Advertisement

Theoretical Overview: Comparative Media Studies and the Lebanese State

Chapter
  • 226 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter discusses the theoretical underpinnings of the work, which would inform the rest of the monograph. Previous attempts at comparative studies in the field of media and communications are assessed. In particular, the seminal work by Hallin and Mancini; their four dimensions of state role, political parallelism, professionalization and media market; and their three models—the Polarized Pluralist, the Democratic Corporatist and Liberal models—are critically assessed. In the second part of this chapter, El-Richani explains the social, political and historical context of Lebanon, as this has a direct impact on its media system. Relevant political concepts such as weak states and small states are also discussed.

Keywords

Hallin and Mancini Comparing media systems State size Weak states Lebanon State role Political parallelism Professionalization and media market Polarized Pluralist model The Democratic Corporatist model Liberal model 

Bibliography

  1. Aalberg, T., van Aelst, P., & Curran, J. (2010). Cross-national comparison media systems and the political information environment. International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(3), 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrams, P. (2007). Notes on the difficulty of studying the state. In A. Sharma & A. Gupta (Eds.), Blackwell Readers in Anthropology: Vol. 9. The Anthropology of the State. A Reader (pp. 112–130). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  3. AbuKhalil, A. (1998). Historical Dictionary of Lebanon. Asian Historical Dictionaries: Vol. 30. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar
  4. Abu-Rabi’, I. M. (2004). Contemporary Arab Thought: Studies in Post-1967 Arab Intellectual History. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  5. Acemoglu, D. (2005). Politics and economics in weak and strong states. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52, 1199–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ajami, F. (1986). The Vanished Imam: Musa al Sadr and the Shia of Lebanon. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Allan, S., & Zelizer, B. (Eds). (2004). Reporting War: Journalism in Wartime. Oxford, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Amin, H. (2002). Freedom as a value in Arab media: Perceptions and attitudes among journalists, Political Communication, 19(2), 125–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Anderson, B. (1992). The new world disorder. New Left Review, 193, 3–13.Google Scholar
  10. Balčytienė, A. (2009). Market-led reforms as incentives for media change, development and diversification in the Baltic states: A small country approach. The International Communication Gazette, 71(1–2), 29–49.Google Scholar
  11. Benhabib, S. (1992). Models of public space: Hannah Arendt, the liberal tradition, and Jürgen Habermas. In C. Calhoun (Ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 7398Google Scholar
  12. Bennet, L. & Livingston, S. (2003). Editor’s introduction: A semi-independent press: Government control and journalistic autonomy in the political construction of news. Political Communication, 20(4), 359–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Benson, R. (2011). Futures of the news: International considerations and further reflections. In N. Fenton (Ed.), New Media, Old News. Journalism and Democracy in the Digital Age (pp. 187–200). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Bertrand, C.-J. (1997). Quality Control: Media Ethics and Accountability Systems. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  15. Bertrand, C.-J. (2005). Introduction: Media accountability. Pacific Journalism Review, 11(2), 5–16.Google Scholar
  16. Blum, R. (2007). Ein europäisches Modell für die Struktur der Ethikinstitutionen? Zeitschrift für Kommunikationsökologie und Medienethik, 9, 76–82.Google Scholar
  17. Blumler, J. G. (2005). Political communication systems all change. A response to Kees Brant. In D. McQuail, P. Golding, & E. de Bens (Eds.), Communication Theory & Research. An ECJ anthology (pp. 118–124). London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Blumler, J. G. & Gurevitch, M. (2000). Rethinking the study of political communication. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass Media and Society (3rd ed., pp. 155–172). London, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  20. Bourdieu, P. (2005). The political field, the social field, and the journalistic field. In R. Benson & E. Neveu (Eds.), Bourdieu and the Journalistic Field (pp. 29–46). Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  21. Boyd-Barett, O. (2009). Changing paradigms of media research and practice in contexts of globalisation and terror. In D.K. Thussu (Ed.), Internationalizing Media Studies (pp. 116–130). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Brants, K. (1998). Who’s afraid of infotainment? European Journal of Communication, 13, 305–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Broadcasters’ Audience Research Board (2013). Trends in Television Viewing 2012. London: BARB. Retrieved from http://www.barb.co.uk/file/download/resources/trends-in-tv/BARB+Trends+in+Television+Viewing+2013.pdf.Google Scholar
  24. Calhoun, C. (1992). Introduction. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere (pp. 1–50). Cambridge, Mass.: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
  25. Carpentier, N. & Cammaerts, B. (2006). Hegemony, democracy, agonism and journalism: An interview with Chantal Mouffe. Journalism Studies, 7(6), 964–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Cooper, T. (1990). Comparative international media ethics. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 5(1), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Cunningham, R. & Sarayrah, Y. K. (1993). Wasta: The Hidden Force in Middle Eastern Society. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
  28. Curran, J. (1991). Rethinking the media as a public sphere. In Peter Dahlgren and Colin Sparks (Eds.), Communication and Citizenship, (pp. 27–57). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Curran, J. (1998). Crisis of public communication: A reappraisal. In T. Liebes and J. Curran (Eds.), Media, Ritual and Identity (pp. 175–202). London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Curran, J. (Ed.) (2000a). Media Organisations in Society. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  31. Curran, J. (2000b). Rethinking media and democracy. In J. Curran & M. Gurevitch (Eds.), Mass Media and Society (3rd ed., pp. 122–154). London, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Curran, J. (2007, November). Global media systems, public knowledge and democracy. Public Lecture conducted from London School of Economics and Political Science, London. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/newsAndMedia/videoAndAudio/channels/publicLecturesAndEvents/player.aspx?id=265.Google Scholar
  33. Curran, J., Iyengar, S., Lund, A. B. & Salovaara-Moring, I. (2009). Media system, public knowledge and democracy: A comparative study. European Journal of Communication, 24(1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. d’Haenens, L., Antoine, F., & Saeys, F. (2009). Belgium: Two communities with diverging views on how to manage media diversity. The International Communication Gazette, 71(1–2), 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dodds, K. (2007). Geopolitics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Donsbach, W., & Patterson, T. E. (2004). Political news journalists: Partisanship, professionalism, and political roles in five countries. In F. Esser & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Communication, Society, and Politics. Comparing Political Communication. Theories, Cases, and Challenges (pp. 251–270). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Downing, J. D. H. (1996). Internationalizing Media Theory: Transition, Power, Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Durkheim, E. (1982). The Rules of Sociological Method. New York: The Free Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Eberwein, T., Fengler, S., Lauk, E., & Leppik-Bork, T. (Eds.) (2011). Mapping Media Accountability in Europe and Beyond. Cologne: Herbert von Halem Verlag.Google Scholar
  40. Edelstein, A. S. (1982). Comparative Communication Research. Beverly Hills, California, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. El Khazen, F. (1991). The Communal Pact of National Identities: The Making and Politics of the 1943 National Pact. Oxford: Centre for Lebanese Studies.Google Scholar
  42. El Khazen, F. (2003). Political parties in postwar Lebanon: Parties in search of partisans. The Middle East Journal, 57(4), 605–624.Google Scholar
  43. Eley, G. (1992). Nations, publics, and political cultures: Placing Habermas in the nineteenth century. In C.C Alhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 109–142.Google Scholar
  44. El-Nawawy, M. & Iskandar, A. (2002). The minotaur of ‘contextual objectivity’: War coverage and the pursuit of accuracy with appeal. Transnational Broadcasting Studies, 9 (fall/winter). Retrieved from http://tbsjournal.arabmediasociety.com/Archives/Fall02/Iskandar.html .
  45. Elstein, D. (2001, August 15). Neither history nor mystery but reality [Web log post]. Retrieved from http://www.opendemocracy.net/media-publicservice/article_49.jsp.Google Scholar
  46. Entman, R. (2001). The American Media and Race Relations in an Interdependent World. Washington, DC: Shorenstein Center Conference on Race and the Press.Google Scholar
  47. Eriksen, S. S. (2010). The theory of failure and the failure of theory: “state failure” in theory and practice. In K.B. Harpviken (Ed.), Troubled Regions and Failing States: The Clustering and Contagion of Armed Conflicts (pp. 27–50). Bingley: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Erk, J. (2003). Wat we zelf doen, doen we beter: Belgian substate nationalisms, congruence and public policy. Journal of Public Policy, 23(2), 201–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Esser, F., & Hanitzsch, T. (2012). On the why and how of comparative inquiry in communication studies. In F. Esser & Hanitzsch, T. (Eds.), Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (pp. 3–22). Hoboken: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  50. Esser, F., & Pfetsch, B. (2004). Comparing political communication: Reorientations in a changing world. In F. Esser & Pfetsch, B. (Eds.), Communication, Society, and Politics. Comparing Political Communication. Theories, Cases, and Challenges (pp. 3–22). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  51. European Commission (2012). Media Use in the European Union. Standard Eurobarometer 78. Brussels: EU Directorate-General Communication.Google Scholar
  52. Evers, H. & Everwein, T. (2011). Can a million toothless tigers make a difference? Potentials and pitfalls of web-based accountability processes in German journalism. MediaAct Working Paper. Tampere: Journalism Research and Development Centre, University of Tampere. Retrieved from http://www.mediaact.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/WP4/WP4_Germany.pdf.Google Scholar
  53. Fakhoury Mühlbacher, T. (2009). Democratisation and Power-Sharing in Stormy Weather: The Case of Lebanon. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Fenton, N. (Ed.) (2011). New Media, Old News: Journalism and Democracy in the Digital Age. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Ferre, J. P. (2009). A short history of media ethics in the United States. In L. Wilkins, & C. G. Christians (Eds.), The Handbook of Mass Media Ethics (pp. 15–27). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Firro, K. M. (2003). Inventing Lebanon: Nationalism and the State under the Mandate. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  57. Foucault, M. (2002). Power. Essential works of Foucault: Vol. 3. (J.D. Faubion, Trans.). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  58. Fraser, N. (1992) Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In Calhoun, C. (Ed.) Habermas and the Public Sphere (pp. 109–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  59. Frith, S. (2000). Entertainment. In J. Curran, & M. Gurevitch (Eds.). Mass Media and Society (3rd edition, pp. 201–217). London, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Goldsmiths Media Group (2000). Media organisations in society: Central issues. In J. Curran (Ed.), Media Organisations in Society (pp. 19–65). London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  61. Graafland, J. J. (2007). Economics, Ethics and the Market: Introduction and Applications. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  62. Groenhart, H. (2011). Between Hope and Fear: Distinctiveness of Media Accountability Online in the Netherlands. University of Tampere: Journalism Research and Development Centre. Retrieved from http://www.mediaact.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/WP4/MediaAcT_Working_Paper_Netherlands.pdf.
  63. Groseclose, T., & Milyo, J. (2005). A measure of media bias. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4), 1191–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Guelke, A. (2012). Politics in Deeply Divided Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  65. Gurevitch, M., & Blumler, J. G. (2004). State of the art of comparative political communication research: Poised for maturity? In F. Esser, & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Communication, Society, and Politics. Comparing Political Communication. Theories, Cases, and Challenges (pp. 325–343). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Habermas, J. (1991). The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
  67. Habermas, J. (1981). Reason and the Rationalization of Society [Theory of Communicative Action 1]. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  68. Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Hafez, K. (2002a). International vergleichende Medienforschung: Eine unterentwickelte Forschungsdimension. In K. Hafez (Ed.), Die Zukunft der internationalen Kommunikationswissenschaft in Deutschland (pp. 59–94). Hamburg: Deutsches Übersee-Institut.Google Scholar
  70. Hafez, K. (2002b). Journalism ethics revisited: A comparison of ethics codes in Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, and Muslim Asia. Political Communication, 19(2), 225–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Hafez, K. (2007). The Myth of Media Globalization. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  72. Hafez, K. (2008a). European-Middle Eastern relations in the Media Age. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication, 1(1), 30–48.Google Scholar
  73. Hafez, K. (2008c). The unknown desire for “objectivity”: Journalism ethics in Arab (and Western) journalism. In K. Hafez (Ed.), Arab Media. Power and Weakness (pp. 147–164). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  74. Hafez, K. (2009). Let’s improve ‘global journalism’! Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism, 10(3), 329–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Hafez, K. (Ed.) (2003). Media Ethics in the Dialogue of Cultures. Journalistic Self-Regulation in Europe, the Arab World, and Muslim Asia. Hamburg: Deutsches Orient-Institut.Google Scholar
  76. Hall, S. (1997). The work of representation. In S. Hall (Ed.), Representation: Cultural Representations and Significant Practices (pp. 13–74). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  77. Halliday, F. (2005). The Middle East in International Relations: Power, Politics and Ideology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Hallin, D. C. & Papathanassopoulos, S. (2002). Political clientelism and the media: Southern Europe and Latin America in comparative perspective. Media Culture Society, 24(2), 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Hallin, D. C. (2013). Between reporting and propaganda: Power, culture and war reporting. In J. Seethaler, G.M. Karmasin, & R. Woehlert (Eds.), The Role of the Mass Media in Hostile Conflicts from World War I to the “War on Terror” (pp. 93–106). Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
  80. Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing Media Systems: Three Models of Media and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2012). Conclusion. In D. C. Hallin, & P. Mancini (Eds.), Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World (pp. 278–304). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Hallin, D. C., & Papathanassopoulos, S. (2002). Political clientelism and the media: Southern Europe and Latin America in comparative perspective. Media, Culture and Society, 24(2), 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Hanf, T. (1990). Koexistenz im Krieg. Staatszerfall und Entstehen einer Nation im Libanon. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
  84. Hanitzsch, T. (2005). Journalism research in Germany: Origins, theoretical innovations and future outlook. Brazilian Journalism Research, 2(1), 39–53.Google Scholar
  85. Hanitzsch, T. (2007). Deconstructing journalism culture: Toward a universal theory. Communication Theory, 17, 367–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Hanitzsch, T., & Donsbach, W. (2012). Comparing journalism cultures. In F. Esser, & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (pp. 262–275). Hoboken: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  87. Hanitzsch, T., Hanusch, F., Mellado, C., Anikina, M. , Berganza, R., Cangoz, I., Coman, M., Basyouni, H., Hernandez, M.E., Kardjov, C.D., Moreira, S.V., Mwesige, P.G., Plaisance, P.L., Reich, Z., Seethaler, J., Skewes, E.A., Noor, D.V., & Wang Yuen, E.K. (2011). Mapping journalism cultures across nations: A comparative study of 18 countries. Journalism Studies, 12(3), 273–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Hardy, J. (2008). Western Media Systems. Communication and Society. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  89. Hardy, J. (2012). Comparing media systems. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (pp. 185–206). Hoboken: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  90. Haugbølle, S. (2010). War and Memory in Lebanon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Hepp, A. (2009). Transculturality as a perspective: Researching media cultures comparatively. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 10(1), Art. 26, Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0901267.Google Scholar
  92. Hepp, A., & Couldry, N. (2009). What should comparative media research be comparing? Towards a transcultural approach to ‘media cultures’. In D. K. Thussu (Ed.), Internationalizing Media Studies (pp. 32–47). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  93. Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing Consent. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  94. Herman, E. S., & McChesney, R. W. (2004). The Global Media: The New Missionaries of Corporate Capitalism. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  95. Hirst, D. (2010). Beware of Small States: Lebanon, Battleground of the Middle East. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  96. Hourani, A. H. (1946). Syria and Lebanon: A Political Essay. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Hourani, A. H. (1985). Political Society in Lebanon: A Historical Introduction. London: Centre for Lebanese Studies.Google Scholar
  98. Humphreys, P. (1996). Mass Media and Media Policy in Western Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Humphreys, P. (2012). A political scientist’s contribution to the comparative study of media systems in Europe: A response to Hallin and Mancini. In N. Just, & M. Puppis (Eds.), Trends in Communication Policy Research: New Theories, Methods and Subjects (pp.157–176). Bristol; Chicago, IL: Intellect.Google Scholar
  100. Iskandar, A. (2007). Lines in the sand: Problematizing Arab media in the post-taxonomic era. Arab Media and Society, 2. Retrieved from http://www.arabmediasociety.com/index.php?article=226&p=1.
  101. Jackson, R. H. (1990). Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Jay, A. &, Lynn, J. (Writers), & Whitmore, P. (Director) (1982). Yes Minister: The Middle-Class Rip-Off [Television series]. London: BBC.Google Scholar
  103. Just, N. (2009). Measuring media concentration and diversity: New approaches and instruments in Europe and the US. Media Culture & Society, 31(1), 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Karppinen, K. (2007). Against naïve pluralism in media politics: On the implications of the radical-pluralist approach to the public sphere. Media Culture & Society, 29(3), 495–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Karppinen, K. (2009). Rethinking media pluralism and communicative abundance. Observatorio (OBS), 3(4), 151–169.Google Scholar
  106. Karppinen, K. (2013). Rethinking Media Pluralism. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Kelly, D. (2000). Between description and explanation in state theory: Rethinking Marx and Weber. Journal of Historical Sociology, 13(2), 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Kerr, M. (2006). Imposing Power-Sharing: Conflict and Coexistence in Northern Ireland and Lebanon. Dublin: Irish Acad. Press.Google Scholar
  109. Khalaf, S. (1977). Changing forms of political patronage in Lebanon. In E. Gellner, & J. Waterbury (Eds.), Patrons and Clients in Mediterranean Societies (pp. 185–205). Indianapolis: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  110. Kingston, P. W. T. (2004). States-within-states: Historical and theoretical perspectives: Introduction. In P. W. T. Kingston, & I. S. Spears (Eds.), States-Within-States. Incipient Political Entities in the Post-Cold War Era (pp. 1–13). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  111. Kingston, P. W.T., Zahar, M-J. (2004). Rebuilding a house of many mansions. The rise and fall of militia cantons in Lebanon. In P. W. T Kingston, & I. Spears, (Eds.). States-Within-States. Incipient Political Entities in the Post-Cold War Era (pp. 81–97). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  112. Kiwan, F. (1993). The formation of Lebanese civil society. The Beirut Review, (6). Retrieved from http://www.ldn-lb.org/details.aspx?id=166.Google Scholar
  113. Klaehn, J. (2005). A critical review and assessment of Herman and Chomsky’s ‘propaganda model’. In D. McQuail, P. Golding, & E. de Bens (Eds.), Communication Theory & Research. An ECJ Anthology (pp. 139–153). London; Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  114. Kleinsteuber, H. J. (2004). Comparing mass communication systems: Media formats, media contents, and media processes. In F. Esser, & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Communication, Society, and Politics. Comparing Political Communication. Theories, Cases, and Challenges (pp. 64–86). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Kraft, M., Al-Mazri, M., Wimmen, H., & Zupan, N. (2008). Walking the Line: Strategic Approaches to Peacebuilding in Lebanon. Bonn: Working Group on Development and Peace “FriEnt”; Forum Civil Peace Service “forum ZFD”; German Development Service; Heinrich Böll Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.frient.de/downloads/Libanon_Study_fin.pdf.Google Scholar
  116. Kraidy, M. M. (2005b). Globalization avant la lettre? Cultural hybridity and media power in Lebanon. In P. D. Murphy, & M. M. Kraidy (Eds.), Global Media Studies. Ethnographic Perspectives (pp. 276–295). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  117. Kraidy, M., & Khalil, J. (2009). Arab Television Industries. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Krasner, S.D. (2004). Sharing sovereignty: New institutions for collapsed and failing states. International Security, 29(2), 85–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Krasner, S. D., & Pascual, C. (2005). Addressing state failure. Foreign Affairs, 84(4), 153–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Künzler, M. (2009). Switzerland: Desire for diversity without regulation – a paradoxical case. International Communication Gazette, 71(1–2), 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. La Porte, T., Medina, M., & Sádaba, T. (2007). Globalization and pluralism: The function of public television in the European audiovisual market. The International Communication Gazette, 69(4), 377–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Laitila, T. (2005). Journalistic codes of ethics in Europe. In D. McQuail, P. Golding, & E. de Bens (Eds.). Communication Theory & Research. An ECJ Anthology (pp. 191–204). London, Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Lang, K. (1996). The European roots. In D.E. Dennis, & E. Wartella (Eds.), The Remembered History (pp. 1–20). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  124. Leveson, J. (2012). A Report into the Culture, Practices and Ethics of the Press: Remarks by Lord Justice Leveson, Thursday 29 November 2012. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140122145147/http:/www.levesoninquiry.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Remarks-by-Lord-Justice-Leveson-29-November-2012.pdf.Google Scholar
  125. Lichtenberg, J. (2000). In defence of objectivity revisited. In Curran, J., & M. Gurevitch (Eds.) Mass Media and Society (pp. 238–255). London, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  126. Lijphart, A. (1988). A Mediterranean model of democracy? The Southern European democracies in comparative perspective. West European Politics, 11(1), 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Lijphart, A. (2002). Negotiation democracy versus consensus democracy: Parallel conclusions and recommendations. European Journal of Political Research, 41, 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Lijphart, A. (2008). Thinking About Democracy: Power Sharing and Majority Rule in Theory and Practice. London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  129. Lorwin, V. R. (1971). Segmented pluralism: Ideological cleavages and political cohesion in the smaller European democracies. Comparative Politics, 3(2), pp. 141–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Luther, C.A., Lepre, C. R., & Clark, N. (2012). Diversity in the U.S. Media. Malden, MA & Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  131. Maass, M. (2009). The elusive definition of the small state. International Politics, 46, 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Mancini, P. (2000). How to combine media commercialization and party affiliation: The Italian experience. Political Communication, 17(4), 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. McCargo, D. (2012). Partisan polyvalence: Characterising the political role of Asian media. In D. C. Hallin & P. Mancini (Eds.), Comparing Media Systems Beyond the Western World (pp. 201–223). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  134. McChesney, R. W. (2003). The problem of journalism: A political economic contribution to an explanation of the crisis in contemporary US journalism. Journalism Studies, 4(3), 299–329.Google Scholar
  135. McDevitt, M. (2006). In defense of autonomy: A critique of the public journalism critique. The Journal of Communication, 53(1), 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. McQuail, D. (2005a). Accountability of media to society: Principles and means. In D. McQuail, P. Golding, & E. de Bens (Eds.), Communication Theory & Research. An ECJ Anthology (pp. 89–102). London; Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  137. McQuail, D. (2005c). Introduction and overview. In D. McQuail, P. Golding, & E. de Bens (Eds.), Communication Theory & Research. An ECJ Anthology (pp. 1–11). London; Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  138. Media Diversity Institute, International Federation of Journalists & Article 19 (2012). Getting the Facts Right. Reporting Ethnicity and Religion: A study of Media Coverage of Ethnicity and Religion in Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Lithuania, Slovakia and the United Kingdom. Belgium: Rupar, Verica. Retrieved from http://www.media-diversity.org/en/additional-files/documents/b-studies-reports/EJI_study_FINAL%20for%20Web.pdf.
  139. Mellado, C. & Humanes, M.L. (2012). Modelling perceived professional autonomy in Chilean journalism. Journalism, 13(8), 985–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. Migdal, J. S. (2001) State in Society: Studying How States and Societies Transform and Constitute one another. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. Migrant Voice. (2014). Migrant Voice UK Media-Monitoring Research: Migrant Voices in Migration Stories. Retrieved from http://www.media-diversity.org/en/additional-files/229372612-Migrants-Invisible-in-UK-Media.pdf.
  142. Mill, J. S. (2006). Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
  143. Milton-Edwards, B., & Hinchcliffe, P. (2008). Conflicts in the Middle East since 1945 (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  144. Mitchell, T. (2007). Society economy and the state effect. In A. Sharma, & A. Gupta (Eds.), Blackwell Readers in Anthropology: Vol. 9. The Anthropology of the State. A Reader (pp. 169–186). Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  145. Molotch, H. L., Protess, D. L., & Gordon, M. T. (1987). The media-policy connections: Ecologies of news. In D. L. Paletz (Ed.), Political Communication Research: Approaches, Studies, Assessments (pp. 26–48). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  146. Money-Kyrle, O. (2005). Professional ethical standards and journalists’ rights. In Article 19 (Ed.), Conference Report on Freedom and Accountability – Conference on Media Self-Regulation in South-East Europe. London: Article 19.Google Scholar
  147. Mouffe, C. (1993). The Return of the Political. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  148. Mouffe, C. (2000). The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  149. Mouffe, C. (2005). On the Political: Thinking in Action. Abingdon & New York: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  150. Mueller, J. E. (1970). Presidential popularity from Truman to Johnson. The American Political Science Review, 64(1), 18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. Murdock, G., Dahlgren, P., & Wieten, J. (2000). Television Across Europe: A Comparative Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  152. Najem, T.P. (2005). Lebanon and Europe: The foreign policy of a penetrated state. In G. Nonneman (Ed.), Analyzing Middle East Foreign Policies and the Relationship with Europe (pp. 100–122). Oxford, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  153. Newton, K., & van Deth, J.W. (2005). Foundations of Comparative Politics: Democracies of the Modern World. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. Norris, P. (2009). Comparative political communications: Common frameworks or Babelian confusion? Government and Opposition, 44(3), 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. Novak, W. J. (2008). The myth of the “weak” American state. The American Historical Review, 113(3), 752–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. Owen, R. (Ed.) (1976). Essays on the Crisis in Lebanon. London: Ithaca Press. Google Scholar
  157. Padovani, C. (2005). A Fatal Attraction: Public Television and Politics in Italy. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  158. Papatheodorou, F. & Machin, D. (2003). The umbilical cord that was never cut: The post-dictatorial intimacy between the political elite and the mass media in Greece and Spain. European Journal of Communication, 18(1), 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. Park, M.-J., & Curran, J. (Eds.) (2000). De-Westernizing Media Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  160. Patterson, T. E. & Donsbach, W. (1996). News decisions: Journalists as partisan actors. Political Communication, 13, 455–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. Patterson, T. E. (2007). Review of comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics by Daniel Hallin and Paulo Mancini. Political Communication, 24(3), 329–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Pawelka, P. (2002). Der Staat im Vorderen Orient über die Demokratie-Resistenz in einer globalisierten Welt. Leviathan, 30(4), 431–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. Pintak, L., & Ginges, J. (2009). Inside the Arab newsroom. Journalism Studies, 10(2), 157–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. Puppis, M. (2009). Media regulation in small states. The International Communication Gazette, 71(1–2), 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. Puppis, M., & d’Haenens, L. (2012). Comparing media policy and regulation. In F. Esser & T. Hanitzsch (Eds.), Handbook of Comparative Communication Research (pp. 221–233). Hoboken: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  166. Reno, W. (1998). Warlord Politics and African States. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  167. Richter, C., & Hafez, K. (2009). The image of Islam in German public service television programmes. Journal of Arab and Muslim Media Research, 2(3), 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. Rouger, A. (2009). What future for local news? The crisis of the French regional daily press. In B. Franklin (Ed.), The Future of Newspapers (pp. 193–202). Oxford, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  169. Russ-Mohl, S. (2013). The coverage of terrorism and the Iraq war in the ‘issue-attention cycle’. In J. Seethaler, G.M. Karmasin, & R. Woehlert (Eds.), The Role of the Mass Media in Hostile Conflicts from World War I to the “War on Terror” (pp. 219–236). Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar
  170. Sakr, N. (2007). Arab Television Today. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  171. Sakr, N. (2008). Gaps in the market: Insights from scholarly work on Arab media economics. In K. Hafez (Ed.), Arab Media. Power and Weakness (pp. 185–198). New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  172. Sakr, N. (March 2006). Foreign support for media freedom advocacy in the Arab Mediterranean: Globalization from above or below? Mediterranean Politics, 11(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
  173. Salibi, K. (2003). A House of Many Mansions: The History of Lebanon Reconsidered. London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  174. Schudson, M. (2002a). The news media as political institutions. Annual Review of Political Sciences, 5, 249–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. Schudson, M. (2002b). The Power of News. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  176. Schulz, W. (1997). Changes of mass media and the public sphere. Javnost – The Public Journal 4(2), 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Seaton, J. (1997). Broadcasting and the theory of public service. In. J. Curran, & J. Seaton, Power Without Responsibility: The Press and Broadcasting in Britain (5th ed., pp. 302–316). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  178. Seaton, J. (2005). Carnage and the Media: The Making and Breaking of News about Violence. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  179. Shoemaker, P.J, & Vos, T. P. (2009). Gatekeeping Theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  180. Sniderman, P., & Hagendoorn, L. (2007). When Ways of Life Collide: Multiculturalism and Its Discontents in the Netherlands. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  181. Sousa, H., & Costa e Silva, E. (2009). Keeping up appearances: Regulating media diversity in Portugal. The International Communication Gazette, 71(1–2), 89–100.Google Scholar
  182. Sreberny, A. (2000). Television, gender and democratisation in the Middle East’. In Curran and Park (Eds.), De-Westernising Media Studies (pp. 63–78). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  183. Sreberny, A. (2008). The analytic challenges of studying the Middle East and its evolving media environment. Middle East Journal of Culture and Communication, 1, 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  184. Stroud, N. (2011). Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. Thomaß, B. (2000). How journalism ethics is taught around Europe: Three examples. In B. Pattyn (Ed.), Media Ethics: Opening Social Dialogue (pp. 375–392). Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
  186. Thomaß, B. (2007). Mediensysteme im internationalen Vergleich. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  187. Thussu, D. K. (Ed.) (2009). Internationalizing Media Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  188. Traboulsi, F. (2007). A History of Modern Lebanon. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  189. Traboulsi, F. (2009). Foreword. In Z. Maasri, Off the Wall: Political Posters of the Lebanese Civil War (xvii-xxi). London: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  190. Traquina, N. (1995). Portuguese television: The politics of savage deregulation. Media, Culture & Society, 17(2), pp. 223–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  191. Turner, T. (2004, July/August). My beef with big media: How government protects big media-and shuts out upstarts like me. Washington Weekly. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2004/0407.turner.html.
  192. Voltmer, K. (2008). Comparing media systems in new democracies: East meets South meets West. Central European Journal of Communication, 1, 23–40.Google Scholar
  193. Ward, Stephen J. A. (2004). The Invention of Journalism Ethics: The Path to Objectivity and Beyond. Montreal-Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
  194. Weaver, D. (1998). Journalists around the world: Commonalities and differences. In D. Weaver (Ed.), The Global Journalist: News People Around the World (pp. 455–480). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  195. Weaver, D., & Wilnat, L. (2012). Conclusions. In D. Weaver, & L. Wilnat (Eds.), The Global Journalist in the 21st Century (pp. 1–6). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  196. Weaver, D., Beam, R., Brownlee, B., Voakes, P., & Wilhoit, C. (2006). The American Journalist in the 21st Century: US News People at the Dawn of a New Millennium. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence.Google Scholar
  197. Weber, M. (1919/1999). Politik als Beruf. In E. Flitner (Ed.), Gesammelte Politische Schriften von Max Weber (pp. 396–450). Potsdam: Institut für Pädagogik der Universität Potsdam.Google Scholar
  198. Weibull, L. (2009). Introduction to Part II: The Northern European/democratic corporatist media model countries. In G. Terzis (Ed.), European Journalism Education (pp. 69–79). Bristol, Chicago, IL: Intellect.Google Scholar
  199. Williams, R. (2005). Base and superstructure in Marxist cultural theory. In R. Williams, Culture and Materialism: Selected Essays (pp. 31–49). London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  200. Wirth, W., & Kolb, S. (2004). Designs and methods of comparative political communication research. In F. Esser & B. Pfetsch (Eds.), Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases, and Challenges (pp. 87–111). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  201. Wolfsfeld, G. (1997). Media and Political Conflict: News from the Middle East. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  202. Woods, J. (2007). Democracy and the press: A comparative analysis of pluralism in the international print media. The Social Science Journal, 44(2), 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  203. Young, M. (2010). The Ghosts of Martyrs Square: An Eyewitness Account of Lebanon’s Life Struggle. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  204. Zaret, D. (1992). Religion, science, and printing in the public spheres in seventeenth-century England. In C. Calhoun, (Ed.), Habermas and the Public Sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 109–142.Google Scholar
  205. Zelizer, B. (2000). Introduction to what journalism studies is? (Symposium Editor). Journalism, 1(1), 9–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Visiting Fellow, Centre for Lebanese Studies Academic Visitor Middle East CentreSt. Antony’s College, University of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations