratto, F. (2013). Il doppio volto della comunicazione. Normatività, dominio e critica nell’opera di Jürgen Habermas. Mimesis.
Grewal, S. (2019). Habermas and European Integration (2nd ed.). Manchester University Press.
Günther, K. (2016). Zur Rekonstruktion des Rechts (1). In P. Köller & C. Hiebaum (Eds.), Jürgen Habermas: Faktizität und Geltung (pp. 51–68). De Gruyter.
Habermas, J. (1973). Theory and Praxis. Beacon Press. (Original Work Published 1963).
Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Beacon Press. (Original Work Published 1981).
Habermas, J. (1990). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Polity Press. (Original Work Published 1985).
Habermas, J. (2008). Between Naturalism and Religion. Polity Press. (Original Work Published 2006).
Habermas, J. (2009). Europe: The Faltering Project. Polity Press. (Original Work Published 2008).
Habermas, J. (2012). The Crisis of the European Union: A Response. Polity Press. (Original Work Published 2011).
Habermas, J. (2015). The Lure of Technocracy. Polity Press. (Original Work Published 2013).
Habermas, J. (2018, July 13). Are We Still Good Europeans? Zeit. Retrieved from https://www.socialeurope.eu/are-we-still-good-europeans
Habermas, J. (2022). Reflections and Hypotheses on a Further Structural Transformation of the Political Public Sphere. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(4), 145–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221112341
Häussler, T. (2019). The Media and the Public Sphere: A Deliberative Model of Democracy. Routledge.
Heins, V. M. (2016). Habermas on the European Crisis: Attempting the Impossible. Thesis Eleven, 133(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513616636378
Holub, R. C. (1991). Jürgen Habermas: Critic in the Public Sphere. Routledge.
Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York University Press.
Kelty, C. (2013). Geeks and Recursive Publics: How the Internet and Free Software Make Things Public. In C. Emden & D. R. Midgley (Eds.), Beyond Habermas: Democracy, Knowledge, and the Public Sphere (pp. 99–118). Berghahn Books.
Lombardinilo, A. (2019a). Habermas e l’immaginario dell’Europa unita: note su Heine. Metis, 2, 73–96.
Lombardinilo, A. (2019b). Università in democrazia. Habermas e la sfera della comunicazione accademica. Mimesis.
Lombardinilo, A. (2020). “Are We Still Good Europeans?” Jürgen Habermas and the Italian Crisis. Italian Sociological Review, 10(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.13136/isr.v10i1.316
Maus, I. (2009). Diritti di libertà e sovranità popolare. La ricostruzione habermasiana del sistema dei diritti. In I. I. Maus (Ed.), Diritti umani, democrazia e organizzazione globale (pp. 7–75). Trauben.
McCarthy, T. M. C. (1992). Practical Discourse: On the Relation of Morality to Politics. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (pp. 51–72). The MIT Press.
McCormick, J. P. (2009). Weber, Habermas and Transformations of the European State: Constitutional, Social, and Supranational Democracy. Cambridge University Press. (Original Work Published 2003).
Nguyen, D. (2018). Europe, the Crisis, and the Internet: A Web Sphere Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Niesen, P. (2001). Volk-von-Teufeln-Republikanismus. Zur Frage nach den moralischen Ressourcen der liberalen Demokratie. In L. Wingert & K. Günther (Eds.), Die Öffentlichkeit der Vernunft und die Vernunft der Öffentlichkeit. Festschrift für Jürgen Habermas (pp. 568–604). Suhrkamp Verlag.
O’Neill, M. (2009). The Struggle for the European Institution. Routledge.
Papastephanou, M. (2010). Communicative Utopia and Political Re-Education. In M. Murphy & T. Fleming (Eds.), Habermas, Critical Theory and Education (pp. 33–46). Routledge.
Pendenza, M. (2011). Sociologie per l’Europa. Ulrich Beck, Gerard Delanty, Anthony Giddens, Jürgen Habermas. Carocci.
Pensky, M. (2008). The Ends of Solidarity: Discourse Theory in Ethics and Politics. State University of New York Press.
Peters, G. F. (2000). The Poet as Provocateur: Heinrich Heine and His Critics. Camden House.
Peters, G. F. (2002). Heine and Weimar. In R. F. Cook (Ed.), A Companion to the Works of Heinrich Heine (pp. 345–360). Camden House.
Phelan, A. (2006). Reading Heinrich Heine. Cambridge University Press.
Piras, M. (2016). The Basis of Liberal Democracy: Political Not Moral? Some Critical Remarks on Habermas’s Principle D. Biblioteca della libertà, 2, 69–81.
Rawls, J. (1996). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press.
Sennett, R. (2011). The Foreigner: Two Essays on Exile. Notting Hill Editions.
Silverstone, R. (2007). Media and Morality: On the Rise of the Mediapolis. Polity Press.
Soane Pérez, F. (2013). Political Communication in Europe: The Cultural and Structural Limits of the European Public Sphere. Palgrave Macmillan.
Staab, P., & Thiel, T. (2022). Social Media and the Digital Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere. Theory, Culture & Society, 39(4), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221103527
Van Dijk, J. (2012). The Network Society (3rd ed.). Sage.
Vogel, M. (2012). Media of Reason: A Theory of Rationality. Columbia University Press.
Volpe, A. (2021). Le ragioni dell’Europa. Habermas e il progetto d’integrazione tra etica e politica. Mimesis.
Weinshall, M. (2003). Means, Ends, and Public Ignorance in Habermas’ Theory of Democracy. Critical Review, 15, 23–58.
Wessler, H. (2018). Habermas and the Media. Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lombardinilo, A. (2024). The Lure of Rhetoric: Jürgen Habermas and the Faltering European Project. In: The Lure of Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-96084-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-96084-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-96083-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-96084-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)