Skip to main content

Abstract

When researching education and social practices, methodological considerations are no longer—if indeed they ever were—linear, seamless, or even consistently coherent. Increasingly, the markers of difference among research methodologies in the social sciences are challenged, ambushed even, as fit-for-purpose methodological relationships are constructed. This edited collection echoes such developmental trajectories from the oppositional stances of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods to the emerging nimble, fluid, recursive, and iterative paradigms evocative of the messiness characterising the web of independent problems that emerge as research progresses (Ackoff, 1979; Law, 2004; Hester & Adams, 2014).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1979). The future of operational research is past. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 30(3), 189–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anfara, V. A., & Mertz, N. T. (Eds.) (2015). Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bexley, E., James, R., & Arkoudis, S. (2011, September). The Australian academic profession in transition: Addressing the challenge of reconceptualising academic work and regenerating the academic workforce. Commissioned report prepared for the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. University of Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education. Retrieved 11 November 2011 from http://www.cshe.unimelb.edu.au

  • Chinn, C. A., Buckland, L. A., & Samarapungavan, A. L. A. (2011). Expanding the dimensions of epistemic cognition: Arguments from philosophy and psychology. Educational Psychologist, 46(3), 141–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danaher, P. A., Davies, A., De George-Walker, L., Jones, J. K., Matthews, K. J., Midgley, W., et al. (Eds.) (2014). Contemporary capacity-building in educational contexts. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan/Palgrave Pivot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denholm, C., & Evans, T. D. (Eds.) (2009). Beyond doctorates downunder: Maximising the impact of your doctorate from Australia and New Zealand. Camberwell, VIC: ACER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.) (2013). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (2010). The future of the research workforce: Estimating demand for PhDs in Australia. Journal of Higher Education Policy Management, 32(2), 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fetterman, D. M. (2010). Ethnography step-by-step (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2011). Introducing research methodology: A beginner’s guide to doing a research project. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harreveld, R. E. (2004). Ethical and political dimensions of strategic risk-taking in research. In P. N. Coombes, M. J. M. Danaher, & P. A. Danaher (Eds.), Strategic uncertainties: Ethics, politics and risk in contemporary educational research (pp. 39–51). Flaxton, QLD: Post Pressed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hester, P. T., & Adams, K. (2014). Systemic thinking: Fundamentals for understanding problems and messes. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R. (2014). Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A., Goodyear, P. Seddon, T. & Renshaw, P. (2011). Position paper submitted to AARE and ACDE executives. September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leech, B. (2002). Asking questions: A technique for semi-structured interviews. Political Science and Politics, 35, 665–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research. Sage: Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, W., Tyler, M. A., Danaher, P. A., & Mander, A. (Eds.) (2011). Beyond binaries in education research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preissle, J. (2011). Qualitative futures: Where we might go from where we’ve been. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 685–698). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullinger, K. (2008, 20 September). How to write fiction: Research. The Guardian. Retrieved from: http://www.theguardian.com/books/2008/sep/20/katepullinger.writing.fiction2

  • Punch, K. (2014). Introduction to social research: Quantitative & qualitative approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, L. (2005). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M. (2012). Contextualising theories and practices of bricolage research. The Qualitative Report, 17(7), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon T., Bennett, D., Bennett, S., Bobis, J., Chan, P., Harrison, N. & Shore, S. (2013). Education research Australia: A changing ecology of knowledge and practice. Published online 12 July 2013, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sursock, A., & Smidt, H. (2010). Trends 2010: A decade of change in European higher education. Brussels: European University Association. Retrieved 7 November 2011 from http://www.eua.be

  • Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J., & Brien, D. (2011). Addressing the “ancient quarrel”: creative writing as research. In M. Biggs & H. Karlsson (Eds.), The Routledge companion to research in the arts. pp. 186-203. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wray, A., & Wallace, M. (2011). Accelerating the development of expertise: A step-change in social science research capacity building. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(3), 241–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaborskis, M. (2011, August 4). How becoming of you [Web log post]. Flexner Book Club Blog. Retrieved September 9, 2011, from http://flexner.blogs.brynmawr.edu/

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harreveld, B., Danaher, M., Lawson, C., Knight, B.A., Busch, G. (2016). Introduction. In: Harreveld, B., Danaher, M., Lawson, C., Knight, B., Busch, G. (eds) Constructing Methodology for Qualitative Research. Palgrave Studies in Education Research Methods. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59943-8_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59943-8_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59942-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59943-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics