Skip to main content

Abstract

There has been a slow but steady increase in the number of mixed methods research studies in the social sciences over the last decade (see Creswell, A concise introduction to mixed methods research, SAGE, 2015) as well as in the applied linguistics literature in general. A major advantage of mixed methods research is the ability to gain a rich, complete picture of the phenomenon under investigation, usually through the triangulation of data obtained through different qualitative sources with descriptive and quantitative data. The careful combination of both approaches can allow the research to examine a problem from a range of complementary angles. In this chapter we demonstrate how different approaches can be used together in applied linguistics research and provide practical advice on how to conduct a mixed methods study along with some suggestions for design and data analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbuhl, R., & Mackey, A. (2015). Second language acquisition research methods. In K. King & Y. Lai (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 10. Research methods in language and education (3rd ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cekaite, A. (2007). A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom. Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2015). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., & Garrett, A. L. (2008). Methodological issues in conducting mixed methods research designs. In M. M. Bergman (Ed.), Advances in mixed methods research (pp. 66–83). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demmen, J., Semino, E., Demjen, Z., Koller, V., Hardie, A., Rayson, P., & Payne, S. (2015). A computer-assisted study of the use of violence metaphors for cancer and end of life by patients, family carers and health professionals. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(2), 205–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2016). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi, M., & Babaii, E. (2013). Mixed methods research: Toward new research designs in applied linguistics. Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 828–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jick, T. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. In J. Van Maanen (Ed.), Qualitative methodology (pp. 135–148). Beverly Hills: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 60–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, K. A., & Mackey, A. (2016). Research methodology in second language studies: Trends, concerns, and new directions. Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. (2016). Reducing international graduate students’ language anxiety through oral pronunciation corrections. System, 56(1), 78–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2012). Instructed second language acquisition. In A. Mackey & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide (1st ed., pp. 55–73). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(3), 405–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A. (2015). Methodological practice and progression in second language research. AILA Review, 27, 80–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2015). Second language research: Methodology and design (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeller, A. J., Creswell, J. W., & Saville, N. (Eds.). (2015). Language assessment and mixed methods. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mroz, A. (2015). The development of second language critical thinking in a virtual language learning environment: A process-oriented mixed-method study. CALICO Journal, 32(3), 528–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Préfontaine, Y., & Kormos, J. (2015). The relationship between task difficulty and second language fluency in French: A mixed methods approach. Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 96–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, R. M. O., & Nasr, A. (2004). Improving reading performance among Egyptian engineering students: Principles and practice. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riazi, A. M. (2016). Innovative Mixed-methods Research: Moving Beyond Design Technicalities to Epistemological and Methodological Realizations. Applied Linguistics, 37(1), 33–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riazi, A. M., & Candlin, C. N. (2014). Mixed-methods research in language teaching and learning: Opportunities, issues and challenges. Language Teaching, 47(2), 135–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, L. (1999). Using NVivo in qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. (2012). Eye tracking as a measure of noticing: A study of explicit recasts in SCMC. Language Learning & Technology, 16(3), 53–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Editorial: The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trochim, W. M. (2006). The research methods knowledge base (2nd ed.). Retrieved from http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison Mackey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mackey, A., Bryfonski, L. (2018). Mixed Methodology. In: Phakiti, A., De Costa, P., Plonsky, L., Starfield, S. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Applied Linguistics Research Methodology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59900-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59899-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59900-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics