Advertisement

A Digital Movement of Opinion? Contesting Austerity Through Social Media

  • Mauro Barisione
  • Andrea Ceron
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology book series (PSEPS)

Abstract

Social media opinions, although expressed by generally more active citizenry, are emerging as an increasingly legitimate and influential form of public opinion. As social media allow to overcome the problem of hidden preferences and can favour political mobilisation, these online opinions can also be linked with collective action. Accordingly, the present chapter examines the role of such digital voices as potential manifestations of ‘digital movements of opinion’. First, we employ a semi-automated content analysis technique to detect Eurosceptic attitudes on austerity in three European countries (France, Britain, and Italy). Second, we test the relationship between online scepticism and the propensity to broadcast online forms of anti-EU protests, rallies, and demonstrations. Our analysis highlights that anti-austerity protest seems to boost the online debate on austerity.

Keywords

Social media Semi-automated content analysis Public opinion Eurosceptisism Collective action 

References

  1. Allum, P.A. (1995). State and Society in Western Europe. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, W.L. and Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), pp. 739–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumer, H. (1948). Public opinion and public opinion polling. American Sociological Review, 13, pp. 542–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1973). L’opinion publique n’existe pas. Les Temps Modernes, 318, pp. 1292–1309.Google Scholar
  5. Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), pp. 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ceron, A., Curini, L., Iacus, S.M. and Porro, G. (2014). Every tweet counts? How sentiment analysis of social media can improve our knowledge of citizens’ political preferences with an application to Italy and France. New Media & Society, 16(2), pp. 340–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ceron, A., Curini, L. and Iacus, S.M. (2015). Using sentiment analysis to monitor electoral campaigns method matters – Evidence from the United States and Italy. Social Science Computer Review, 33(1), pp. 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ceron, A., Curini, L. and Iacus, S.M. (2016). ISA: A fast, scalable and accurate algorithm for sentiment analysis of social media content. Information Sciences, 367–368, pp. 105–124.Google Scholar
  11. Ceron, A. and Negri, F. (2016). The “social side” of public policies: Monitoring online public opinion and its mobilization during the policy cycle. Policy & Internet, 8(2), pp. 131–147.Google Scholar
  12. Chadwick, A (2013). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooley, C.H. (1918). Public opinion as process. In: C.H. Cooley (ed.), Social Process, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, pp. 378–395.Google Scholar
  14. De Wilde, P., Michailidou, A. and Trenz, H.J. (2013). Contesting Europe: Exploring Euroscepticism in Online Media Coverage. Essex: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dekker, R. and Bekkers, V. (2015). The contingency of governments’ responsiveness to the virtual public sphere: A systematic literature review and meta-synthesis. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), pp. 496–505. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.09.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Della Porta, D. and Mattoni, A. (2014). Spreading Protest: Social movements in Times of Crisis. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  17. Della Porta, D. and Mosca, L. (2005). Global-net for global movements? A network of networks for a movement of movements. Journal of Public Policy, 25(01), pp. 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Earl, J. and Kimport, K. (2011). Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet Age. Boston: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eriksen, E.O. (2005). An emerging European public sphere. European Journal of Social Theory, 8(3), pp. 341–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farrell, H. (2012). The consequences of the internet for politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 15, pp. 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gelman, A. and King, G. (1993). Why are American presidential election campaign polls so variable when votes are so predictable?. British Journal of Political Science, 23(4), pp. 409–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ginsberg, B. (1986). The Captive Public. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  23. Habermas, J. (1962). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Neuwied: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  24. Hick, S. and McNutt, J. (eds.) (2002). Advocacy, Activism and the Internet. Chicago: Lyceum Books.Google Scholar
  25. Key, V.O. (1961). Public Opinion and American democracy. 1st edition, New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  26. Koopmans, R. (2007). Who inhabits the European public sphere? Winners and losers, supporters and opponents in Europeanised political debates. European Journal of Political Research, 46(2), pp. 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koopmans, R. and Statham, P. (eds.) (2010). The Making of a European Public Sphere: Media Discourse and Political Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kreiss, D. (2015). Digital campaigning. In: S. Coleman and D. Freelon, (eds.), Handbook of Digital Politics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 118–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kriesi, H. (2012). The political consequences of the financial and economic crisis in Europe: Electoral punishment and popular protest. Swiss Political Science Review, 18(4), pp. 518–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. and Frey, T. (2008). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lazarsfeld, P.F., Berelson, B. and Gaudet, H. (1944). The People’s Choice: How the Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Election, New York: Duell, Sloan and PearceGoogle Scholar
  32. Maireder, A., Schlögl, S., Schütz, F., Karwautz, M. and Waldheim, C. (2014). The European Political Twittersphere. Universität Wien & GfK.Google Scholar
  33. Morozov, E. (2011). The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. New York: Public Affairs Books.Google Scholar
  34. Morstatter, F., Pfeffer, J., Liu, H. and Carley, K.M. (2013). Is the sample good enough? Comparing data from Twitter’s streaming API with Twitter’s firehose. In: Proceedings the Seventh International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, 400–408, 8–11 July, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  35. Norris, P. and Reif, K. (1997). Second-order elections. European Journal of Political Research, 31(1), pp. 109–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Park, R.E. (1904). The Crowd and the Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Perrin, A.J. and McFarland, K. (2011). Social theory and public opinion. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, pp. 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Price, V. (1992). Public opinion. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reif, K. and Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second-order national elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European election results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), pp. 3–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sampson, J., Morstatter, F., Maciejewski, R. and Liu, H. (2015). Surpassing the limit: keyword clustering to improve Twitter sample coverage. ACM, HyperText conference, 237–245, 1–4 September, Guzelyurt, TRNC, Cyprus.Google Scholar
  41. Schäfer, A. and Streeck, W. (eds.) (2013). Politics in the Age of Austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  42. Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in Movement: Social Movements, Collective Action and Mass Politics in the Modern State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Tilly, C. and Wood, L.J. (2015). Social Movements 1768–2012. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Trenz, H.J. (2004). Media coverage on European governance exploring the European public sphere in national quality newspapers. European Journal of Communication, 19(3), pp. 291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Triandafyllidou, A., Wodak, R. and Krzyżanowski, M. (2009). The European Public Sphere and the Media. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vaccari, C. (2013). Digital Politics in Western Democracies: A Comparative Study. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Wright, S. (2015). E-petitions. In: S. Coleman and D. Freelon, (eds.), Handbook of Digital Politics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 136–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zaller, J. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of social and political sciencesUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanoItaly
  2. 2.Department of social and political sciences, Università degli Studi di MilanoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations