Skip to main content

Theorising Personal Medical Devices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Health, Technology and Society ((HTE))

Abstract

This chapter theorises Personal Medical Devices (PMDs) as technologies and as agents in the construction of self and society. PMDs are at the forefront of technological evolution, taking on biological properties. As interactive network devices, they also connect to issues pertaining to Big Data and the sensor society, including new ways of being tracked and hacked. But these new technologies also map onto old anxieties regarding what it is to be human. We have always used technologies to be competent in the world and to enhance ourselves. For this reason, it is urged that we see PMDs as prostheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrejevic, M., & Burdon, M. (2014). Defining the sensor society. Television and New Media. doi:10.1177/1527476414541552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W. (2010). How is technology made?—That is the question! Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34, 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, H., & Matthewman, S. (2014). Exergy and the city: The technology and sociology of power (failure). Journal of Urban Technology, 21(3), 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big leviathan. In K. Knorr-Cetina & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology (pp. 275–303). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connor, S. (2008). Thinking things. In Extended Version of a Plenary Lecture Given at the 9th Annual Conference of the European Society for the Study of English, Aarhus, Denmark, 25 August. Available online at http://stevenconnor.com/thinkingthings.html. Accessed September 12, 2016.

  • Crawford, K., Lingel, J., & Karppi, T. (2015). Our metrics, ourselves: A hundred years of self-tracking from the weight scale to the wrist wearable device. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4–5), 479–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (2006). Classic Drucker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D. (2009). Another politics of life is possible. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(5), 44–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitbit. (2016). Who we are. Available online at https://www.fitbit.com/nz/about. Accessed June 20, 2016.

  • Foucault, M. (2010). The government of self and others: Lectures at the Collège de France 1982–1983. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S., & Duggan, M. (2013). Health online 2013. Pew Research Internet Project. Available online at http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/. Accessed January 8, 2014.

  • Galvin Electricity Initiative. (2011). The electric power system is unreliable. Available online at http://www.galvinpower.org/resources/library/fact-sheets-faqs/electric-power-system-unreliable. Accessed January 8, 2014.

  • Goodman, M. (2012). Dark data. In R. Smolan & J. Erwitt (Eds.), The human face of big data (pp. 74–77). Against All Odds Productions: Sausalito.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. (Ed.). (2010). Disrupted cities: When infrastructure fails. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2014). Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. London: Profile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holpuch, A. (2013, July 29). Hacker Barnaby Jack’s cause of death could remain unknown for months. The Guardian. Available online at http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jul/29/barnaby-jack-hacker-cause-of-death. Accessed August 28, 2013.

  • Hotz, R. (2011, April 23). What they know: The really smart phone. The Wall Street Journal. Available online at http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704547604576263261679848814. Accessed June 20, 2016.

  • IBM. (2013). The IBM Big Data Platform. IBM Software Group. Available online at http://public.dhe.ibm.com/common/ssi/ecm/en/imb14135usen/IMB14135USEN.PDF. Accessed June 20, 2016.

  • Jansen, L. (2006). Hastening death and the boundaries of the self. Bioethics, 20(2), 105–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khoo, M. (2005). Technologies aren’t what they used to be: Problematising closure and relevant social groups. Social Epistemology, 19(3), 283–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger, C., Landeg, O., & Murray, V. (2014, January 2) Power outages, extreme events and health: A systematic review of the literature from 2011–2012. PLoS Currents 6. Available online at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3879211/. Accessed June 18, 2016.

  • Lakoff, A., & Collier, S. (2010). Infrastructure and event: The political technology of preparedness. In B. Braun & S. Whatmore (Eds.), Political matter: Technoscience, democracy and public life (pp. 243–266). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? Sociology of a door. Available online at http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/50-MISSING-MASSES-GB.pdf. Accessed September 12, 2016.

  • Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2002a). Technology and morality: The ends of means. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(5–6), 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2002b). There is no information, only transformation: An interview with Bruno Latour. In G. Lovink (Ed.), Uncanny networks: Dialogues with the virtual intelligentsia (pp. 154–160). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the Actor-Network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice, 5(4), 379–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., & Bijker, W. (Eds.). (1992). Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, S. (2014). Identity: Sociological perspectives (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, T. (2011). Bio-politics: An advanced introduction. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2013). Understanding the human machine [commentary]. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 32(4), 25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, D. (2016). Digital risk society. This Sociological Life. Available online at https://simplysociology.wordpress.com/. Accessed June 20, 2016.

  • MacGregor, N. (2010). A history of the world in 100 objects. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (Eds.). (1985). The social shaping of technology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malpas, P., & Cooper, L. (2012). The ethics of deactivating a pacemaker in a pacing-Dependent patient. Reflections on a case study. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, 29(7), 566–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markets and Markets. (2015). mHealth Solutions Market by Connected Devices (Blood Pressure Monitor, Glucose Meter, Pulse Oximeter) Apps (Weight Loss, Women’s Health, Personal Health Record, & Medication) Services (Remote Monitoring, Consultation, Prevention)—Global Forecast to 2020. Available online at http://www.marketsandmarkets.com/PressReleases/mhealth-apps-and-solutions.asp. Accessed June 20, 2016.

  • Matthewman, S. (2011). Technology and social theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (2005). Understanding me: Lectures and interviews. Toronto: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, E., & McLuhan, M. (1988). Laws of media: The new science. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, M. (2013). The cloud begins with coal: Big data, big networks, big infrastructure, and big power. Digital Power Group. Available online atwww.tech-pundit.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Cloud_Begins_With_Coal.pdf. Accessed June 18, 2016.

  • Morton, J. (2014, January 22). Implant gives reflux sufferer her life back. The New Zealand Herald.Available online at http://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=11310801. Accessed June 20, 2016.

  • Moyer, C. S. (2012, January 30). Cyberchondria: The one diagnosis patients Miss. American Medical News. Available online at http://www.amednews.com/article/20120130/health/301309952/1/. Accessed August 25, 2014.

  • Pfaffenberger, B. (1992). Technological dramas. Science, Technology and Human Values, 17(3), 282–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. (2012, March 1). McAfee Hacker says Medtronic insulin pumps vulnerable to attack. Bloomberg. Available online athttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-29/mcafee-hacker-says-medtronic-insulin-pumps-vulnerable-to-attack.html. Accessed August 28, 2013.

  • Rose, N. (2001). The politics of life itself. Theory, Culture & Society, 18(6), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotman, B. (2008). Becoming beside ourselves: The alphabet, ghosts, and distributed human being. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sayes, E. (2014). Actor-Network Theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency? Social Studies of Science, 44(1), 134–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah, S., & Robinson, I. (2008). Medical device technologies: Who is the user? International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management, 9(2), 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time: The fault of epimetheus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiegler, B. (2011). This system does not produce pleasure anymore: An interview with Bernard Stiegler. Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy 1. Available online at http://krisis.eu/content/2011-1/krisis-2011-1-05-lemmens.pdf. Accessed June 20, 2016.

  • Thrift, N. (2005). Knowing capitalism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2006). Always-on / always-on-you: The tethered self. Available online at http://web.mit.edu/sturkle/www/Always-on%20Always-on-you_The%20Tethered%20Self_ST.pdf. Accessed May 27, 2010.

  • Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. New York: A.A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeek, P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • West, D. (2013). Improving healthcare through mobile medical devices and sensors. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (1977). Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. (2010). Ancient cut marks reveal far earlier origin of Butchery. Scientific American. Available online athttp://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ancient-cutmarks-reveal-butchery/. Accessed June 20, 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steve Matthewman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Matthewman, S. (2018). Theorising Personal Medical Devices. In: Lynch, R., Farrington, C. (eds) Quantified Lives and Vital Data. Health, Technology and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95235-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95235-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95234-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95235-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics