Advertisement

The Changing Nature of the Cadaver

  • Brent Dean Robbins
Chapter

Abstract

By restricting dissection to unknown and stigmatized individuals, dissection in fourteenth-century medical schools lent themselves to a defensive style of psychological distancing from the memorial body of the cadaver. Vesalius exploited the new linear perspective technique in art for his illustrations as a means to enhance an attitude of detached concern in relation to his anatomical specimens. Historical evidence linking Vesalius to Galileo through mutual influences at University of Padua strongly suggests Vesalius’ attitude of detached concern informed and shaped the epistemological orientation of the new physics of Galileo. This epistemological attitude was also informed by the nascent Neoplatonism emerging in the elite circles of learned men in Northern Italy, especially through the influence of Toscanelli.

References

  1. Bennett, J. (1998). Projection and the ubiquitous virtue of geometry in the Renaissance. In C. Smith & J. Agar (Eds.), Making space for science (pp. 27–38). London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boureau, A. (1994). The sacrality of one’s own body in the Middle Ages. Yale French Studies, 86, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Broadie, S. (2001). XVI—Soul and body in Plato and Descartes. The Aristotelian Society, 101(1), 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, E. A. R. (1990). Authority, the family, and the dead in Late Medieval France. French Historical Studies, 16(4), 803–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burgess, H. (2014). The idealized style of Vesalius’ Fabrica illustrations: Art, nature, and aesthetics (Doctoral dissertation). Otago: University of Otago.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, K. (1973). Metamorphosis of a death symbol: The transi tomb in the late Middle Ages. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Collier, C. (2013). Recovering the body: A philosophical story. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
  8. Crombie, A. C. (1986). Experimental science and the rational artist in early modern Europe. Daedalus, 115(3), 49–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cruz, J. C. (1977). The incorruptibles. Rockford, IL: TAN books.Google Scholar
  10. Davidson, A. I. (2009). Miracles of bodily transformation, or how St. Francis received the stigmata. Critical Inquiry, 35(3), 451–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fermi, L., & Bernardini, G. (2013). Galileo and the scientific revolution. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Field, A. M. (2014). The origins of the Platonic Academic of Florence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Gerson, L. P. (1986). Platonic dualism. The Monist, 69(3), 352–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gillespie, M. A. (2008). The theological origins of modernity. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gillespie, M. A. (2010). The theological origins of modernity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Grant, E. (2001). God and reason in the Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hendrix, J. S. (2012). Alberti and Ficino. School of Architecture, Art, and Historic Preservation Faculty Publications, (Paper 25). Bristol: Roger Williams University.Google Scholar
  18. Hoff, J. (2013). The analogical turn: Rethinking modernity with Nicholas of Cusa. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdman’s Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  19. Hudson, N. J. (2007). Becoming god: The doctrine of theosis in Nicholas of Cusa. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ivan, R. I. (2013). The connection between salvation, martyrdom, and suffering according to St. Ignatius of Antioch. Kairos, 7(2), 167–182.Google Scholar
  21. Joffe, S. N. (2014). Andreas Vesalius: The making, the madman, and the myth. Bloomington, IN: Authorhouse.Google Scholar
  22. Katinis, T. (2010). A humanist confronts the plague: Ficino’s Consilio contro la Pestilentia. MLN, 125(1), 72–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kemp, M. (1978). Science, non-science and nonsense: The interpretation of Brunelleschi’s perspective. Art History, 1(2), 134–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kretzmann, N., Kenny, A., & Pinborg, J. (Eds.). (1988). The Cambridge history of later Medieval philosophy: From the rediscovery of Aristotle to the disintegration of scholasticism, 1100–1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kusukawa, S. (2012). Picturing the book of nature: Image, text, and argument in sixteenth-century human anatomy and medical botany. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee, M. K. (2011). The distinction between primary and secondary qualities in Ancient Greek philosophy. In L. Nolan (Ed.), Primary and second qualities: The historical and ongoing debate (pp. 15–40). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Merchant, C. (1990). The death of nature: Women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. New York: HarperOne.Google Scholar
  28. Nussbaum, M. C. (1995). Objectification. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 24(4), 249–291.Google Scholar
  29. Park, K. (1994). The criminal and the saintly body: Autopsy and dissection in Renaissance Italy. Renaissance Quarterly, 47(1), 1–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Park, K. (1995). The life of the corpse: Division and dissection in Late Medieval Europe. Journal of the History of Medicine, 50, 111–132.Google Scholar
  31. Park, K. (2010). Secrets of women: Gender, generation, and the origins of human dissection. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  32. Pringle, H. (2001). The Mummy Congress: Science, obsession, and the everlasting dead. New York, NY: Hyperion Books.Google Scholar
  33. Rubenstein, R. E. (2003). Aristotle’s children: How Christians, Muslims, and Jews rediscovered ancient wisdom and illuminated the Middle Ages. Orlando, FL: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  34. Sorabji, R. (1974). Body and soul in Aristotle. Philosophy, 49(187), 63–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyPoint Park UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations