Dehumanization in Modern Medicine and Science

Chapter

Abstract

Modern medicine and science share propensities to objectify and dehumanize the person. The concept of the person has been a neglected area of scholarship in medicine. This neglect is related to emphasis on third-person perspective methodologies that dominate the social sciences and medicine. A more adequate comprehension of personhood requires holistic and non-reductive approaches to science that integrate first-person and second-person perspectives of the person along with third-person perspectives. Resistance to a paradigm shift in science, which would integrate qualitative and quantitative methodologies, can be understood as defensive attempts to maintain the existential dogmatism wedded to scientism and technization as the dominant discourse of medicine, psychiatry, and psychology. This defensiveness can, itself, be understood as a worldview defense that provides protection against anxiety linked to mortality concerns.

References

  1. Agledahl, K. M., Gulbransen, P., Forde, R., & Wifstad, A. (2011). Courteous but not curious: How doctors’ politeness masks their existential neglect. A qualitative study of video-recorded patient consultations. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(11), 650–654.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Angermeyer, M. C. (2002). From intuition- to evidence-based anti-stigma interventions. World Psychiatry, 1(1), 21–22.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Angermeyer, M. C., Holzinger, A., & Matschinger, H. (2009). Mental health literacy and attitudes toward people with mental illness: A trend analysis based on population surveyes in the eastern part of Germany. European Psychiatry, 24(4), 225–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Angermeyer, M. C., Holzinger, A., Carta, M. G., & Schomorus, G. (2011). Biogenetic explanations and public acceptance of mental illness: Systematic review of population studies. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 199(5), 367–372.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Annells, M. (1996). Hermeneutic phenomenology: Philosophical perspectives and current use in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23(4), 705–713.Google Scholar
  6. Baars, E., & Baars, T. (2007). Towards a philosophical underpinning of the holistic concept of integrity of organisms within organic agriculture. NJAS—Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 54(4), 463–467.Google Scholar
  7. Beck, C. (1994). Phenomenology: Its use in nursing research. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 31(6), 499–510.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Byrne, P. (2000). Stigma of mental illness and ways of diminishing it. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 6(1), 65–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cameron, C. D., Harris, C. T., & Payne, B. K. (2016). The emotional cost of humanity: Anticipated exhaustion motivates dehumanization of stigmatized targets. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(2), 105–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Capozza, D., Falvo, R., Boin, J., & Colledani, D. (2016). Dehumanization in medical contexts: An expanding research field. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology Applied Psychology, 23(4), 545–559.Google Scholar
  11. Cheng, Y., Kin, C. P., Liu, H. L., Hsu, Y. Y., Lim, K. E., Hung, D., & Decety, J. (2007). Expertise modulates the perception of pain in others. Current Biology, 17, 1708–1713.Google Scholar
  12. Churchland, P. M. (1981). Eliminative materialism and the propositional attitudes. Journal of Philosophy, 78(2), 67–90.Google Scholar
  13. Churchland, P. M. (1986). Neurophilosophy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Churchland, P. M. (1989). Folk psychology and the explanation of human behavior. In Churchland (Ed.), A neurocomputational perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel—Now? The anterior insula and human awareness. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(1), 59–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. De Lubac, H. (1995). The drama of atheist humanism. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
  17. De Zulveta, P. (2013). Compassion in 21st century medicine: Is it sustainable? Clinical Ethics, 8(4), 87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Decety, J., Yang, C. Y., & Cheng, Y. (2010). Physicians down-regulate their pain empathy response: An event-reated brain potential study. Neuroimage, 50, 1676–1682.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Edward, K. (2006). A theoretical discussing bout the clinical value of phenomenology for nurses. Holistic Nursing Practice, 20(5), 235–238.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Fan, Y., Wonneberger, C., Enzi, B., & de Greck, M. (2011). The narcissistic self and its psychological and neural correlates: An exploratory fMRI study. Psychological Medicine, 41(8), 1641–1650.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Friedman, H. (2008). Humanistic and positive psychology: The methodological and epistemological divide. The Humanistic Psychologist, 36(2), 113–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goodwin, B. (1999). From control to participation via a science of qualities. ReVision, 31(4), 26–27.Google Scholar
  23. Hackel, L. M., Looser, C. E., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2014). Group membership alters the threshold for mind perception: The role of social identity, collective identification, and intergroup threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 52, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haque, O. S., & Waytz, A. (2012). Dehumanization in medicine: Causes, solutions, and functions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(2), 176–186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Haslam, N. (2006). Dehumanization: An integrative review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 252–264.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hodson, G., & Costello, K. (2007). Interpersonal disgust, ideological orientations, and dehumanization as predictors of intergroup attitudes. Psychological Science, 18(8), 691–698.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackson, P. L., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2005). How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. Neuroimage, 24(3), 771–779.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Jasper, M. A. (1994). Issues in phenomenology for researchers in nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(2), 309–313.Google Scholar
  29. Jewson, N. (1976). The disappearance of the sick man from medical cosmology, 1770–1870. Sociology, 10(3), 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kendler, H. H. (1999). The role of value in the world of psychology. American Psychologist, 54(10), 828–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Klackl, J., Jonas, E., & Kronbichler, M. (2014). Existential neuroscience: Self-esteem moderates neuronal responses to mortality-related stimuli. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(11), 1754–1761.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kvaale, E. P., Gottdiener, W. H., & Haslam, N. (2013). Biogenetic explanations and stigma: A meta-analytic review of associations among laypeople. Social Science and Medicine, 96, 95–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kvaale, E. P., Haslam, N., & Gottdiener, W. H. (2013). The ‘side effects’ of medicalization: A meta-analytic review of how biogenetic explanations affect stigma. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(6), 782–794.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Lamm, C., Decety, J., & Singer, T. (2011). Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. Neuroimage, 54(3), 2492–2507.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lebowitz, M. S., & Ahn, W. K. (2014). Effects of biological explanations for mental disorders on clinicians’ empathy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(5), 17786–17790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee, K. (2015). Technology and dehumanization of medicine. In T. Schramme & S. Edwards (Eds.), Handbook of the philosophy of medicine (pp. 1–13). Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Leyens, J. P., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez-Perez, A., & Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The attribution of secondary emotions to ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 186–197.Google Scholar
  39. Mascolo, M. F., & Raeff, C. (2017). Understanding personhood: Can we get there from here? New Ideas in Psychology, 44, 49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McInerney, R. G. (2016). A hermeneutics of love for community-based, participatory action research. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 56(3), 263–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mizrahi, T. (1985). Getting rid of patients: Contradictions in the socialization of internists to the doctor-patient relationship. Sociology of Health and Illness, 7(2), 214–235.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Navarrete, C. D., & Fessler, D. M. T. (2006). Disease avoidance and ethnocentrism: The effects of disease vulnerability and disgust sensitivity on intergroup attitudes. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(4), 270–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Perkins, I. (2008). Dehumanization of the clinician: The demise of the healing relationship. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly, 8(3), 479–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Read, J., Haslam, N., Sayce, L., & Davies, E. (2006). Prejudice and schizophrenia: A review of the ‘mental illness like any other’ approach. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia, 114(5), 303–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Richards, R. J. (2010). The Romantic conception of life: Science and philosophy in the age of Goethe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  46. Robbins, B. D. (1998). A reading of Kuhn in light of Heidegger as a response to Hoeller’s critique of Giorgi. Janus Head, 1(1), 2–35.Google Scholar
  47. Robbins, B. D. (2005). New organs of perception: Goethean science as a cultural therapeutics. Janus Head, 8(1), 113–126.Google Scholar
  48. Robbins, B. D. (2006). The delicate empiricism of Goethe: Phenomenology as a rigorous science of nature. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 6, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Robbins, B. D. (2016). The heart of humanistic psychology: Human dignity disclosed through a hermeneutic of love. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 56(3), 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rusch, N., Angermeyer, M. C., & Corrigan, P. W. (2005). Mental illness stigma: Concepts, consequences, and initiatives to reduce stigma. European psychiatry, 20(8), 529–539.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Schomerus, G., Schwahn, C., Holzinger, A., Corrigan, P. W., Grabe, H. J., Carta, M. G., & Angermeyer, M. C. (2012). Evolution of public attitudes about mental illness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia, 125(6), 440–452.Google Scholar
  52. Schulman-Green, D. (2003). Coping mechanisms of physicians who routinely work with dying patients. Omega, 47, 253–264.Google Scholar
  53. Schulze, B. (2009). Stigma and mental health professionals: A review of the evidence of an intricate relationship. International Review of Psychiatry, 19(2), 137–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Simmons, A., Strigo, I., Matthews, S. C., Paulus, M. P., & Stein, M. B. (2006). Anticipation of aversive visual stimuli is associated with increased activation in anxiety-prone individuals. Biological Psychiatry, 60(4), 402–409.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R., & Frith, C. D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303(5661), 1157–1162.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Stone, M. S. (1997). In search of patient agency in the rhetoric of diabetes care. Technical Communication Quarterly, 6(2), 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Street, R. L., Jr., Makoul, G., Arora, N. K., & Epstein, R. M. (2009). How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling, 74(3), 295–301.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Terwee, S. T. S. (2012). Hermeneutics in psychology and psychoanalysis. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
  59. Trifiletti, E., Di Bernardo, G. A., Falvo, R., & Capozza, D. (2014). Patients are not fully human: A nurse’s coping response to stress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(12), 768–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Turner, B. S. (1995). Medical power and social knowledge (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  61. Vaes, J., & Muratore, M. (2012). Defensive dehumanization in the medical practice: A cross-sectional study from a health care workers’ perspective. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 180–190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Vaes, J., Paladino, M. P., Castelli, L., Leyens, J. P., & Giovanazzi, A. (2003). On the behavioral consequences of infrahumanization: The implicit role of uniquely human emotions in intergroup relations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1016–1034.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Viki, G. T., & Abrams, D. (2003). Infra-humanization: Ambivalent sexism and the attribution of primary and secondary emotions to women. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 492–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wertz, F. J. (1999). Multiple methods in psychology: Epistemological grounding and the possibility of unity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 19(2), 131–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wertz, F. J. (2001). Humanistic psychology and the qualitative research tradition. In K. J. Schneider, J. F. T. Bugental, & J. F. Pierson (Eds.), The handbook of humanistic psychology (pp. 231–246). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  66. Wertz, F. J. (2011). The qualitative revolution and psychology: Science, politics, and ethics. The Humanistic Psychologist, 39(2), 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wilson, A. (2013). Being a practitioner: An application of Heidegger’s phenomenology. Nurse Research, 21(6), 28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zhang, H., Chan, D. K. S., & Cao, Q. (2014). Deliberating on social targets’ goal instrumentality leads to dehumanization: An experimental investigation. Social Cognition, 32(2), 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyPoint Park UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations