Advertisement

Heterodoxy

  • Erik Paul
Chapter
  • 164 Downloads

Abstract

Education is at the core of the struggle for democracy and a new political economy because of its critical role in making people who they are and who they will be in life. Heterodoxy contests the hegemonic political and economic ideology and the legitimacy of privileged groups that dominate Australian politics and economy. A major element is the well-being movement which brought together many Australians who reject the trappings and the social costs of material success exemplified by the ‘ReWorking Australia’ social movement to generate a public debate and activate for the reconstruction of an Australian political economy for the common good. These are joined by the union movement in Australia, which retains a strong core of progressive momentum in promoting economic and political equality.

Keywords

Education Economic rationalism Well-being Egalitarianism 

References

  1. ABC. (2004, February 22). Downshifting. ABC-TV compass. Australian Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar
  2. Butler, G., Jones, E., & Stilwell, F. (2009). Political economy now! Sydney: Darlington Press.Google Scholar
  3. Cahill, D. (2014, December 12). More and lots of it: Neoliberalism resilience in the face of crisis. Progress in Political Economy.Google Scholar
  4. Dauvergne, P., & LeBaron, G. (2014). Protest, Inc: The corporatization of activism. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hamilton, C. (1999, February 24). Economic growth: The dark side of the Australian dream. Paper presented to the Horizons of Science Forum, University of Technology.Google Scholar
  6. Hamilton, C. (2002). Economics in the age of consumer capitalism. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 50, 131–136.Google Scholar
  7. Hamilton, C. (2003a, March). Downshifting in Australia. The Australia Institute News, 34.Google Scholar
  8. Hamilton, C. (2003b). Growth Fetish. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  9. Hamilton, C. (2006). What’s left? The death of social democracy. Quarterly Essay, 21.Google Scholar
  10. Hamilton, C., & Mail, E. (2003) Downshifting in Australia. The Australia Institute, Discussion Paper No. 50, January.Google Scholar
  11. Hirst, M. (2009). Nurturing activism on campus and beyond. In G. Butler, E. Jones, & F. Stilwell (Eds.), Political economy now! Sydney, Australia: Darlington Press.Google Scholar
  12. Oxfam. (2015). The suffering of others: The human cost of the International Finance Corporation’s lending through financial intermediaries. Oxfam Issue Briefing, April. Melbourne.Google Scholar
  13. Panitch, L. (2014). Wheelwright lecture 2014: Whose crisis? Journal of Australian Political Economy, 74.Google Scholar
  14. Perelman, M. (2015). How economics bolstered power by obscuring it. In State of power 2015. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Transnational Institute. Retrieved from http://www.tni.org.
  15. RWA. (1993). The curse of economic rationalism. ReWorking Australia Movement, 1(2).Google Scholar
  16. Schroeder, S., & Chester, L. (Eds.). (2014). Challenging the orthodoxy: Reflections on Frank Stilwell’s contribution to political economy. Sydney, Australia: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Stilwell, F. (1995). Reworking Australia. In S. Rees & G. Rodley (Eds.), The human costs of managerialism. Sydney, Australia: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  18. Stilwell, F. (2011/12). Marketising the environment. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 68.Google Scholar
  19. TAI. (2003). The wellbeing manifesto. Canberra: The Australia Institute.Google Scholar
  20. TJNA. (2014). Who pays for our common wealth? Tax practices of the ASX 200. Melbourne, Australia: Tax Justice Network Australia.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Paul
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Peace and Conflict StudiesUniversity of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations