Skip to main content

Effective Protection or Effective Combat? EU Border Control and North Africa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave Series in African Borderlands Studies ((PSABS))

Abstract

This chapter traces and conceptualizes the evolution of the EurAfrican borderscapes during the 2000s. It points out how a popular, but flawed, perspective that sees borders through a closed-system perspective is responsible for much knowledge production and policy-making in European border politics, including the critical image of Fortress Europe. This image, however, fails, it is argued, to appraise the border regime’s functionality as a transnational network of control nodes. The chapter explains how the traditional conceptualization of forced migration, although important, has viewed border control as a response to forced migration and has therefore not seen how the border control regime in itself is also causing forced migration. The various ways in which states’ border control yields displacement is labelled border-induced displacement and explored. The chapter thus traces the longstanding European externalization of detention camps to Gaddafi’s Libya, the Italian–Libyan Friendship Treaty of 2008, and how it fed into policy driven by the Dutch, British and Danish governments, which had pursued variations of such externalization of European control and responsibility since the 1980s. It also details the kind of issue linkages characterizing the politics of the EurAfrican borderscapes. Finally, and continuously, the chapter interrogates migrants’ humanitarian conditions in the EurAfrican borders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The author is grateful for the generous support from the Carlsberg Foundation and the Institute for Media, Cognition and Communication (MCC), University of Copenhagen.

  2. 2.

    A second EU Technical Mission led by Frontex was also sent to Libya in 2007, all but reiterating the need for more collaboration with the Gaddafi regime.

  3. 3.

    Zusammenarbeit mit Libyen gegen Einwanderung wird konkret; Neue Zürcher Zeitung 03.06.2005.

References

  • Agamben, G. 1995. We refugees. Symposium 49(2): 114–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, G. 1998. Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, G. 2005. State of exception. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, J. 1994. The territorial trap: the geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy, 1(1): 51–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Amnesty International. 2010. Seeking safety, finding fear: Refugees, asylum-seekers and migrants in Libya and Malta. London: Amnesty International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at large. Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balzacq, T. 2009. Frontiers of governance: Understanding the external dimension of EU justice and home affairs. In The external dimension of EU justice and home affairs: Governance, neighbours, security, ed. T. Balzacq, 1–34. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, A. 2009. Forced migration and global politics. Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, A., and J. Milner. 2007. The externalisation of EU asylum policy: The position of African states. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigo, D. 2007. Detention of Foreigners, states of exception, and the social practices of control. In Borderscapes: Hidden geographies and politics at territory’s edge, ed. P.K. Rajaram and C. Grundy-Warr, 3–34. London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boswell, C. 2003. The ‘external dimension’ of EU immigration and asylum policy. International Affairs 79(3): 619–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brambilla, C. 2015. Exploring the critical potential of the borderscapes concept. Geopolitics 20(1): 14–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. 2010. The only thinkable figure? Ethical and normative approaches to refugees in international relations. In Refugees in international relations, ed. A. Betts and G. Loescher, 151–168. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassarino, J-P. 2010. Unbalanced Reciprocities: Cooperation on Readmission in the Euro-Mediterranean Area. The Middle East Institute, Special Edition, Viewpoints, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEAR. 2008. Informe de evaluación del Centro de Detención de migrantes en Nouadhibou (Mauritania). Bilbao: CEAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. 2005a. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament: On Regional Protection Programmes. 1.9.2005, Brussels. COM(2005) 388 final.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. 2005b. Technical Mission to Libya on Illegal Migration, November 27–December 6, 2004 Report, No. 7753/05. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities. 2010. Commission Memo: European Commission and Libya agree a Migration Cooperation agenda during high level visit to boost EU-Libya relations. 5.10.2010, Brussels, MEMO/10/472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union. 2005. 2664th Council meeting. Justice and Home Affairs. Luxembourg. 2–3 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlman, C., and G. Ó Thuathail. 2005. Broken Bosnia: Localized geopolitics of displacement and return in two Bosnian places. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95(3): 644–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danish Ministry of Justice. 2012. Discussion paper: Informal justice and home affairs ministers’ meeting. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danish Proposal. 1986. UN Third Committee, 39th meeting, 11 November 1986, UN Doc. A/C.3/41/SR.39. New York: United Nations Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Genova, N. 2010. Theoretical overview. In The deportation regime. Sovereignty, space and freedom of movement, ed. N. De Genova and N. Peutz, 33–68. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. 2002. Liberal government and authoritarianism. Economy and Society 31(1): 37–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Grande, G. 2009. Border Sahara: The detention centres in the Libyan Desert. Fortress Europe, [blog] January. Available at: http://fortresseurope.blogspot.com/2006/01/border-sahara-detention-centres-in.html. Accessed 16 Nov 2011.

  • Department of Migration and Home Affairs. 2013. Global approach to migration. [online] Brussels: European Commission. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/international-affairs/global-approach-to-migration/index_en.htm. Accessed 15 Nov 2013.

  • DG Home Affairs 2013. Global Approach to Migration and Mobility. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/homeaffairs/, accessed June 3rd, 2013.

  • Europeaid. 2006. Aeneas Programme: Programme for financial and technological assistance to third countries in the area of migration and asylum. Overview of projects funded 2004–2006. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 2007. Security, territory, population. Chippenham/Eastbourne: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 2008. The Birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collége de France, 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gammeltoft-Hansen, T. 2011. Access to Asylum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzini, C. 2009. Assessing Italy’s grande gesto to Libya. Middle East research and information project [online] 16 March. Available at: http://www.merip.org/mero/mero031609. Accessed 30 Nov 2015.

  • German Ministry of Interior. 2005. Effektiver Schutz für Flüchtlinge, wirkungsvolle Bekämpferung illegaler Migration. Berlin: Bundesministerium des Innern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibney, M. 2006. A Thousand Little Guantanamos: Western States and Measures to Prevent the Arrival of Refugees, in Tunstall, K. (ed.) Displacement, Asylum, Migration, Oxford Amnesty Lectures 2004. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, P. 2007. EU migration policy in the post-Amsterdam era: The contradictions between migrant ‘integration’, flexible labour immigration and refugee protection. In Irregular migration, informal labour and community: A challenge for Europe, ed. E. Berggren, 21–39. Maastricht: Shaker Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch. 2009. Pushed back, pushed around [online]. New York: Human Rights Watch. Available at: http://www.hrw.org/en/reports/2009/09/21/pushed-back-pushed-around. Accessed 12 May 2010.

  • Huysmans, J. 2006. The Politics of insecurity: Fear, migration and asylum in the EU. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Migration (IOM). 2011. Assessment mission finds migrants in remote Libyan Town of Al-Kufrah in need of help. [Press release] 16 August 2011. Available at: https://www.iom.int/news/assessment-mission-finds-migrants-remote-libyan-town-al-kufrah-need-help. Accessed 30 Nov 2015.

  • Lavenex, S. and Ucarer, E. 2004. The External Dimension of Europeanization: The Case of Immigration Policies. Cooperation and Conflict, 39(4): 417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavenex, S. & Wagner, W. 2007. Which European Public Order? Sources of Imbalance in the European Area of Freedom, Security and Justice, European Security, 16(3–4): 225–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemberg-Pedersen, M. 2011. Solidarity (In)action? Politik 14(4): 27–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemberg-Pedersen, M. 2012. Forcing flows of migrants: European externalization and border-induced displacement. In The border multiple: The practicing of borders between public policy and everyday life in Europe, ed. D. Andersen, M. Klatt, and M. Sandberg. London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemberg-Pedersen, M. 2013. Private security companies and the EU borderscapes. In The migration industry and the commercialization of international migration, ed. N. Nyberg Sørensen and T. Gammeltoft-Hansen. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, T. 2005. A zone of indistinction—A critique of Giorgio Agamben’s concept of biopolitics. Outlines. Critical Social Studies 7(1): 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucht, H. 2011. Darkness before daybreak: African migrants living on the margins in Southern Italy today. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minca, C. 2007. Agamben’s geographies of modernity. Political Geography 26: 78–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noll, G. 2003. Visions of the exceptional. European Journal of Migration and Law 5(3): 303–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O Thuathail, G. 1999. Borderless Worlds? Problematizing Discourses of De- territorialization. Geopolitics, 42(2): 139–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • O Thuathail, G. 1996. Critical Geopolitics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajaram, P.K., and C. Grundy-Warr (eds.). 2007a. Borderscapes: Hidden geographies and politics at territory’s edge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajaram, P.K., and C. Grundy-Warr. 2007b. Introduction. In Borderscapes: Hidden geographies and politics at territory’s edge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EUObserver. 2013. EU ‘civilian’ mission training paramilitaries in Libya. Euobserver [online] 18 November. Available at: https://euobserver.com/investigations/122134. Accessed 12 Oct 2015.

  • UK Government. 2003. A new vision for refugees [pdf]. London: UK Government. Available at: http://www.proasyl.de/texte/europe/union/2003/UK_NewVision.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2015.

  • van Houtum, H., and T. van Naerssen. 2002. Bordering, ordering and othering. Tjidschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 93(2): 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Munster, R. 2009. Securitizing immigration: The politics of risk in the EU. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan-Williams, N. 2009. Border politics: The limits of sovereign power. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A. and Glick Schiller, N. 2002. Methodological nationalism and beyond: nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4): 301–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeitung, Neue Zürcher. 2005. Zusammenarbeit mit Libyen gegen Einwanderung wird konkret. Neue Züricher Zeitung(3 June).

    Google Scholar 

European Union Official Documents

  • Commission and Parliament Communication COM/2005/388 of 1 September 2005 on Regional Protection Programmes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission Memo MEMO/10/472 of 5 October 2010 on the agreement between the European Commission and Libya on A migration cooperation agenda during high level visit to boost EU-Libya relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission Report 7753/05 of 2005 on The technical mission to Libya on Illegal Migration, November 27 –December 6, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Meeting 2463 14183/02 (Presse 350) of 18 Novembre 2002 on General affairs and external relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Note from Presidency to Council, 14366/3/05 REV 3, 2. of 6 December 2005 on a Strategy for the external dimension of JHAGlobal freedom, security and justice.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lemberg-Pedersen, M. (2017). Effective Protection or Effective Combat? EU Border Control and North Africa. In: Gaibazzi, P., Dünnwald, S., Bellagamba, A. (eds) EurAfrican Borders and Migration Management. Palgrave Series in African Borderlands Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94972-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics