Advertisement

On Manoeuvre: Navigating Practice-Led Methodology in a Creative Writing PhD for the First Time

  • Mike Danaher
  • Margaret Jamieson
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Education Research Methods book series (PSERM)

Abstract

Supervisors and their PhD students in the social practices often deal with unfamiliar epistemologies and methodologies. To progress they have to broaden their understanding of ‘new’ methodologies. This chapter explores how both a supervisor and student (the authors of this chapter) have approached a PhD involving a historical romance novel and accompanying exegesis. The student is employing a practice-led research methodology. Using the grand tour question (Leech, Political Science and Politics, 35, 665–668, 2002) of how researchers maneuver through the maze of methodology to make meaning for their research project, the chapter divides going on maneuver into five stages concerning this practice-led methodology (visioning, planning, journeying, reflecting, and evaluating). The insights on how they charted this new territory from their novice standpoints can assist other students and supervisors when going on their own unfamiliar methodological maneuvers.

Keywords

Research Methodology Creative Process Student Relationship Reflective Journal Creative Writing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arnold, J. (2005). The PhD in writing accompanied by an exegesis. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 2(1). Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol2/iss1/5
  2. Arnold, J. (2007). Practice led research: A dynamic way to knowledge. Camberwell, VIC: Rockview Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, J. (2008). Supervising PhD candidates in Practice Led Research degrees, Proceedings of the Paris International Conference on Education, Economy and Society, Paris, France, 17–19 July 2008.Google Scholar
  4. Bacon, E. (2014). Journaling—A path to exegesis in creative research, TEXT, 18 (2). Retrieved from http://www.textjournal.com.au/oct14/bacon.htm
  5. Barrett, E. (2004). What does it meme? The exegesis as valorisation and validation of creative arts, Text Special Issue No 3.Google Scholar
  6. Brien, D. L. (2004). The problem of where to start: A foundation question for creative writing higher degree candidates and supervisors. In J. Fletcher & A. Mann (Eds.), TEXT Special Issue Website Series:Illuminating the Exegesis’ (April).Google Scholar
  7. Brien, D. L., & Williamson, R. (2009). Supervising the creative arts research higher degree: Towards best practice. In D. L. Brien & R. Williamson (Eds.), Introduction to TEXT Special Issue Website Series No 6: Supervising the Creative Arts Research Higher Degree (October).Google Scholar
  8. Bundy, P. (2006). Reflective practice and the playwright/scholar. NJ Drama Australia Journal, 30, 51–60.Google Scholar
  9. Burnett, P. (2015). Australian research training landscape: Quality assurance. Paper presented to Research Higher Degree Supervisor Training Event, CQUniversity.Google Scholar
  10. Burr, S., & Hanley, P. (2008). TEXT review Josie Arnold, practice led research, TEXT, 12 (2). Retrieved from http://www.textjournal.com.au/oct08/burr_hanley_rev.htm
  11. Candy, L. (2006). Practice based research: A guide, Creativity & Cognition Studios. Sydney: University of Technology.Google Scholar
  12. de la Harpe, B., & Radloff, A. (2003). From practice to theory in developing generic skills. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving student learning: Theory and practice - 10 years on. Oxford: OCTD, Oxford Brookes University.Google Scholar
  13. Dibble, B., & van Loon, J. (2004). The higher degree research journey as a three-legged race. TEXT, 8(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
  14. Frayling, C., Stead, V., Archer, B., Cook, N., Powell, J., Scrivener, S., et al. (1997). Practice-based doctorates in the creative and performing arts and design. UK Council for Graduate Education. Staffordshire: Lichfield.Google Scholar
  15. Giroux, H. A. (2005). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Green, L. R. (2006). Creative writing as practice-led research. Australian Journal of Communication, 33(2,3), 175–188.Google Scholar
  17. Green, L.R. (2007). Recognising practice-led research … at last! Paper presented at the Hatched 2007 Arts Research Symposium, Perth.Google Scholar
  18. Hamilton, J. G., & Jaaniste, L. O. (2009). Content, structure and orientations of the practice-led exegesis. Art Media Design: Writing Intersections, Swinburne University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  19. Hecq, D. (2008). Writing the unconscious: Psychoanalysis for the creative writer. TEXT, 12(2).Google Scholar
  20. Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., Lovat, T., & Fairbairn, H. (2008). Consistency and inconsistency in PhD thesis examination. Australian Journal of Education, 52, 36–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kroll, J. (2009). The supervisor as practice-led coach and trainer: Getting creative writing doctoral candidates across the finish line. In D. L. Brien & R. Williamson (Eds.), TEXT Special Issue Website Series No 6: Supervising the Creative Arts Research Higher Degree (October).Google Scholar
  22. Kroll, J., & Finlayson, K. (2012). Transforming creative writing postgraduate and Supervisor identities: Ways of becoming professional. TEXT, 16(2).Google Scholar
  23. Leech, B. (2002). Asking questions: A technique for semi-structured interviews. Political Science and Politics, 35, 665–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mäkelä, M., Nimkulrat, N., Dash, D. P., & Nsenga, F.-X. (2011). On reflecting and making in artistic research. Journal of Research Practice, 7(1). Retrieved from http://ezproxy.cqu.edu.au/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=79542643&site=eds-live&scope=site
  25. McNamara, A. (2012). Six rules for practice-led research, TEXT, Issue 14, Queensland University of Technology. http://www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/issue14/McNamara.pdf
  26. Midgley, W., Tyler, M. A., Danaher, P. A., & Mander, A. (Eds.), (2011). Beyond binaries in education research (Routledge research in education vol. 59). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Milech B., & Schilo A. (2004). ‘Exit Jesus’: Relating the Exegesis and Creative/Production Components of a Research Thesis. TEXT Special Issue No 3. Retrieved from http://www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/issue3/milechschilo.htm
  28. Nimkulrat, N. (2007). The role of documentation in practice-led research. Journal of Research Practice, 3(1). Retrieved from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/58/83
  29. Regis, P. (2003). A natural history of the romance novel. Penn Press: University of Pennsylvania.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Scrivener, S. (2002). Characterising creative-production doctoral projects in art and design. International Journal of Design Sciences and Technology, 10(2), 25–44.Google Scholar
  31. Smith, H., & Dean, R. T. (Eds.) (2009). Practice-led research, research-led practice in the creative arts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  32. van Manen, M. (2002). Writing in the dark: Phenomenological studies in interpretive Inquiry. London: Althouse Press.Google Scholar
  33. Vella, R. (2005). Keeping the degree creative. Real time: Australia’s critical guide to International contemporary arts, 68: 2. Retrieved from; http://www.realtimearts.net/article/issue68/7916 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mike Danaher
    • 1
  • Margaret Jamieson
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Education and the ArtsCQUniversity AustraliaRockhamptonAustralia
  2. 2.School of Education and the ArtsCQUniversity AustraliaSpring GullyAustralia

Personalised recommendations