Skip to main content

Spatial Autonomy and Desistance in Penal Settings. Case Study: The Barlinnie Special Unit (1973–1994)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In post-war Scotland the institutional response to persistently violent and disruptive prisoners was the establishment of a unique network of specialist units providing a number of alternative custody arrangements outside the prison mainstream. This chapter considers the case of the Barlinnie Special Unit (BSU) (1973–1994), arguably the most innovate, anomalous and controversial of these units. It also proved to be the most effective at enabling desistance from prison-based offending. Drawing on prisoners’ autobiographical accounts, the argument presented here reasserts the centrality of individual autonomy in processes of personal change. More specifically, this chapter considers the desistance-promoting effects of granting prisoners ‘spatial autonomy’ over the design, function and aesthetics of their carceral environments. In essence, what the BSU demonstrated is that it was more not less autonomy afforded to prisoners who were considered the most problematic which produced the most profound and authentic behavioural shifts and, moreover, it was less not more institutional control that facilitated this.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In addition to exhibiting his work in a number of European galleries, Jimmy Boyle’s play The Hard Man (co-authored with Tom McGrath) was staged in 1971. Further consolidating his public profile, Channel Four made a film based on his autobiography, A Sense of Freedom, which aired in 1981.

  2. 2.

    Jimmy Boyle published two separate narratives of his prison experiences.

  3. 3.

    Initially, large sections of the media were supportive of these liberal visiting arrangements (unsurprisingly since they were among the beneficiaries of it). In the late 1970s, however, reports that sex workers were being brought into the unit began to surface in local newspapers. The reasonable anxieties (as well as the more salacious gossip) about ‘conjugalities’ reached a crisis point following the publication of the external evaluation. The media seized on one particular paragraph that appeared to confirm officially, or at least authoritatively, the allegations that one suspects newspaper editors were desperate to be true: ‘Naturally it is an open secret that one aspect of privacy is sex’ (Bottomley et al. 1994, 27).

References

  • Baer, L. 2005. ‘Visual Imprints on the Prison Landscape: A Study on the Decorations in Prison Cells.’ Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 96(2): 209–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton, W., and R. Obenland. 1973. Prison and Jail Security: An Empirical Analysis of the Impacts of Closed Circuit Television Surveillance in the Correctional Environment, Guidelines for Application, and a Presentation of Alternative Strategies for Safe and Secure Detention. Urbana, IL: National Clearinghouse for Criminal Justice Planning and Architecture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottomley, K., A. Liebling, and R. Sparks. 1994. ‘The Barlinnie Special Unit and Shotts Unit: An Assessment.’ Scottish Prison Service Occasional Paper, No.7. Edinburgh: Scottish Prison Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, J. 1977. A Sense of Freedom. London: Pan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, J. 1984. The Pain of Confinement: Prison Diaries. London: Pan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, T.C., and R. McKay. 2002. The Wilderness Years. Edinburgh: Cannongate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canter, D. 1987. ‘Implications For “New Generation” Prisons Of Existing Psychological Research Into Prison Design And Use.’ In Problems of Long-Term Imprisonment, edited by A. Bottoms and R. Light, 214–227. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmichael, K. 1982. ‘Daily Living.’ In The Special Unit: Its Evolution through Art, edited by C. Carrell and J. Laing, 22–35. Glasgow: Third Eye Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrell, C., and J. Laing, eds. 1982. The Special Unit: Its Evolution through Art. Glasgow: Third Eye Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheliotis, L., and A. Jordanoska. 2015. ‘The Arts of Desistance: Assessing the Role of Arts-Based Programmes in Reducing Reoffending.’ The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 55(1–2): 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, H. 1997. Autobiography of a Murderer. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D. 1989a. ‘Containing Violent Prisoners: An Analysis of Barlinnie Special Unit.’ British Journal of Criminology 29(2): 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D. 1989b. ‘The Barlinnie Special Unit.’ In Current Issues in Scottish Prisons: Systems of Accountability and Regimes for Difficult Prisoners. Scottish Prison Service Occasional Papers, No.2, edited by E. Wozniak, 116–130. Edinburgh: Scottish Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, A. 1987. ‘The Scottish Experience with Small Units.’ In Problems of Long-term Imprisonment, edited by A.E. Bottoms and R. Light, 228–248. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, G. 1981. ‘The Concept of Autonomy.’ Grazer Philosphische Studien 12/13: 203–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., and A. Mische. 1998. ‘What is Agency?’ American Journal of Sociology 103(4): 962–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairweather, L. 2000. ‘Psychological Effects of the Prison Environment.’ In Prison Architecture: Policy, Design, Experience, edited by L. Fairweather and S. McConville, 31–48. London & New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, P., S. Cernkovich, and J. Rudolph. 2002. ‘Gender, Crime and Desistance: Toward a Theory of Cognitive Transformation.’ American Journal of Sociology 107: 990–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. 1968. Asylums. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodstein, L. 1979. ‘Inmate Adjustment to Prison and the Transition to Community Life.’ Journal of Research in Crime & Delinquency 16(2): 246–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, R. 1999. ‘The Quintessence of a Therapeutic Environment: Five Universal Qualities.’ In Therapeutic Communities: Past, Present, and Future, edited by P. Campling and R. Haigh, 254–257. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, R. 2013. ‘The Quintessence of a Therapeutic Environment.’ Therapeutic Communities 34(1): 6–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, P., and Y. Jewkes. 2011. ‘Architectures of Incarceration: The Spatial Pains of Imprisonment.’ Punishment and Society 13: 611–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegel, G.W.F. 2008. Outlines of the Philosophy of Right, trans. T.M. Knox, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons for Scotland. 1982. Report on HM Special Unit Barlinnie. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons for Scotland. 1986. Report on HM Special Unit Barlinnie. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Prisons for Scotland. 1993. Report on HM Special Unit Barlinnie. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, D. 2013. Spirituality in Dark Places; The Ethics of Solitary Confinement. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, N. 1973. The Human Cage: A Brief History of Prison Architecture. New York: The American Foundation, Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. 1998. Seductions of Crime: The Moral and Sensual Attractions of Doing Evil. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J., and R. Sampson. 2003. Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquent Boys to Age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeBel, T., R. Burnett, S. Maruna, and S. Bushway. 2008. ‘The “Chicken and Egg” of Subjective and Social Factors in Desistance from Crime.’ European Journal of Criminology 5: 131–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. 2001. Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, N. 1974. The Future of Imprisonment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nellis, M. 2010. ‘Creative Arts and the Cultural Politics of Penal Reform: The Early Years of the Barlinnie Special Unit, 1973–1981.’ Journal of Scottish Criminal Justice Studies 16: 47–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, B., and M. Schinkel. 2016. ‘The Pains of Desistance.’ Criminology and Criminal Justice (Advance Online Publication) 16(5). doi:1748895816634812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R., and S. Bushway. 2009. ‘Desistance and the “Feared Self:” Toward an Identity Theory of Criminal Desistance.’ Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 99: 1103–1156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R., and G. Pogarsky. 2009. ‘Rational Choice, Agency and Thoughtfully Reflective Decision Making: The Short and Long-Term Consequences of Making Good Choices.’ Journal of Quantitative Criminology 25: 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paternoster, R., R. Bachman, S. Bushway, E. Kerrison, and D. O’Connell. 2015. ‘Human Agency and Explanations of Criminal Desistance: Arguments for Rational Choice Theory.’ Journal of Developmental Life Course Criminology 1: 209–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, M.H. 1982. ‘The Special Unit: An Experience of Learning.’ In The Special Unit: Its Evolution through Art, edited by C. Carrell and J. Laing, 50–56. Glasgow: Third Eye Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, R.N. 1960. Community as Doctor. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A., ed. 1976. The Mutual Interaction of People and Their Built Environment: A Cross Cultural Perspective. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R., and J. Laub. 1993. Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Home and Health Department. 1971. Treatment of Certain Male Long Term Prisoners and Potentially Violent Prisoners. Report of the Working Party on Alternative Regimes. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scottish Prison Service. 1985. Internal Paper of the Working Party on Alternative Regimes, unpublished paper (July).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shammas, V.L. 2014. ‘The Pains of Freedom: Assessing the Ambiguity of Scandinavian Penal Exceptionalism on Norway’s Prison Island.’ Punishment and Society 16(1): 104–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sibley, D., and B. van Hoven. 2009. ‘The Contamination of Personal Space: Boundary Construction in a Prison Environment.’ Area 41(2): 198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R. 2002. ‘Out of the Digger: The Warrior’s Honour and the Guilty Observer.’ Ethnography 3(4): 556–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, R., A. Bottoms, and W. Hay. 1996. Prisons and the Problem of Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, J. 1992. The Bird That Never Flew. London: Sinclair-Stevenson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, I. 1982. ‘The Role of Education in the Special Unit.’ In The Special Unit: Its Evolution through Art, edited by C. Carrell and J. Laing, 36–43. Glasgow: Third Eye Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, A. 2012. ‘“I Am the Person Now I Was Always Meant to Be”: Identity Reconstruction and Narrative Reframing in Therapeutic Prisons.’ Criminology and Criminal Justice 12(5): 527–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E., and D. Cressey. 1978. Criminology (10th ed.). New York, NY: Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. 1958. The Society of Captives: A Study of a Maximum Security Prison. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toch, H. 1992. Living in Prisons: The Ecology of Survival (Revised ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore, P. 1987. ‘Barlinnie Special Unit: An Insider’s View.’ In Problems of Long-Term Imprisonment, edited by A. Bottoms and R. Light, 249–260. Aldershot: Gower.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, L. 1979. The Silent Scream. Edinburgh: EUSPB.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jessica Bird .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bird, J. (2017). Spatial Autonomy and Desistance in Penal Settings. Case Study: The Barlinnie Special Unit (1973–1994). In: Hart, E., van Ginneken, E. (eds) New Perspectives on Desistance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95185-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95185-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95184-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95185-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics