Skip to main content

Masculinity and Gay-Friendly Advertising: A Comparative Analysis Between the Italian and US Market

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Language, Gender and Sexuality ((PSLGS))

Abstract

In this chapter, we look at the representations of masculinity in gay-friendly printed adverts and commercials, focusing on the tensions between marketing and socio-political discourses that occur within them. We also offer a comparative perspective between gay-friendly advertising in Italy and in the USA, starting from two specific campaigns: “Findus Piramide” which consists of a series of commercials for the brand Findus broadcast in Italy in 2014 and Tiffany’s campaign “Will You?”, appearing in commercials and printed adverts in the USA in 2015. These examples reflect a new trend in advertising where non-heterosexual orientations are represented in a positive way and demonstrate that the representation of gay-friendly advertising is connected to marketing strategies and structured differently according to the cultural context and its acceptance of LGBT issues.

Federici was the lead author for parts 1, 3.2 and 4 while Bernardelli led on parts 2 and 3.1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    The campaign was produced by Havas Worldwide and planned by Havas Media, Milan.

  2. 2.

    http://riforma.it/it/articolo/2016/02/01/litalia-e-le-religioni-nel-2016

  3. 3.

    Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the pastoral care of homosexual persons http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/congregations/cfaith/documents/rc_con_cfaith_doc_19861001_homosexual-persons_en.html

  4. 4.

    Different newspapers commented on the ad, for example, Il Fatto Quotidiano (B. Ballardini, “Findus, 4 schiaffi a Barilla” “Findus 4 slaps to Barilla” June 11, 2014 where the title clearly refers to Barilla’s chairman’s declaration that gay families did not represent his company’s values prompting a boycott of Barilla’s products), Il Giornale (G. Masini, “Findus sfratta il capitano per far posto alle coppie gay” “Findus fires the Captain to give a job to gay couples” August 11, 2014 where the title refers to the previous testimonial of the brand who was an old sailor), Il Corriere della sera (E. Tebano, “Il posto del barbuto capitano Findus? L’hanno preso due ragazzi gay” “The place of bearded Captain Findus? It has been taken by two gay young men) both referring to the old image of the sea captain used for the brand, which was traditional and part of a classic image of masculinity, changed with the representation of a gay couple, but only for these new products.

  5. 5.

    “Quattro salti” is the name of the product line.

  6. 6.

    For more examples of LGBT commercials and adverts see www.commercialcloset.com

  7. 7.

    http://www.gallup.com/poll/1690/religion.aspx

  8. 8.

    In Italy this campaign has caused a strong reaction by the Conservative Party (NcD Nuovo Centro Destra) who affirmed that the printed ad showing the gay couple cannot be utilised because it will contrast with the identity of Italian people (meaning being gay means being anti-Italian). See M. Winkler’s article “Tiffany, la campagna gay-friendly? Per il governo è passibile di denuncia” Il Fatto quotidiano Jan 13, 2015.

  9. 9.

    Greimas ’s (1989) visual semiotics distinguishes between figurative and plastic levels of analysis of an image. Figurative categories permit the identification of objects, figures and representations carrying a recognisable signifier (the figure of a man, an object). The concept of plastic signifier is used to analyse images from the point of view of three main subcategories: topological categories (rectilinear like upper/lower or felt/right and curvilinear like peripheral/central and closing/enclosed), chromatic categories (colours, brightness and saturation) and eidetic categories (shapes and forms).

References

  • Badgett, M. L. V. (2001). Money, Myths and Change—The Economic Lives of Lesbians and Gay Men. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, P. (2008). Sexed Tetxs. Language, Gender, and Sexuality. London: Equinox.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronski, M. (1984). Culture Clash: The Making of Gay Sexuality. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasin, A. (2000). Selling Out: The Gay and Lesbian Movement Goes to Market. New York and Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choong, K. (2010). Targeting Gay Men: The Cryptic Approach. www.ANZMAC.org

  • Clarke, D. (2000). Commodity Lesbianism. In H. Abelove et al. (Eds.), The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader (pp. 186–201). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danesi, M. (2013). Encyclopedia of Media and Communication. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, L. (2002). The Incredible Shrinking Public: Sexual Politics and the Decline of Democracy. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, P. (1997). The Benetton-Toscani Effect: Testing the Limits of Conventional Advertising. In M. Nava, A. Blake, I. MacRury, & B. Richards (Eds.), Buy This Book: Studies in Advertising and Consumption (pp. 64–83). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floch, J. M. (2001). Semiotics, Marketing, and Communication: Beneath the Signs, the Strategies. Basingstoke (UK), Palgrave (first edition: Sémiotique, marketing et communication: sous les signes, les stratégies. Paris: PUF, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1979). Gender Advertisements. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greimas, A. J. (1987). On Meaning: Selected Writings in Semiotic Theory (P. Perron & F. Collins, Trans.). London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greimas, A. J. (1989). Figurative Semiotics and the Semiotics of the Plastic Arts. New Literary History, 20(3), 627–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greimas, A. J. (1990). Narrative Semiotics and Cognitive Discourses (P. Perron & F. Collins, Trans.). London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, J. N. (2000). Les marques à l’épreuve de la pratique. Paris: Editions d’Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, S. (1999). Making the Ad Perfectly Queer: Marketing ‘Normality’ to the Gay Maen’s Community? Journal of Advertising, 28(1), 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates, S. (2000). Out of the Closet and Out on the Street! Gay Men and Their Brand Relationship. Psychology and Marketing, 17, 493–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, M. H. (2000). Queer Theory and Social Change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, K. (2003). Representing Men: Maleness and Masculinity in the Media. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milani, T. (2014). Queering Masculinities. In S. Erlich, M. Meyerhoff, & J. Holmes (Eds.), Handbook of Language, Gender and Sexuality (2nd ed., pp. 260–278). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Oakenfull, G. W. (2013). What Matters: Factors Influencing Gay Consumers’ Evaluation of ‘Gay-Friendly’ Corporate Activities. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing, 32, 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penney, J. (2013). After Queer Theory: The Limits of Sexual Politics. New York: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, J. (2014). Queer Representations of Gay Males and Masculinities in the Media. Sexuality and Culture, 18(2), 279–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semprini, A. (1996). Analizzare la comunicazione: come analizzare la pubblicità, le immagini, i media. Milano: Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A. (1989). All Dressed Up, But No Place to Go? Style Wars and the New Lesbianism. OUT/LOOK, 1(4), 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, M. M. (2000). ‘It’s Good to Talk?’ The Undermining of Feminism in a British Telecom Advertisement. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(1), 108–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai Wan-Hsiu, S. (2004). Gay Advertising as Negotiations: Representations of Homosexual, Bisexual and Transgender People in Mainstream Commercials. In L. Scott & C. Thompson (Eds.), GCB—Gender and Consumer Behaviour 7 (pp. 1–26). Madison: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuten, T. L. (2005). The Effect of Gay-Friendly and Non-Gay Friendly Cues on Brand Attitudes: A Comparison of Heterosexual and Gay/Lesbian Reactions. Journal of Marketing Management, 21, 441–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, S. (2002). Men and Masculinities: Key Themes and New Directions. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiegman, R., & Wilson, E. (Eds.). (2015). Queer Theory Without Antinormativity, special issue of Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 26(1), 192.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Federici, E., Bernardelli, A. (2018). Masculinity and Gay-Friendly Advertising: A Comparative Analysis Between the Italian and US Market. In: Baker, P., Balirano, G. (eds) Queering Masculinities in Language and Culture. Palgrave Studies in Language, Gender and Sexuality. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95327-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95327-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95326-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95327-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics