Skip to main content

Contemporary First Nation Lawmaking: New Spaces for Aboriginal Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Indigenous Justice

Part of the book series: Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies ((PSLS))

  • 891 Accesses

Abstract

Undeniably, indigenous peoples within Canadian borders have advantages that indigenous peoples in many other parts of the world do not. Canada recognises First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples in its constitution. The Supreme Court of Canada has progressively strengthened Aboriginal authority over land, waters, and natural resources. Since the early 1990s, the provincial and federal governments of Canada have been involved in modern treaty-making to further enshrine the rights of Aboriginal communities with whom the Crown lacked historical agreements. And while progress has been variable, Canada is engaged in a process of reconciliation for some of the worse aspects of its colonial history. In 2008, for example, Canada offered an apology on behalf of Canadians for the Indian residential schools system and signed the Indian Residential Schools Settlement Agreement, providing redress to victims and establishing the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada. As the former UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples summarises in his 2013 country report, ‘Canada’s relationship with the indigenous peoples within its borders is governed by a well-developed legal framework that in many respects is protective of indigenous peoples’ rights’ (Anaya 2013, p. 5).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is not to say that colonisation in Canada was any less brutal or insidious than it was elsewhere. The settlement of Canada by European immigrants involved, among other practices, land grabs and other forms of asset stripping; the suppression of Indigenous ceremonies, languages, and other cultural practices; discrimination in access to employment; the removal of children to residential schools (where many were abused and large numbers died), and other injurious practices. See, for example, MacDonald and Steenbeek (2015).

  2. 2.

    The Canadian Constitution recognises three groups of Aboriginal peoples: First Nations peoples (‘Indians’), Inuit, and Métis (Constitution Act 1982, Part II, s.35(2)).

  3. 3.

    Among these are Delgamuukw v British Columbia ([1997] 3 S.C.R. 1010), Haida Nation v British Columbia (Minister of Forests) ([2004] 3 S.C.R. 511), and Tsilhqot’in Nation v British Columbia ([2014] 2 S.C.R. 256), which, respectively, established aboriginal title as a proprietary right, acknowledged Canadian governments’ formal duty to consult and to accommodate Indigenous interests, and affirmed aboriginal communities’ right to use, manage, and economically benefit from ‘unceded territory’. Also see Racette (2018).

  4. 4.

    Following Abele (2007), while this section analyzes a law—the Indian Act—the analysis itself is not a legal analysis. It is instead an ‘attempt to understand the logical implications of various provisions of the Indian Act for First Nations governance’ (Abele 2007, p. 3).

  5. 5.

    A similar (although less pointed) analysis can be found in Abele (2007), pp. 10–11.

  6. 6.

    In fact, one of the definitions of ‘bylaw’ is ‘an ordinance of a municipality or community’ (http://www.dictionary.com/browse/bylaw, date accessed July 25 2017).

References

Legislation and Cases

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jorgensen, M. (2018). Contemporary First Nation Lawmaking: New Spaces for Aboriginal Justice. In: Hendry, J., Tatum, M., Jorgensen, M., Howard-Wagner, D. (eds) Indigenous Justice. Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60645-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60645-7_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-60644-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-60645-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics