Skip to main content

Lessons to Learn from the Institutional Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In the previous part, the models of capitalism are constructed in terms of the member states of the EU on the basis of empirical analysis, and an overview of the institutional changes that occurred during the crisis in 2008 is given. Now, it is time to summarise the lessons worth learning and to draw conclusions that have relevance, on the one hand, to the comparative studies on the institutional systems and, on the other hand, to the overall European integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Drahokoupil, J., & Myant, M. (2015). Putting comparative capitalism research in its place: Varieties of capitalism in transition economies. In M. Ebenau, I. Bruff, & C. May (Eds.), New directions in critical comparative capitalisms research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • EBRD. (2013). Stuck in transition? Transition report 2013. London: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2014c): Innovation Union Scoreboard 2014. Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF (2014). 25 years of transition: Post-communist Europe and the IMF. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelle, A. (2015). Mind the gap: Arguments in favour of judicious constructivism in providing horizon for all. Intereconomics, 50(1), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelle, A., & Végh, M. (2014). Relations between the common R&D&I policy and the competitiveness divide in the European Union. Paper presented at the EACES Biennial Conference, Budapest, 4–6 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K. (Ed.) (2014). The global competitiveness report 2014–2015. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soskice, D. (2007). Macroeconomics and varieties of capitalism. In B. Hancké, M. Rhodes, & M. Thatcher (Eds.), Beyond varieties of capitalism. Conflicts, contradictions, and complementarities in the European economy (pp. 89–121). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Szerb, L., Ács, Z. J., Autio, E., Ortega-Argilés, R., & Komlósi, É. (2013). REDI: The regional entrepreneurship and development index—Measuring regional entrepreneurship. Final report, Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Farkas, B. (2016). Lessons to Learn from the Institutional Analysis. In: Models of Capitalism in the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60057-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics