Abstract
The process through which mega-event planning and bid logics evolve and are justified has much to tell us about how urban space is produced in the modern city. This concluding chapter emphasizes the need to shift the emphasis of political debate away from the bid itself, to focus instead on the long-term policy making strategies that motivate bidding behind the scenes. By extending the horizons of bid failure, there is the opportunity to gain critical insight into the formation of urban policy, planning, and practice. This chapter reiterates several important lessons learned for cities considering whether or not to bid for the Games, and illustrates that cities have become adept at leveraging the mega-event bidding process for particular purposes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Oliver, R. (2011). Toronto’s Olympic aspirations: A bid for the waterfront. Urban Geography, 32(6), 767–787.
Raco, M. (2012). The privatisation of urban development and the London Olympics 2012. City, 16(4), 452–460.
Swyngedouw, E., Moulaert, F., & Rodriguez, A. (2002). Neoliberal urbanization in Europe: Large–scale urban development projects and the new urban policy. Antipode, 34(3), 542–577.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oliver, R., Lauermann, J. (2017). Conclusion: Rethinking the Horizons of Failed Bids. In: Failed Olympic Bids and the Transformation of Urban Space. Mega Event Planning. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59823-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59823-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59822-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59823-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)