Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Truth Commissions and the Politics of History: A Critical Appraisal

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of State-Sponsored History After 1945

  • 1746 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the nexus between the endeavor of truth commissions to establish the truth about past criminal political violence on a mass scale and their function as an instrument of a state-sponsored “politics of history.” Analyzing the commissions’ truth production, it contradicts the prevailing belief in an epistemological divide between scholarship and politics in common understandings of the notion of “politics of history” and argues that the truthfulness of historical knowledge is a crucial resource in the public use of history for political ends. The author also asserts that scholarly discussions should not neglect the question of the commissions’ capacity for truth in the name of an ultimately undemanding relativism, inasmuch as this carries the risk of losing sight of the fundamental rationale prompting the creation of these official bodies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amnesty International (2007) Truth, Justice and Reparation. Establishing an Effective Truth Commission (London, 11 June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakiner, O. (2016) Truth Commissions. Memory, Power, and Legitimacy (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, O. (1996) Evaluation of TRCSA Information Flow and Database, with Recommendations (8 September; University of Cape Town, Manuscripts & Archives Department: Mary Burton Papers: BC 1065: P1.2.2/5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkan, E. (2009) ‘Introduction. Historians and Historical Reconciliation. AHR Forum “Truth and Reconciliation in History”’, American Historical Review, 114(4), 899–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boraine, A. (2000) A Country Unmasked. Inside South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley-Zistel, S. (2014) ‘Narrative Truths. On the Construction of the Past in Truth Commissions’ in S. Buckley-Zistel et al. (eds.) Transitional Justice Theories (Abingdon: Routledge), pp. 144–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallo, A. (1998) La historia oculta de la transición. Chile 1990–1998 (Santiago de Chile: Grijalbo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Comisión Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliación (1996, 2nd ed.) Informe final, 3 vols. (Santiago de Chile: Corporación Nacional de Reparación y Reconciliación, originally published in 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Comisión Nacional sobre la Desaparición de Personas (1984) Nunca más. Informe de la Comisión Nacional sobre la Desaparición de Personas (Buenos Aires: Editorial Universitaria de Buenos Aires).

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa Sutil, J. (2008) Interview of the author with Jorge Correa Sutil, Santiago de Chile, December 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, E. (2008) ‘Truth Skepticism. An Inquiry into the Value of Truth in Times of Transition’ International Journal of Transitional Justice, 2(1), 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, E. (2013) ‘Truth’ in L. Stan and N. Nedelsky (eds.) Encyclopedia of Transitional Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 259–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dancy, G., Kim, H. and Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. (2010) ‘The Turn to Truth. Trends in Truth Commission Experimentation’ Journal of Human Rights, 9(1), 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Pisani, J. A. and Kim, K.–S. (2004) ‘Establishing the Truth about the Apartheid Past. Historians and the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, African Studies Quarterly, 8(1), 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensalaco, M. (2000) Chile under Pinochet. Recovering the Truth (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa Ibarra, C. (2002) ‘La desaparición forzada en Guatemala (1960–1996)’ Estudios Latinoamericanos, 9(18), 151–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M. (2006) Truth Commissions and Procedural Fairness (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garton Ash, T. (1998) ‘The Truth About Dictatorship’, The New York Review of Books, 45(3), 35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandin, G. (2005) ‘The Instruction of Great Catastrophe. Truth Commissions, National History, and State Formation in Argentina, Chile, and Guatemala’, American Historical Review, 110(1), 46–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2000) ‘Über den öffentlichen Gebrauch der Historie. Warum ein “Demokratiepreis” für Daniel Goldhagen?’ in Aus der Geschichte lernen. Verleihung des Blätter-Demokratiepreises 1997 (Bonn: Blätter-Verlagsgesellschaft), 15–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayner, P. B. (2011) Unspeakable Truths. Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions (second edition, New York / London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, T. (2004) ‘Whose Truth? Objective Truth and a Challenge for History’ in Criminal Law Forum, 15(1–2), 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieff, M. (1996) ‘Articles of Faith’, Index on Censorship, 25(5), 110–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlstruck, M. (2004) ‘Erinnerungspolitik. Kollektive Identität, neue Ordnung, Diskurshegemonie’ in B. Schwelling (ed.) Politikwissenschaft als Kulturwissenschaft. Theorien, Methoden, Problemstellungen (Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften), pp. 173–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koselleck, R. (2006) ‘Der 8. Mai zwischen Erinnerung und Geschichte’ in R. von Thadden and S. Kaudelka (eds.) 60 Jahre nach dem Mai 1945 (Göttingen: Wallstein), pp. 13–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalu, P. and Harris, B. (1996) ‘Journeys from the Horizons of History. Text, Trial, and the Tales in the Construction of Narratives of Pain’, Current Writing, 8(2), 24–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, C. (2000) ‘Folter und Rassismus. Südafrika während der Apartheid’ in P. Burschel, G. Distelrath and S. Lembke (eds.) Das Quälen des Körpers. Eine historische Anthropologie der Folter (Köln: Böhlau), pp. 257–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, E. (2008) ‘Memory and Politics’ in A. Erll and A. Nünning (eds.) Cultural Memory Studies. An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook (Berlin: Walter de Gruyter), pp. 173–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlevliet, M. (1998) ‘Considering Truth. Dealing with a Legacy of Gross Human Rights Violations’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 16(2), 141–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, T. G. (2004) Shattered Voices. Language, Violence, and the Work of Truth Commissions (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Policzer, P. (2009) The Rise and Fall of Repression in Chile (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Posel, D. and Simpson, G. (eds.) (2002) Commissioning the Past. Understanding South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (Johannesburg: Witwatersrand University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995’ (1995) in Government Gazette, Republic of South Africa, 16579, 26 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Report of the Chilean National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation (1993) (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press) (English translation of Comisión Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliación: Informe final).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roniger, L. and Sznajder, M. (1999) The Legacy of Human-Rights Violations in the Southern Cone. Argentina, Chile and Uruguay (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Root, R. K. (2012) Transitional Justice in Peru (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuzger, S. (forthcoming) Wahrheitskommissionen: Der nationale Umgang mit historischem Unrecht im Kontext des sich universalisierenden Menschenrechtsdiskurses (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, H. (2009) ‘Vom publizistischen Kampfbegriff zum Forschungskonzept. Zur Historisierung der Kategorie “Geschichtspolitik”’ in H. Schmid (ed.) Geschichtspolitik und kollektives Gedächtnis. Erinnerungskulturen in Theorie und Praxis (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht), pp. 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. (1999) ‘Rarely Pure and Never Simple. Talking about Truth’, Configurations, 7(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa (1997) The Final Report. Some Guiding Principles, [January] (University of Cape Town, Manuscripts & Archives Department: Mary Burton Papers: BC 1065: P1.2.2/7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa (1998 / 2003) Report, 7 vols. (Cape Town: Truth and Reconciliation Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, Secretary-General (2004) The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, 3 August, S/2004/616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbuyst, R. (2013) ‘History, Historians and the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, New Contree, 66, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verwoerd, W. (1996) ‘Continuing the Discussion. Reflections from within the Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, Current Writing, 8(2), 66–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. (2001) The Politics of Truth and Reconciliation in South Africa. Legitimizing the Post-Apartheid State (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfrum, E. (1999a) Geschichtspolitik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Der Weg zur bundesrepubli-kanischen Erinnerung 1948–1990 (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfrum, E. (1999b) ‘Geschichtspolitik in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1949–1989. Phasen und Kontroversen’ in P. Bock and E. Wolfrum (eds.) Umkämpfte Vergangenheit. Geschichtsbilder, Erinnerung und Vergangenheitspolitik im internationalen Vergleich (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht), pp. 55–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. C. (2007) State Terrorism in Latin America. Chile, Argentina, and International Human Rights (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zalaquett, J. (2008) Interview of the author with José Zalaquett, Santiago de Chile, December 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, H. (1990) Politics of History, 2nd edition, with a new introduction (Urbana: University of Illinois Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Stephan Scheuzger

Authors
  1. Stephan Scheuzger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of History, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    Berber Bevernage

  2. CEGESOMA (Belgian State Archives), Brussels, Belgium

    Nico Wouters

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Scheuzger, S. (2018). Truth Commissions and the Politics of History: A Critical Appraisal. In: Bevernage, B., Wouters, N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of State-Sponsored History After 1945. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95306-6_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95306-6_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95305-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95306-6

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation