Advertisement

The Myth of Dutch Legal Culture

  • Marc Hertogh
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies book series (PSLS)

Abstract

This chapter lays out the empirical context of the book and reviews all major public opinion surveys from the past decade to analyze the public opinion climate in the Netherlands. There is a widely held belief—both among academics and policymakers—that strong popular support for the justice system is a prominent feature of Dutch legal culture. This image is usually based on surveys which focus exclusively on public trust. However, this chapter argues that when we consider all survey evidence (and not only those studies that focus on trust), the legitimacy of the Dutch justice system is no longer self-evident, but has become structurally contested. Contemporary Dutch legal culture is not characterized by ‘solid support’ but by ‘sullen toleration’ of the justice system.

Keywords

Methodology Public trust Surveys Legal culture Sullen toleration 

References

  1. Barendrecht, M., et al. (2017). Menselijk en rechtvaardig. Is de rechtsstaat er voor de burger? The Hague: HiiL. Available at: http://www.hiil.org/data/sitemanagement/media/HiiL%20Menselijk%20en%20rechtvaardig%20Launch%203%20mei%202017%20def.pdf.
  2. Beetham, D. (1991). The Legitimation of Power. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bijl, R., et al. (Eds.). (2015). De Sociale Staat van Nederland 2015. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
  4. Blankenburg, E. (1998). Patterns of Legal Culture: The Netherlands Compared to Neighboring Germany. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 46(1), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blankenburg, E. (2006). Dutch Legal Culture. In J. Chorus, et al. (Eds.), Introduction to Dutch Law (4th ed., pp. 13–52). Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
  6. Blankenburg, E., & Bruinsma, F. (1994). Dutch Legal Culture. Deventer and Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  7. Bovens, M., & Wille, A. (2008). Deciphering the Dutch Drop: Ten Explanations for Decreasing Political Trust in the Netherlands. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(2), 283–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cann, D., & Yates, J. (2008). Homegrown Institutional Legitimacy: Assessing Citizens. American Politics Research, 36(2), 297–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cotterrell, R. (1997). The Concept of Legal Culture. In D. Nelken (Ed.), Comparing Legal Cultures (pp. 13–31). Dartmouth: Aldershot.Google Scholar
  10. Croes, M. (2011). Heeft de burger vertrouwen in de rechter? In M. Hertogh & H. Weyers (Eds.), Recht van onderop: antwoorden uit de rechtssociologie (pp. 301–324). Nijmegen: Ars Aequi Libri.Google Scholar
  11. De Keijser, J., & Elffers, H. (2009). Cross-Jurisdictional Differences in Punitive Public Attitudes? European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15(1–2), 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Roos, Th. (2000). Het grote onbehagen: emotie en onbegrip over de rol van het strafrecht. Amsterdam: Balans.Google Scholar
  13. Dekker, P., & Van der Meer, T. (2007). Vertrouwen in de rechtspraak nader onderzocht. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
  14. Dekker, P., et al. (2004). Vertrouwen in de rechtspraak. Theoretische en empirische verkenningen voor een monitor. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
  15. Dekker, P., et al. (2015). Continue onderzoek burgerperspectieven (COB 2015/4). Den Haag: Sociaal en cultureel planbureau.Google Scholar
  16. Easton, D. (1965). A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Elffers, H., & De Keijser, J. (2008). Different Perspectives, Different Gaps. Does the General Public Demand a More Responsive Judge? In H. Kury (Ed.), Fear of Crime—Punitivity. New Developments in Theory and Research (pp. 447–470). Bochum: Universitätsverlag Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
  18. Ettema, A. (2008). De staat van het recht anno 2008. Amsterdam: TNS Nipo.Google Scholar
  19. Flash Eurobarometer. (2013). Justice in the EU (Flash Eurobarometer 385). European Commission. Available at: https://data.europa.eu/euodp/data/dataset/S1104_385.
  20. Friedman, L. (1975). The Legal System: A Social Science Perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  21. Friedman, L. (1997). The Concept of Legal Culture: A Reply. In D. Nelken (Ed.), Comparing Legal Cultures (pp. 33–40). Dartmouth: Dartmouth Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Friedman, L. (2006). The Place of Legal Culture in the Sociology of Law. In M. Freeman (Ed.), Law and Sociology (pp. 185–199). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gibson, J., & Caldeira, G. (1996). The Legal Cultures of Europe. Law & Society Review, 30(1), 55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gibson, J., Caldeira, G., & Baird, V. (1998). On the Legitimacy of National High Courts. American Political Science Review, 92(2), 343–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gibson, J., et al. (2003). Measuring Attitudes Toward the United States Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 354–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haley, J. (1978). The Myth of the Reluctant Litigant. Journal of Japanese Studies, 4(2), 359–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hertogh, M. (2011). Loyalists, Cynics and Outsiders. Who Are the Critics of the Justice System in the UK and the Netherlands? International Journal of Law in Context, 7(1), 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hertogh, M. (2012). The Curious Case of Dutch Legal Culture: A Reassessment of Survey Evidence. Journal of Comparative Law, 5(2), 146–168.Google Scholar
  29. Herz, J. (1978). Legitimacy: Can We Retrieve It? Comparative Politics, 10(3), 317–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hough, M., & Roberts, J. (2004). Confidence in Justice: An International Review. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  31. Hulst, J. (2017). Experimental Legal Studies on Perceived Procedural Justice and Trust in Law and Society. Ph.D. thesis, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam. Available at: https://research.vu.nl/en/publications/experimental-legal-studies-on-perceived-procedural-justice-and-tr.
  32. Jackson, J., & Gau, J. (2016). Carving Up Concepts? Differentiating Between Trust and Legitimacy in Public Attitudes Towards Legal Authority. In E. Schockley, et al. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Trust: Towards Theoretical and Methodological Integration (pp. 49–69). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Klijn, A., & Croes, M. (2007). Public Opinion on Lay Participation in the Criminal Justice System of the Netherlands—Some Tentative Findings from a Panel Survey. Utrecht Law Review, 3(2), 157–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Koomen, M. (2006). Lekenparticipatie in de strafrechtspraak. Het beeld van de Nederlandse bevolking. Amsterdam: TNS Nipo.Google Scholar
  35. Kurkchiyan, M. (2009). Russian Legal Culture: An Analysis of Adaptive Response to an Institutional Transplant. Law & Social Inquiry, 34(2), 337–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McEvily, B., & Tortoriello, M. (2011). Measuring Trust in Organisational Research: Review and Recommendations. Journal of Trust Research, 1(1), 23–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Metlay, D. (1999). Institutional Trust and Confidence: A Journey into a Conceptual Quagmire. In G. Cvetkovich & R. Lostedt (Eds.), Social Trust and the Management of Risk (pp. 100–116). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  38. Nelken, D. (2007). Defining and Using the Concept of Legal Culture. In E. Örücü & D. Nelken (Eds.), Comparative Law: A Handbook (pp. 109–132). Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. O’Neill, O. (2002). A Question of Trust: The BBC Reith Lectures 2002. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Parmentier, S., et al. (Eds.). (2004). Public Opinion and the Administration of Justice. Popular Perceptions and Their Implications for Policy-Making in Western Countries. Brussels: Politeia.Google Scholar
  41. Pelgrim, C., & Jensma, F. (2017, May 2). Rechtsstaat fantastisch voor juristen, slecht voor burgers. NRC Handelsblad.Google Scholar
  42. PytlikZillig, L., & Kimbrough, C. (2016). Consensus on Conceptualizations and Definitions of Trust: Are We There Yet? In E. Schockley, et al. (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Trust: Towards Theoretical and Methodological Integration (pp. 17–47). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rechtspraak. (2015). Jaarverslag Rechtspraak 2015. Available at: http://2015.jaarverslagrechtspraak.nl/.
  44. Roberts, J., & Hough, M. (2005). Understanding Public Attitudes to Criminal Justice. Maidenhead/New York: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Sarat, A. (1977). Studying American Legal Culture: An Assessment of Survey Evidence. Law & Society Review, 11(3), 427–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schnabel, P. (2008). Voorwoord. In P. Dekker & E. Van Steenvoorden (Eds.), Continue Onderzoek Burgerperspectieven (COB 2008/1) (pp. 1–3). Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
  47. Silbey, S. (2005). After Legal Consciousness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 1, 323–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tankebe, J., & Liebling, A. (Eds.). (2013). Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: An International Exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Thijssen, W. (2017, April 5). Nederlands rechtssysteem is vastgeroest. de Volkskrant.Google Scholar
  50. Ter Voert, M., & Klein Haarhuis, C. (2015). Geschilbeslechtingsdelta 2014. Over verloop en afloop van (potentieel) juridische problemen van burgers. Den Haag: WODC/Boom Juridische uitgevers.Google Scholar
  51. Toharia, J. (2003). Evaluating Systems of Justice Through Public Opinion: Why, What, Who, How, and What For? In E. Jensen & Y. Heder (Eds.), Beyond Common Knowledge: Empirical Approaches to The Rule of Law (pp. 21–62). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Tyler, T. (2006). Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press (reprint).Google Scholar
  53. Tyler, T. (Ed.). (2007). Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: An International Perspective. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  54. Tyler, T., & Huo, Y. (2002). Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  55. Tyler, T., & Jackson, J. (2013). Future Challenges in the Study of Legitimacy and Criminal Justice. In J. Tankebe & A. Liebling (Eds.), Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: An International Exploration (pp. 83–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Van de Walle, S., & Raine, J. (2008). Explaining Attitudes Towards Justice Systems in the UK and Europe. London: Ministry of Justice.Google Scholar
  57. Van Rossum, W., et al. (2012). Wraking bottom-up. Een empirisch onderzoek. Den Haag: Raad voor de rechtspraak.Google Scholar
  58. Van Spanje, J., & De Vreese, C. (2013). De rechtspraak in de media: drie negatieve trends. In D. Broeders, et al. (Eds.), Speelruimte voor transparantere rechtspraak (WRR-verkenning 26) (pp. 413–446). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Van Velthoven, B., & Klein Haarhuis, C. (2010). Geschilbeslechtingsdelta 2010. Over verloop en afloop van (potentieel) juridische problemen van burgers. WODC/Boom Juridische uitgevers.Google Scholar
  60. Weber, M. (1978 [1922]). Economy and Society (Guenther Roth and Claus Wittich Eds., Vol. 1). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  61. Westle, B. (2007). Political Beliefs and Attitudes: Legitimacy in Public Opinion Research. In A. Hurrelmann, et al. (Eds.), Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics (pp. 93–125). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Weyers, H., & Hertogh, M. (2007). Legitimiteit betwist: een verkennend literatuuronderzoek naar de ervaren legitimiteit van het justitieoptreden. Den Haag: WODC.Google Scholar
  63. WODC. (2015). Rechtspleging Civiel & Bestuur 2015. Available at: https://www.wodc.nl/cijfers-en-prognoses/rechtspleging-civiel-en-bestuur/.
  64. Zouridis, S. (2007). The Legitimacy of Law and the Justice System (paper for the study group on Law and Public Administration, European Group of Public Administration, Madrid 19–22 September 2007).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Socio-Legal Studies, Faculty of LawUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations