Advertisement

Show and Tell: A Practice-Led Methodological Solution for Researchers in Creative Writing

  • Leanne Dodd
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Education Research Methods book series (PSERM)

Abstract

Dodd explores the challenge facing students transitioning from the role of creative practitioner to practice-led researcher of creative practice. This chapter sets out to resolve the dichotomy between the creative writing style, based on the premise of ‘Show, don’t tell’, and the conflicting academic writing style, where the main purpose is to ‘tell’. Through a case study of strategic risk taking in the journey as creative practitioner/researcher, Dodd maneuvers between the two methods to cultivate creative engagement between the two components of the thesis. The aim of this approach is to offer a methodology which will produce synergized research outcomes for practice-led researchers that satisfy the accepted conventions of scholarship and the creative practitioner’s desire to produce enhanced work not mitigated by the exegetical component.

Keywords

Reflective Practice Creative Work Academic Writing Reflective Writing Creative Writing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arnold, J. (2005). The PhD in writing accompanied by an exegesis. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 2(1), 36–50.Google Scholar
  2. Brien, D. L. (2006). Creative practice as research: A creative writing case study. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture & Policy, (118), 53.Google Scholar
  3. Bourke, N. A., & Neilsen, P. M. (2004). The problem of the exegesis in creative writing higher degrees. TEXT: The Journal of the Australasian Association of Writing Programs, Special Issue, 3.Google Scholar
  4. Candy, L. (2006). Practice based research: A guide, vol CCS Report: 2006 V1.0 November, pp. 1–19. Creativity and Cognition Studies. Sydney, NSW: University of Technology.Google Scholar
  5. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Central Queensland University. (2010). Program rules for the degree of doctor of philosophy. Version 10. Author.Google Scholar
  7. Davis, R., & Shadle, M. (2000, February). “Building a mystery”: Alternative research writing and the academic act of seeking. College Composition and Communication, 51(3), 417–446.Google Scholar
  8. Fletcher, J., & Mann, A. (2004). Illuminating the exegesis, an introduction. TEXT: The Journal of the Australian Association of Writing Programs, Special Issue 3.Google Scholar
  9. Frost, R. (1920). Mountain interval. New York: Henry Holt and Company.Google Scholar
  10. Kroll, J. (2002, April). Creative writing as research and the dilemma of accreditation: How do we prove the value of what we do? TEXT: The Journal of the Australian Association of Writing Programs, 6(1). Retrieved from http://www.textjournal.com.au/april02/kroll.htm
  11. Milech, B. H., & Schilo, A. (2004). “Exit Jesus”: Relating the exegesis and creative/production components of a research thesis. TEXT: The Journal of the Australian Association of Writing Programs, Special Issue 3.Google Scholar
  12. Monash University Library. (2007). QuickRef27: How to write the case study. Author. Retrieved from http://www.monash.edu.au/lls/llonline/quickrefs/27-case-study.pdf
  13. Nash, G. (2011, April). The creative writing kaleidoscope. TEXT: The Journal of the Australian Association of Writing Programs, 15(1). Retrieved from http://www.textjournal.com.au/april11/nash.htm
  14. Pankin, S. (1987). Virginia Woolf and the lust of creation: A psychoanalytic exploration. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  15. Pringle, H. (2014) The thief of time. New Scientist: The Collection, Issue 3.Google Scholar
  16. Scrivener, S. (2000). Reflection in and on action and practice in creative-production doctoral projects in art and design. Working Papers in Art and Design, vol. 1. Retrieved from https://www.herts.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/12281/WPIAAD_vol1_scrivener.pdf
  17. Stewart, R. (2001, October). Practice vs praxis: Constructing models for practitioner-based research. TEXT: The Journal of the Australian Association of Writing Programs, 5(2). Retrieved from http://www.textjournal.com.au/oct01/stewart.htm
  18. Strand, D. (1998). Research in the creative arts. Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra, ACT.Google Scholar
  19. Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Vella, R. (2005). Keeping the degree creative. Real Time Arts, Issue No. 68 Aug–Sept.Google Scholar
  21. Woolf, V. (2015). The waves. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Yin, Robert K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leanne Dodd
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Education and the ArtsCQUniversity AustraliaBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations