Skip to main content

Intermediality in Live Intermedial Practice: A Re-configuration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intermedial Praxis and Practice as Research
  • 323 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter addresses theories around intermediality in performance, placing such ideas and formulations directly in relation to live intermedial practice in order to understand how intermediality works in this particular practice. Firstly, definitions of intermediality in performance are discussed. Secondly, theories around the operation of intermediality—how it works—are addressed. Finally, what intermediality produces, specifically in terms of the nature of the experience generated, is considered. In each case, the theoretical frameworks are addressed through specific features and instances of live intermedial practice in order to reconfigure what intermediality in this practice is, does and produces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boenisch, P. (2006). Aesthetic art to aisthetic act: Theatre, media, intermedial performance. In F. Chapple & C. Kattenbelt (Eds.), Intermediality in theatre and performance (pp. 103–116). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolt, B. (2010). The magic is in the handling. In E. Barrett & B. Bolt (Eds.), Practice as research: Approaches to creative arts enquiry (pp. 27–34). London/New York: I.B.Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, F., & Kattenbelt, C. (Eds.). (2006). Intermediality in theatre and performance. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, G. (2010). Start making sense: Live audio-visual media performance. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media, 6(2), 193–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1978). Structure, sign and play in the discourse of the human sciences (A. Bass, Trans.). In Writing and difference. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elleström, L. (Ed.). (2010). Media borders, multimodality and intermediality. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etchells, T. (2012). Looking back: A conversation about presence, 2006. In G. Giannachi, N. Kaye, & M. Shanks (Eds.), Archaeologies of presence (pp. 183–194). New York/Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kattenbelt, C. (2006). Theatre as the art of the performer and the stage of intermediality. In F. Chapple & C. Kattenbelt (Eds.), Intermediality in theatre and performance (pp. 29–39). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kattenbelt, C. (2008). Intermediality in theatre and performance: Definitions, perceptions and medial relationships. Culture, Language and Representation: Cultural Studies Journal of Universitat Jaume I, VI, 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, S., & Zylinska, J. (2012). Life after new media: Mediation as a vital process. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klich, R., & Scheer, E. (2012). Multimedia performance. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavender, A. (2006). Mise en scene, hypermediacy and the sensorium. In C. Kattenbelt & F. Chapple (Eds.), Intermediality in theatre and performance (pp. 55–66). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, H. (2006). Postdramatic theatre (K. JĂĽrs-Munby, Trans.). Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. (1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. (2010). Prospective mapping. In S. Bay-Cheng, C. Kattenbelt, A. Lavender, & R. Nelson (Eds.), Mapping intermediality in performance (pp. 13–23). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxford University Press. (2014). Oxford Dictionaries. http://www.oxforddictionaries.com. Accessed 09 June 2014.

  • Power, C. (2008). Presence in play: A critique of theories of presence in the theatre. Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Paper Cinema. (2012a). The Paper Cinema website. http://thepapercinema.com. Accessed 19 May 2014.

  • The Paper Cinema. (2012b). The Odyssey. London: Battersea Arts Centre (13/02/12).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scott, J. (2016). Intermediality in Live Intermedial Practice: A Re-configuration. In: Intermedial Praxis and Practice as Research. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60234-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics