Diversified and Globalized Memories: The Limits of State-Sponsored History Commissions in East Asia

  • Seiko Mimaki


East Asian “history problems” emerged in the early 1980s, reflecting substantial changes both in the international relations and the domestic politics of China, Korea, and Japan. Since the mid-1990s, Japanese history education has witnessed a nationalist backlash. Aware of the menace of history disputes, Japanese, South Korean, and Chinese governments launched official history commissions, which revealed a deep gap in their historical understanding. At the nongovernmental level, however, there were more fruitful moves. Teachers and activists from the three countries published a jointly written, “A History That Opens to the Future” (2005). It demonstrated the possibility of building a transnational historical understanding through listening to the other’s voices even on controversial issues such as the Nanjing Massacre and the US dropping of the atomic bomb.


  1. Ashby, J. (2001) ‘Controversial Textbooks are Big Sellers for Fusosha’, Japan Times, July 15. Accessed 30 August 2016.
  2. Beal, T., Nozaki, Y., and Yang, J. (2001)‘Ghosts of the Past. The Japanese History Textbooks Controversy’, New Zealand Journal of Asian Studies, 3(2), 177–188.Google Scholar
  3. China-Japan-Korea Common History Text Tri-National Committee (2015) A History to Open the Future. Modern East Asian History and Regional Reconciliation (Honolulu: The University of Hawai’i at Mānoa School of Pacific and Asian Studies).Google Scholar
  4. Chung, C. K. M. (2013) ‘Rethinking, Reflection, Repentance. Comparing “Coming to Terms with the Past”’ in Europe and China. Paper for European Union Academic Programme Hong Kong, 1–23. Accessed 30 August 2016.
  5. Denney, S. (2015) ‘South Korea’s Other History War’, Diplomat, October 16. Accessed 30 August 2016.
  6. Hankyoreh (2013) “New Right” Textbooks Present a Distorted View of History. June 1. Accessed 30 August 2016.
  7. He, Y. (2007) ‘Remembering and Forgetting the War. Elite Mythmaking, Mass Reaction, and Sino-Japanese Relations, 1950–2006’, History and Memory, 19(2), 43–74.Google Scholar
  8. Japan-ROK Joint History Research Committee (2010a) ‘Minutes of the Second Round General Meeting (Japanese)’. Accessed 30 August 2016.
  9. Japan-ROK Joint History Research Committee (2010b) ‘Minutes of the Textbook Subcommittee (Japanese)’. Accessed 30 August 2016.
  10. Kawashima, S. (2010) ‘The Three Phases of Japan-China History Research. What Was the Challenge?’, Asian Perspective, 34(4), 19–43.Google Scholar
  11. Kim, M. (2008) ‘Myths, Milieu, and Facts. History Textbook Controversies in Northeast Asia’ in T. Hasegawa and K. Togo (eds.) East Asia’s Haunted Present. Historical Memories and the Resurgence of Nationalism (Westport: Praeger Security International), pp. 94–118.Google Scholar
  12. Kitaoka, S. (2007) ‘Nitchū Rekishi Kyodō Kenkyū No Shuppatsu. Jijitsu No Tankyū Ni Motozuite’ [‘Launch of the Japan-China Joint History Research. Based on the Search for the Truth’], Gaiko Forum, 20(5), 14–20.Google Scholar
  13. Kitaoka, S. (2010) ‘A Look Back on the Work of the Joint Japanese-Chinese History Research Committee’, Asia-Pacific Review, 17(1), 6–20.Google Scholar
  14. Mimaki, S. (2016) ‘Norm Dynamics and Reconciliation-Japan, US, and East Asia’ in P. Tolliday, M. Palme and D. Kim (eds.) Asia-Pacific Between Conflict and Reconciliation (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht), pp. 266–274.Google Scholar
  15. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2011) ‘Japan-China Joint History Research Report’, March. Accessed 30 August 2016.
  16. Mitani, H. (2007) Rekishi Kyōkasho Mondai [History Textbook Problem] (Tokyo: Nihon Tosho Center).Google Scholar
  17. Mitani, H. (2008) ‘The History Textbook Issue in Japan and East Asia. Institutional Framework, Controversies, and International Efforts for Common Histories’ in T. Hasegawa and K. Togo (eds.) East Asia’s Haunted Present. Historical Memories and the Resurgence of Nationalism (Westport: Praeger Security International), pp. 83–93.Google Scholar
  18. Mitani, H. (2014) ‘Why Do We Still Need to Talk about ‘Historical Understanding in East Asia?’, The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus, August 11. Accessed 30 August 2016.
  19. Nichi Chū Kan Sangoku Kyōtsu Rekishi Kyōzai Iinkai (2005) Mirai wo Hiraku Rekishi [A History to Open the Future. Modern East Asian History and Regional Reconciliation] (Tokyo: Kobunken).Google Scholar
  20. Nozaki, Y, and Inokuchi, H. (2000) ‘Japanese Education, Nationalism, and Ienaga Saburo’s Textbook Lawsuits’ in L. Hein and M. Selden (eds.) Censoring History. Citizenship and Memory in Japan, Germany, and the United States (Armonk: M. E. Sharpe), pp. 96–126.Google Scholar
  21. Nozaki, Y. (2001) ‘Feminism, Nationalism, and the Japanese textbook Controversy over ‘Comfort Women’ in F. T. Winddance and K. M. Blee (eds.) Feminism and Antiracism. International Struggles for Justice (New York: New York University Press), pp. 170–189.Google Scholar
  22. Onishi, N. (2007) ‘Japan’s Textbooks Reflect Revised History’, International New York Times, April 1. Accessed 30 August 2016.
  23. Otsuki, T. (2011) ‘A Point of Connection through Transnational History Textbooks? An Examination of History that Opens to the Future, the Joint History Textbook Initiative of China, Japan and South Korea’ in Paulson J. (ed.) Education, Conflict and Development (Oxford: Symposium Books), pp. 145–164.Google Scholar
  24. Reilly, J. (2006) ‘China’s History Activism and Sino-Japanese Relations’, China: An International Journal, 4(2), 189–216.Google Scholar
  25. Reilly, J. (2011) ‘Remember History, Not Hatred. Collective Remembrance of China’s War of Resistance to Japan’, Modern Asian Studies, 45(2), 463–490.Google Scholar
  26. Rose, C. (1998) Interpreting History in Sino-Japanese Relations. A Case Study in Political Decision-Making (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  27. Ryūkyū Shimpō (2015) ‘None of the Textbooks Selected for Junior High Schools Referred to “Forcible Suicide”’, April 7 (Japanese).Google Scholar
  28. Saito, K. (2008) Chūgoku Kyōkasho to Higashi Ajia Rekishi Taiwa (Chinese History Textbook and Historical Dialogues in East Asia) (Tokyo: Kadensha).Google Scholar
  29. Shin, G. and Snider, D. (2011) (eds.) History Textbooks and the Wars in Asia. Divided Memories (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  30. Shoji, J. (2008) ‘Outlook for the Japan-China Joint History Research Committee’, National Institute for Defense Studies News, 127, 1–5.Google Scholar
  31. Sieg, L. (2007) ‘Historians Battle over Okinawa WWII Mass Suicides’, Reuters, April 6. Accessed 30 August 2016.
  32. Yang, D. (1999) ‘Convergence or Divergence? Recent Historical Writings on the Rape of Nanjing,’ American Historical Review, 104(3), 842–865.Google Scholar
  33. Yang, D., and Sin, J. (2013) ‘Striving for Common History Textbooks in Northeast Asia (China, South Korea and Japan). Between Ideal and Reality’ in K. V. Korostelina and S. Lässig (eds.) History Education and Post-conflict Reconciliation. Reconsidering the Joint Textbook Project (New York: Routledge), pp. 209–229.Google Scholar
  34. Wang, Z. (2008) ‘National Humiliation, History Education, and the Politics of Historical Memory. Patriotic Education Campaign in China’, International Studies Quarterly, 52(4), 783–806.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Seiko Mimaki
    • 1
  1. 1.Takasaki City University of EconomicsTakasakiJapan

Personalised recommendations