Skip to main content
  • 214 Accesses

Abstract

Australian progressive movements and formations are engaged in a major struggle against the country’s neoliberal hegemonic power but their forces are fragmented, lacking a unified and coherent front to challenge the neoliberal corporate and security project. The existing hegemonic order is on the ascendancy, with no alternative to endless economic growth, regardless of the cost to the social fabric of society and the poisoning of the human habitat. Under what circumstances are progressive movements likely to grow and join forces in Australia and successfully challenge the hegemony of the neoliberal corporate security state? It requires the emergence of universal junctures and points of convergence which can weld progressive movements in a common cause, such as the existential threat of climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    1. The acronym SLAPP stands for Strategic Litigation Against Public Participation.

  2. 2.

    2. The politics of panic and fear is a dominant theme in the political life of Australia since the invasion and occupation of the continent. After the ‘yellow peril’ and Communism came the ‘war on terror’ and the fear of Islam. Greg Barns argues that ‘the consequences of the Abbott’s scarce politics will be increased harassment of Australians from the Middle East and of Muslims’ (Barns, 2014). Among the interrelated aspects of the politics of fear is the secrecy and deceptions in the government’s control of information to manufacture consent in its military operations in the Middle East and elsewhere in the world. A case study is the Abbott government’s management of information about the level of killing inflicted by the Australian Defence Force in its operations against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) (Loewenstein 2015).

  3. 3.

    3. The manipulation of morality by the state is a topic discussed at length in Zygmunt Bauman’s Modernity and the Holocaust, where he writes: ‘Morality is not a product of society. Morality is something society manipulates—exploits, re-directs, jams’ (Bauman, 2000:183). In her work Agonistics, Chantal Mouffe writes:

    Morality has been promoted to the position of a master narrative; as such, it replaces discredited political and social discourses as a framework for collective action.Morality is rapidly becoming the only legitimate vocabulary: we are not urged to think not in terms of right and left, but of right and wrong. The displacement of politics by morality means that there is now no properly ‘agonistic’ debate in the democratic political public sphere about possible alternatives to the existing hegemonic order; as a consequence, this sphere has been seriously weakened. Hence the growing disaffection with liberal democratic institutions, a disaffection which manifest itself in declining electoral participation. (Mouffe, 2002:1)

    4. Bauman and others are concerned about the hidden possibilities of a modern society to commit mass slaughter. These possibilities exist because of the creation of conditions, including the manipulation of emotions involving mass fear and humiliation, which make it possible for a modern society to engage in the mass killing of others (Bauman, 2000; Moїsi, 2009; Young, 1999).

  4. 4.

    5. An example is the installation and funding by the Howard government and wealthy and influential conservative individuals of the US Studies Centre at the University of Sydney (Paul, 2012:38).

References

  • Anderson, P. (1998). The origins of postmodernity. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ANU-SRC. (2014, August 12). ANU builds social research capacity, finds decline in satisfaction with democracy. Canberra: Australian National University-Social Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barns, G. (2014, September 12). Beware the politics of panic in terror alerts. The Drum, ABC TV. Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2000). Modernity and the holocaust. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2005). The demons of the open society. Presentation at the London School of Economics, 20 October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, A. (2010). Living on borrowed time. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. (2006). American nightmare. Political Theory, 34(6), 690–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, G., Jones, E., & Stilwell, F. (2009). Political economy now! Sydney: Darlington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (2011). The strange non-death of neo liberalism. London: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duménil, G., & Lévy, D. (2005). The neoliberal (counter-) revolution. In A. Saad-Filho & D. Johnston (Eds.), Neoliberalism: A critical reader. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duménil, G., & Lévy, D. (2011). The crisis of neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerton, P. (2006). Australia’s terrorism offence – A case against. In A. Lynch & G. Williams (Eds.), What price security? Taking stock of Australia’s anti-terror laws. Sydney, Australia: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (2013). A triple movement? New Left Review, 81, 119–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2013). Contesting capitalism in the light of the crisis: A conversation with David Harvey. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 71, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocking, J. (2003). Counter-terrorism and the criminalisation of politics: Australia’s new security powers of detention, proscription and control. Australian Journal of Politics and History, 49(3), 355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, H.-F. (2014). Canadianization? New Left Review, 88, 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johns, F. (2014). The turn to data analytics and international law. European Society of International Law, 3, 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2004). The sorrows of empire: Militarism, secrecy, and the end of the republic. New York: Metropolitan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, M. (2014, October 10). Ulterior motives show in push for new penalties. Sydney Morning Herald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. (2008). The shock doctrine. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, M. (2008). A thriving Asian studies is integral to a critical liberal humanities program. University of Sydney, Max Lane blog on Indonesia, Southeast Asia and International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, A. (2015, August 6). Australia against ISIS: How much do we actually know? The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (2002). Politics and passions: The stakes of democracy. London: Centre for the Study of Democracy. University of Westminster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moїsi, D. (2009). The geopolitics of emotion. London: The Bodley Head.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M. (2014a, August 11). Apathetic Aussies. ABC News. Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M. (2014b, August 12). Poll data reveals Australia’s waning interest in politics, decline in support for democracy. ABC News. Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panitch, L., & Gindin, S. (2013). The making of global capitalism: The political economy of American empire. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, E. (2012). Neoliberal Australia and US imperialism in East Asia. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rainford, J. (2014, August 30). Australians think democracy is failing. Green Left Weekly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusbridger, A. (2015, March 13). Why we are putting the climate threat to Earth front and centre. Guardian Weekly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sentas, V. (2014). Traces of terror: Counter-terrorism, policing and race. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, B. (2003). Slapping on the writs: Defamation, developers and community activism. Briefing Series, Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. (2014, December 15). Blood on many hands in CIA torture scandal. Sydney Morning Herald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, N. (2007, April 25). Fascist America, in 10 easy steps. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. (1999). The exclusive society: Social exclusion, crime and differences in late modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paul, E. (2016). Struggle for Democracy. In: Australian Political Economy of Violence and Non-Violence. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60214-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics