Time and Efficiency in the Age of Calculative Rationality: A Metabletic Entry Point

Chapter

Abstract

By turning to a phenomenology of time, medical culture is situated within a radical shift in the conception and experience of time in Western culture. As the experience of time underwent a profound change, the Western world, and medicine, became increasingly ordered for the purpose of risk management as a coping mechanism for dealing with uncertainty and human mortality. However, the emphasis on calculative rationality for the purpose of risk containment paradoxically threatens to undermine the conditions that make life meaningful and give it direction.

References

  1. Adam, B. (2003). Reflexive modernization temporalized. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(2), 59–78 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, U. (1994). The reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernization. In U. Breck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization (pp. 1–55). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U. (2006). Living in the world risk society. Economy and Society, 35(3), 329–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bednall, J. (2006). Epoche and bracketing within the phenomenological paradigm. Issues in Education and Research, 16(2), 123–138.Google Scholar
  6. Crawford, R. (2004). Risk ritual and the management of control and anxiety in medical culture. Health: An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Illness and Medicine, 8(4), 505–528.Google Scholar
  7. Cushman, P. (1995). Constructing the self, constructing America: A cultural history of psychotherapy. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Eliade, M. (1971). The myth of the eternal return: Or, cosmos and history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Finlay, L. (2008). A dance between the reduction and reflexivity: Explicating the “phenomenological psychological attitude”. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 39(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foucault, M. (1961). Madness and civilization: A history of insanity in the age of reason (R. Howard, Trans.). London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  11. Fromm, E. (2003/1956). The sane society. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Galileo, G. (2008). The essential Galileo (M. Finocchiaro, Ed. and Trans.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  13. Gustafson, J. M., & Johnson, E. W. (1989). Efficiency, morality, and managerial effectiveness. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 42(7), 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hannam, J. (2011). The genesis of science: How the Christian Middle Ages launched the scientific revolution. Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
  15. Hatfield, G. (2011). Kant and Helmholtz on primary and secondary qualities. In L. Nolan (Ed.), Primary and secondary qualities: The historical and ongoing debate (pp. 204–338). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Heidelberger, M. (2004). Nature from within: Gustave Theodor Fechner and his psychophysical worldview. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  17. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1972). Dialectics of enlightenment. New York: Seabury.Google Scholar
  18. Husserl, E. (1970/1936). The crisis of the European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy (D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Ihde, D. (1986). Experimental phenomenology: An introduction. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kleinscmidt, H. (2000). Understanding the Middle Ages. New York: Boydell & Brewery.Google Scholar
  21. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Link, S. (2006). Fechner, Gustav Theodor: Encyclopedia of cognitive science. New Jersey: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Macann, C. E. (1993). Four phenomenological philosophers: Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Merleau-Pointy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Marcuse, H. (1955). Eros and civilization: A philosophical inquiry into Freud. New York: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mook, B. (2007). The changing nature of childhood and boyhood: A metabletic study. Boyhood Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 157–178.Google Scholar
  26. Mook, B. (2009). The metabletic method: An interdisciplinary look at human experience. Phenomenology & Practice, 3(1), 26–34.Google Scholar
  27. Nolan, L. (2011). Introduction. In L. Nolan (Ed.), Primary and secondary qualities: The historical and ongoing debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Reed, T. I. (2002). Time in relation to self, world, and God. In A. Ramos & M. I. George (Eds.), Faith, scholarship and culture in the 21st century (pp. 166–177). Washington, DC: Catholic University of American Press.Google Scholar
  29. Robbins, B. D. (2015). The heart of humanistic psychology: Human dignity disclosed through a hermeneutic of love. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 56(30), 1–15.Google Scholar
  30. Romanyshyn, R. D. (1989). Technology as symptom and dream. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Romanyshyn, R. D. (2008). The despotic eye: An illustration of metabletic phenomenology and its implications. Janus Head, 10, 505–527.Google Scholar
  32. Simms, E. M. (2008). The child in the world: Embodiment, time, and language in early childhood. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Sipiora, M. P. (2008). Obligations beyond competency: Metabletics as a conscientious psychology. Janus Head, 10(2), 425–443.Google Scholar
  34. Van den Berg, J. H. (1978). Medical power and medical ethics. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co., Inc.Google Scholar
  35. Van den beg, J. H. (1983). Changing nature of man: Introduction to a historical psychology. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co., Inc.Google Scholar
  36. Williams, R. N. (2015). Introduction. In R. N. Williams & D. N. Robinson (Eds.), Scientism: The new orthodoxy (pp. 1–22). London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  37. Wiltsche, H. A. (2017). Mechanics lost: Husserl’s Galileo and Ihde’s telescope. Husserl Studies, 33(2), 149–173.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyPoint Park UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations