Advertisement

Methodological and Other Research Strategies to Manoeuvre from Single to Multi- and Interdisciplinary Project Partnerships

  • Donna Lee Brien
  • Margaret McAllister
Chapter
  • 3.3k Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Education Research Methods book series (PSERM)

Abstract

This chapter explores what happens when researchers from distinctly different knowledge fields with diverse research methodologies and approaches (in this case, creative arts and nursing) work on multi- and interdisciplinary projects. Definitions of single discipline, and multi- and interdisciplinary research are provided, and exemplified by drawing upon the authors’ own recent research experiences. Working together opened up a maze of methodological choices and decisions in the research process, including approaches to data collection, interpretation, and dissemination. Two joint projects are described in order to explore the challenges, and opportunities, in working in, and manoeuvring through, this challenging but rewarding terrain.

Keywords

Eating Disorder Collaborative Practice Mental Health Practitioner Interdisciplinary Project Creative Writing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adame, A., & Hornstein, G. (2006). Representing madness: How are subjective experiences of emotional distress presented in first person accounts? The Humanistic Psychologist, 34(2), 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Research Council. (2014). ERA 2015. Excellence in research for Australia. 2015 Submission Guidelines. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  3. Brady, T. (2000). A question of genre: De-mystifying the exegesis. TEXT: Journal of Writing and Writing Courses, 4(1). Retrieved from http://www.textjournal.com.au
  4. Brien, D. L. (2011). Pathways into an “elaborate ecosystem”: Ways of categorising the food memoir. TEXT: Journal of Writers and Writing Courses, 15(2). Retrieved from http://www.textjournal.com.au.
  5. Brien, D. L. (2013). Starving, bingeing and writing: Memoirs of eating disorder as food writing. TEXT: Journal of Writers and Writing Courses, Special Issue no 18: Nonfiction now. Retrieved from http://www.textt.com.au/.
  6. Brien, D. L. (2014). In the best of taste: Contemporary food writing as literature. TEXT: Journal of Writers and Writing Courses. Special issue no 26: Taste and, and in, writing and publishing. Retrieved from http://www.textjournal.com.au
  7. Brien, D. L., & Brady, T. (2003). Collaborative practice: Categorising forms of collaboration for practitioners. TEXT: The Journal of the Australian Association of Writing Programs, 7(2), Retrieved from http://www.textt.com.au/.
  8. Brien, D. L., Freiman, M., Kroll, J., & Webb, J. (2011). The Australasian Association of Writing Programs 1996–2011. New Writing, 8(3), 238–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brien, D. L., & McAllister, M. (2013). Off the shelf and into practice: Creatively repackaging popular memoirs as educational resources in health disciplines. TEXT: Journal of Writers and Writing Courses, Special Issue no 23. Retrieved from http://www.text.com.au/.
  10. Brien, D. L., & McAllister, M. (2015). Revisioning research in social and cultural practice: Multidisciplinary/interdisciplinary research methodologies. Paper presented at the Revisioning Space(s), Time and Bodies Conference Proceedings. Sydney, April 2015.Google Scholar
  11. Brooks, V., & Thistlethwaite, J. (2012). Working and learning across professional boundaries. British Journal of Educational Studies, 60(4), 403–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bulik, C. (2011). The woman in the mirror: How to stop confusing what you look like with who you are. New York: Walker and Company.Google Scholar
  13. Cameron, A. (2011). Impermeable boundaries?: Developments in professional and interprofessional practice. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 25, 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. CQUniversity. (2013). Using narrative pedagogy to facilitate learner engagement in the recovery approach in mental health. Scholarship of Learning and Teaching Grant.Google Scholar
  15. CQUniversity. (2015). Vice-chancellor’s award for good practice in learning and teaching. Retrieved from http://www.cqu.edu.au/
  16. Cheng, A., Hawton, K., Lee, C., & Chen, T. (2007). The influence of media reporting of the suicide of a celebrity on suicide rates: A population-based study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36(6), 1229–1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Corrigan, P. W., Larson, J. E., Watson, A. C., Boyle, M., & Barr, L. (2006). Solutions to discrimination in work and housing identified by people with mental illness. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 194(10), 716–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Creswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  20. D’Amour, D., Farrada-Videla, M., San Martin Rodriguez, L., & Beauliey, M. (2005). The conceptual basis for inter-professional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworks. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 19(1), 116–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Drew, N., Funk, M., Tang, S., Lamichhane, J., & Chavez, E. (2011). Human rights violations of people with mental and psychosocial disabilities: An unresolved global crisis. The Lancet, 36(11), 1664–1675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. (EURAB) European Union Research Advisory Board. (2004). Interdisciplinarity in research. Retrieved from http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/eurab/pdf/eurab_04_009_interdisciplinarity_research_final.pdf/
  23. Fukui, S., Davidson, L., Holter, M., & Rapp, C. (2010). Pathways to recovery (PTR): Impact of peer-led group participation on mental health recovery outcomes. Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 34(1), 42–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Giroux, H. (2014). Public intellectualism today. Arena Magazine, 128, 42–45.Google Scholar
  25. Grenville, K. (1990). The writing book. St Leonards: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  26. Halpern, J. (2001). From detached concern to empathy: Humanising medical practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hiatt, B. (2014, September 24). Show house riles mental health lobby. The West Australian. Retrieved from https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/25091931/show-house-riles-mental-health-lobby/
  28. Jirojwong, S., Johnson, M., & Welch, A. (2011). Research methods in nursing and midwifery: Pathways to evidence based practice. Sydney: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kincheloe, J. (2001). The bricolage: Conceptualizing a new rigor in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 7(6), 679–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klein, J. (2010). A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In R. Frodeman, J. T. Klein, & C. Mitcham (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Interdisciplinarity (pp. 15–30). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kroll, J., & Harper, G. (2013). Research methods in creative writing. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Lau, L., & Pasquini, M. (2008). “Jack of all trades?”: The negotiation of interdisciplinarity within geography. Geoforum, 39(2), 552–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leder, H., Gerger, G., Brieber, D., & Schwart, N. (2014). What makes an art expert?: Emotion and evaluation in art appreciation. Cognition and Emotion, 28(6), 1137–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Long, R. (2010). Using bibliotherapy as a tool for counselling students. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching, 3(1), 77–83.Google Scholar
  35. Madsen, W. (2007). Nursing history: Foundations of a profession. Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education Australia.Google Scholar
  36. Matheson, L., & Bobay, K. (2007). Validation of oppressed group behaviors in nursing. Journal of Professional Nursing, 23(4), 226–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McAllister, M., & Brien, D. L. (2014a). Shaping the future: Interdisciplinary, innovative approaches to enhance therapeutic engagement with the person experiencing disordered eating. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Conference of the ACMHN, Melbourne, October 2014.Google Scholar
  38. McAllister, M., & Brien, D. L. (2014b). Investigating the educative potential of eating disorder memoirs. Paper presented at the Eating Disorders and Obesity Conference, Gold Coast, May 26–27, 2014.Google Scholar
  39. McAllister, M., & Brien, D. L. (2015a). Haunted: Exploring representations of mental health through the lens of the gothic. Aeternum: The Journal of Contemporary Gothic Studies, 2(1), 72–90.Google Scholar
  40. McAllister, M., & Brien, D. L. (2015b). Haunted: Teaching mental health nurses about the Gothic to help promote understandings of mental health and ill-health. Paper presented at the Gothic Association of New Zealand and Australia. Sydney, January 21–23, 2014.Google Scholar
  41. McAllister, M., Brien, D. L., Flynn, T., & Alexander, J. (2014). Things you can learn from books: Exploring the therapeutic potential of eating disorder memoirs. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 23, 553–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McAllister, M., Madsen, W., & Holmes, C. (2013). Newton’s cradle: A metaphor to consider the flexibility, resistance and direction of nursing’s future. Nursing Inquiry, 21(2), 130–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McAllister, M., Madsen, W., Holmes, C., & Morrissey, S. (2012). 2020 vision: The view from Queensland stakeholders on the changes affecting nursing. Maroochydore: University of the Sunshine Coast.Google Scholar
  44. McAllister, M., Oprescu, F., & Jones, C. (2014). N2E: Envisioning a process to support transition from nurse to educator. Contemporary Nurse, 4(2), 246–252.Google Scholar
  45. McGrath, P., & Morrow, B. (1993). Introduction. In P. McGrath & B. Morrow (Eds.), The Picador book of the new gothic (pp. xi–xiv). London and New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  46. Oremland, J. D. (2014). Empathy and its relation to the appreciation of art. In J. D. Lichtenberg, M. Bornstein, & D. Silver, Empathy I (pp. 239–265), Hove: Routledge. (1st pub. 1984).Google Scholar
  47. Pelan, R. (2013). Practising disobedience: Feminist politics in the academy. Hecate, 38(1/2), 210–222.Google Scholar
  48. Piatti-Farnell, L., & Brien, D. L. (Eds.) (2015). The gothic compass: New directions in scholarship and inquiry. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Power, A. (2010). Transforming the nation’s health: Next steps in mental health promotion. American Journal of Public Health, 100(12), 2343–2346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Powers, B., & Knapp, T. (2010). Dictionary of nursing theory and research (4th ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  51. Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist’s view of psychotherapy. London: Constable.Google Scholar
  52. Smith, D. (1989). The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Stanghellini, G., & Rosfort, R. (2013). Empathy as a sense of autonomy. Psychopathology, 46(5), 337–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sturm, U., Beckton, D., & Brien, D. L. (2015). Curation on campus: An exhibition curatorial experiment for creative industries students. MC Journal, 18(4), Retrieved from http://www.journal.media-culture.org.au/
  55. Thornicroft, G. (2006). Shunned: Discrimination against people with mental illness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Wasson, S. (2015). Useful darkness: Intersections between medical humanities and gothic studies. Gothic Studies, 17(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Watters, J. K., & Biernacki, P. (1989). Targeted sampling: Options for the study of hidden populations. Social Problems, 36(4), 416–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Webb, J., & Brien, D. L. (2012). Addressing the “ancient quarrel”: Creative writing as research. In M. Biggs & H. Karlsson (Eds.), The Routledge companion to research in the arts (pp. 186–204). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Weech, Terry L. (2007). Multidisciplinarity in education for digital librarianship. In Proceedings of the 2007 Informing Science and IT Education Joint Conference, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL: Graduate School of Library and Information Science. Retrieved from http://www.proceedings.informingscience.org/InSITE2007/InSITE07p011-021Weec285.pdf/
  60. World Health Organisation. (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Geneva: World Health Organisation Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donna Lee Brien
    • 1
  • Margaret McAllister
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Education and the ArtsCQUniversity AustraliaNoosavilleAustralia
  2. 2.School of Nursing and MidwiferyCQUniversity AustraliaNoosavilleAustralia

Personalised recommendations