Skip to main content

Artificial Intelligence and Human Security

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Inclusive Innovation for Sustainable Development
  • 1131 Accesses

Abstract

The World Economic Forum is often portrayed as a bastion of global elitism. Nevertheless, its 2014 list of the most urgent global problems reads like a Marxist critique of advanced capitalism: deepening inequalities, persistent jobless growth, lack of leadership, and weakening of democracy are among the top 10 global problems, along with environmental issues and international politics (World Economic Forum 2014). This constellation of urgent issues could certainly be characterized as constituting a ‘wicked’ problem, that is, super-complex, persistent, and resistant to resolution; partial solutions of one aspect often leading to intensification of others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvès, A.-E. (2009). «Empowerment»: Généalogie d’un concept clé du discours contemporain sur le développement. Revue Tiers Monde, 200(4), 735–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamayou, G. (2015). Drone theory. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D., & Hynek, N. (Eds.). (2010). Critical perspectives on human security: Rethinking emancipation and power in international relations (PRIO New Security Studies). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Human Security. (2003). Human security now. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzens, S., & Sutz, J. (2012). Innovation in informal settings: A research agenda. Ottawa, Canada: IDRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, T. (2014). Maintaining peace and security?: The united nations in a changing world. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2013). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation. Oxford: Oxford University Martin School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, O. A. (2012). What is a human security project? The experience of the UN trust fund for human security. Global Change, Peace & Security, 24(3), 385–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. S. (2005). Another bloody century: Future warfare. London: Orion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R., Mirta, A., Kintu, R., & Shah, N. (2013). Inclusive innovation: Definition, conceptualisation and future research priorities. Centre for Development Informatics Working Paper, University of Manchester, Manchester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiller, S., Hilhorst, D., & Weijs, B. (2014). Value chain development in fragile settings. Wageningen, The Netherlands: The IS Academy on Human Security in Fragile States.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, C. (2014). Human security and natural disasters (Routledge Humanitarian Studies Series). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, A. (2013). Human security challenges. Brighton, UK: CPRS Books/eBooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogata, S., & Cels, J. (2003). Human security—Protecting and empowering the people. Global Governance, 9(3), 273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R., Bessant, J., & Heintz, M. (2013). Responsible innovation: Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. London: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peschka, M. P. (2011). The role of the private sector in fragile and conflict-affected states. World Bank Development Report: Background Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. W. (2008). Human insecurity: Global structures of violence. London; New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandvik, K. B., Gabrielsen Jumbert, M., Karlsrud, J., & Kaufmann, M. (2014). Humanitarian technology: A critical research agenda. International Review of the Red Cross, 96, 219–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. F. (1975). Small is beautiful: Economics as if people mattered. New York: Perenial Library/Harper & Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C. (2013). Smarter than you think. London: William Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme. (1994). Human development report. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, K. (2011). Artificial intelligence: The basics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2014). Outlook on the global agenda 2015. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelenika, I., & Pearce, J. M. (2011). Barriers to appropriate technology growth in sustainable development. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(6), 12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hunter, A. (2016). Artificial Intelligence and Human Security. In: Agola, N., Hunter, A. (eds) Inclusive Innovation for Sustainable Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60168-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics