Skip to main content

Changing Meanings of Family in Personal Relationships: A Comparative Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Families and Personal Networks

Abstract

Family relationships in late modernity are considered to be embedded in wider processes of closeness and commitment, which go beyond blood and alliance principles. The aim of this chapter is to identify who is perceived as family in personal relationships and to examine the overlap between personal configurations and family networks. Despite some blurring of ties, findings show that there continue to be fairly clear boundaries between kin and non-kin ties in the predominant meanings of family. The salience of close kin ties emerges in all three countries, as well as the focus on long-lasting friendship; but there are country-specific aspects with regard to the categories and number of ties imbued with family meaning, the degree of overlap, and the types of family network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Non-kin : Ex- partner , Male Friends, Female Friends, Colleagues, and Other non-kin.

  2. 2.

    This size measure also includes individuals who did not consider any of the personal network members as family .

  3. 3.

    Data for Switzerland not available.

References

  • Aboim, S., & Vasconcelos, P. (2009). Differential and cumulative effects of life course events in an intergenerational perspective: Social trajectories of three-generation family lineages. Swiss Journal of Sociology, 35(2), 297–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan, G. (1998). Friendship, sociology and social structure. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 685–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, G. (2001). Personal relationships in late modernity. Personal Relationships, 8, 325–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, G. (2008). Flexibility, friendship, and family. Personal Relationships, 15, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attias-Donfut, C. (Dir.). (1995). Les Solidarités entre Générations. Paris: Nathan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck-Gernsheim, E. (1998). On the way to a post-familial family: From a community of need to elective affinities. Theory, Culture and Society, 15(3–4), 53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtson, V. L. (2001). Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational ties. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernotas, D., & Guogis, A. (2009). Globalization, social security and the Baltic states. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universiteto leidybos centras.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertozzi, F., Bonoli, G., & Gay-des-Combes, B. (2008). La réforme de l’Etat social en Suisse: vieillissement. Emploi. Conflit travail–famille (2ème éd. mise à jour ed.). Lausanne: Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, F. G., & Mitchell, D. (1993). Worlds of welfare and families of nations. In F. G. Castles (Ed.), Families of nations: Patterns of public policy in Western democracies. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherlin, A. J., & Furstenberg, F. (1994). Stepfamilies in the United States: A reconsideration. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 359–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenen-Huther, J., Kellerhals, J., & von Allmen, M. (1994). Les réseaux de solidarité dans la famille. Lausanne: Éditions Réalités Sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Déchaux, J.-H. (2009). Sociologie de la famille. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, R., & Gillies, V. (2012). Farewell to family? Notes on an argument for retaining the concept. Families, relationships and societies, 1(1), 63–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of post–industrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrera, M. (1996). Modèles de solidarité, divergences, convergences: perspectives pour l’Europe. Swiss Political Science Review, 2(1), 118. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.1996.tb00164.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41(1), 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godelier, M. (2010). Métamorphoses de la parenté. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerreiro, M. D., Torres, A., & Capucha, L. (2009). Welfare and everyday life: Portugal in the European context (Vol. 3). Lisbon: Celta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hantrais, L., & Letablier, M. T. (1996). Families and family policies in Europe. London/New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, L., Simpson, R., & Lewis, R. (Eds.). (2011). Researching families and relationships: Reflections on process. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanopiene, V. (1995). Women’s work and family: Attitudes and behaviour. InLithuanian society in social transition (pp. 75–83). Vilnius: Institute of Philosophy, Sociology and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanopiene, V. (1999). Combining family and professional roles: Gender differences. In V. Stankuniene, P. Eglite, & V. Kanopiene (Eds.), Revue Baltique. Special issue “demographic development in the countries of transition”, 13, 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellerhals, J., Widmer, E., & Lévy, R. (2004). Mesure et démesure du couple. Paris: Payot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitner, S. (2003). Varieties of familialism: The caring functions of the family in comparative perspective. European Societies, 5(4), 353–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévy, R., & Widmer, E. (Eds.). (2013). Gendered life courses between standardization and individualization: A European approach applied to Switzerland. Wien: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrikas, A. A. (2000). Changes of family values in recent decades. Filosofija. Sociologija, 4, 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitrikas, A. A. (2007). Lithuanian family: Changes of values in 1990–2005. In R. Žiliukaitė (Ed.), Development of cultural trends in nowadays Lithuania. Value research. Vilnius: Kultūros, filosofijos ir meno institutas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milardo, R. M. (2010). The forgotten kin: Aunts and uncles. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. (2010). Acquaintances: The space between intimates and strangers. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. H. J. (2011). Rethinking family practices. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, R., & Pevalin, D. J. (2005). Between family and friends: A longitudinal study of friendship choice. British Journal of Sociology, 56(3), 433–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, R., & Spencer, L. (2004). Personal communities: Not simply families of “fate” or “choice”. Current Sociology, 52(2), 199–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseneil, S., & Budgeon, S. (2004). Beyond the conventional family: Intimacy, care and community in the 21st century. Current Sociology, 52(2), 135–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šaulauskas, M. P. (2000). Social change: Methodology and general trends. In D. Ulčinskaitė (Ed.), Social changes: Lithuania. 1990–1998 (pp. 9–36). Vilnius: Garnelis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, N. (1975). Life cycle variations in patterns of close relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 37, 492–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankūnienė, V. (1995). Demographic changes and population policy in Lithuania. Vilnius: Lietuvos filosofijos ir sociologijos institutas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stankuniene, V., & Maslauskaite, A. (2008). Family transformation in the post-communist countries: Attitudes towards changes. In C. Höhn, A. Avramov, & I. Kotowska (Eds.), People. Population change and policies. Lessons from the population policy acceptance study 1 (pp. 113–140). The Hague: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stankūnienė, V., & Maslauskaitė, A. (Eds.). (2009). The Lithuanian family: Between traditions and new realities. Vilnius: Socialinių tyrimų institutas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, K. (2011). A intervenção do Estado: políticas públicas de família. In A. N. de Almeida (Ed.), História da vida privada em Portugal: Os nossos dias (pp. 340–374). Lisboa: Círculo de leitores.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, K., & Gouveia, R. (2014). Changing meanings of family in personal relationships. Current Sociology, 62(3), 352–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wall, K., Aboim, S., Cunha, V., & Vasconcelos, P. (2001). Families and informal support networks in Portugal. Journal of European Social Policy, 11(3), 213–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J., Heaphy, B., & Donovan, C. (2001). Same sex intimacies: Families of choice and other life experiments. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Widmer, E. D. (2006). Who are my family members? Bridging and bonding social capital in family configurations. Journal of Personal and Social Relationships, 23(6), 979–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widmer, E. (2010). Family configurations. A structural approach to family diversity. London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widmer, E., & Jallinoja, R. (Eds.). (2008). Beyond the nuclear family: Families in a configurational perspective. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, F. (2004). Rethinking families. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors of the chapter wish to acknowledge sponsors that made it possible to carry out this investigation, the results of which are presented in the chapter. In Switzerland , the research was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research LIVES Overcoming Vulnerability: Life-Course Perspectives. In Portugal , the research was carried out within the national survey , “Family Trajectories and Social Networks”, coordinated by Professor K. Wall from the Institute of Social Sciences (ICS) from the University of Lisbon. In Lithuania , the research was carried out based on data collected within the research project , “Trajectories of Family Models and Personal Networks: Intergenerational Perspective”, coordinated by Professor V. Kanopiené from Mykolas Romeris University (Lithuania) and funded by the Research Council of Lithuania.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wall, K., Gouveia, R., Aeby, G., Česnuitytė, V. (2018). Changing Meanings of Family in Personal Relationships: A Comparative Perspective. In: Wall, K., Widmer, E., Gauthier, J., Česnuitytė, V., Gouveia, R. (eds) Families and Personal Networks . Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95263-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95263-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95262-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95263-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics