Skip to main content

Policy Mobilities and the Bid

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Failed Olympic Bids and the Transformation of Urban Space

Part of the book series: Mega Event Planning ((MEGAEP))

  • 425 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines how political strategies and policy knowledge travel across cities bidding for the Olympics. It introduces urban studies scholarship on “policy mobilities”—interurban flows of expertise, knowledge, and models. This chapter focuses on the role of the bid consulting industry in facilitating policy mobilities, seen particularly in the mobility of expertise surrounding urban technology, sustainability, and urban architecture and design. This chapter argues that policy mobilities are driven by import imperatives (e.g., the need for cities to hire international experts when designing their bids) and by export imperatives (e.g., the desire to legitimate local projects by linking them to globally replicable policy models or templates).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acuto, M. (2013). City leadership in global governance. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 19(3), 481–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, J., & Cochrane, A. (2014). The urban unbound: London’s politics and the 2012 Olympic Games. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5), 1609–1624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barcelona Olympic Office. (1986). Projet de planification des besoins en informatique et télécommunications pour les Jeux Olympiques de 1992 / BIT ‘92. (Archival document). Lausanne: Olympic Studies Centre archives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barcelona Olympic Office. (1993). Official Report of the XXV Olympiad Barcelona 1992 (Vol. 3) (Archival document). Los Angeles, CA: LA84 Olympic Legacy Foundation archives.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beal, V., & Pinson, G. (2014). When mayors go global: International strategies, urban governance and leadership. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(1), 302–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boykoff, J. (2014). Celebration capitalism and the Olympic games. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, P., & Haggerty, K. D. (2009). Spectacular security: Mega-events and the security complex. International Political Sociology, 3(3), 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cashman, R. I., & Harris, R. (2012). The Australian olympic caravan from 2000 to 2012: A unique olympic events industry. Sydney: Walla Walla Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, I. R. (2015). Policy mobilities and interdisciplinary engagement. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 835–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, I. R., & Ward, K. (2011). Trans-urban networks of learning, mega-events and policy tourism. Urban Studies, 48(12), 2519–2535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Landa, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London, UK: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degen, M., & García, M. (2012). The transformation of the ‘Barcelona Model’: an analysis of culture, urban regeneration and governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(5), 1022–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Economist. (2010). Is there a lot more to come? The country could get a taste for big sporting events. The Economist. London: The Economist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eick, V. (2010). A neoliberal sports event? FIFA from the Estadio Nacional to the fan mile. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 14(3), 278–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. (2009). Policy transfer in critical perspective. Policy Studies, 30(3), 243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farias, I., & Bender, T. (2010). Urban assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory changes urban studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick Schiller, N., & Salazar, N. B. (2013). Regimes of mobility across the globe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(2), 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González, S. (2011). Bilbao and Barcelona ‘in motion’: How urban regeneration ‘models’ travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism. Urban Studies, 48(7), 1397–1418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gotham, K. F. (2014). Mechanisms of mutation: Policy mobilities and the Gulf Opportunity (GO) Zone. Urban Geography, 35(8), 1171–1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabher, G., & Thiel, J. (2015). Projects, people, professions: Trajectories of learning through a mega-event (the London 2012 case). Geoforum, 65, 328–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horne, J., & Manzenreiter, W. (2016). The production of the spectacle: Labour and global sports mega-events. In N. B. Salazar, C. Timmerman, J. Wets, et al. (Eds.), Mega-event mobilities: A critical analysis (Chapter 2). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horne, J., & Whannel, G. (2012). Understanding the Olympics. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOC. (1994). 2002 Host city contract for the XXVIV Olympic Winter Games. Lausanne: LA84 Foundation archives.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOC. (2005). Technical manual on brand protection. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee. This is an embargoed document which was acquired and published via public records request by the activist group Games Monitor (gamesmonitor.co.uk).

  • IOC. (2014). The IOC Annual Report 2014: Credibility, sustainability and youth. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • IOC. (2015). Candidature process: Olympic Games 2024. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO. (1996). ISO14001: Environmental management systems. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardization.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO. (2012). ISO20121: Event sustainability management systems. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassens-Noor, E. (2013). Transport legacy of the Olympic Games, 1992–2012. Journal of Urban Affairs, 35(4), 393–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klauser, F. (2011). The exemplification of ‘Fan Zones’: Mediating mechanisms in the reproduction of best practices for security and branding at Euro 2008. Urban Studies, 48(15), 3203–3219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauermann, J. (2014a). Competition through inter-urban policymaking: bidding to host megaevents as entrepreneurial networking. Environment and Planning A, 46(11), 2638–2653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauermann, J. (2014b). Legacy after the bid? The impact of bidding to host Olympic Games on urban development planning. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee and Olympic Studies Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauermann, J. (2016). Made in transit: Mega-events and policy mobilities. In N. B. Salazar, C. Timmerman, J. Wets, et al. (Eds.), Mega-event mobilities: A critical perspective (Chapter 3). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E. (2010). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E. (2013). Policy boosterism, policy mobilities, and the extrospective city. Urban Geography, 34(1), 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012a). Assembling urbanism: Following policies and ‘studying through’ the sites and situations of policy making. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 42–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012b). Policy assemblages, mobilities and mutations: Toward a multidisciplinary conversation. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 325–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and critical urbanism. City, 15(2), 204–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monclús, F.-J. (2003). The Barcelona model: And an original formula? From ‘reconstruction’ to strategic urban projects (1979–2004). Planning Perspectives, 18(4), 399–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. (2014). The topological multiplicities of power: the limits of governing the Olympics. Economic Geography, 90(3), 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. (2015). (Im-)Mobile policies: Why sustainability went wrong in the 2014 Olympics in Sochi. European Urban and Regional Studies, 22(2), 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, A., & Collier, S. J. (2005). Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, M. (2006). Olympic turnaround: How the Olympic Games stepped back from the brink of extinction to become the world’s best known brand. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2011). Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 35(6), 773–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41(2), 169–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2012). Follow the policy: A distended case approach. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponzini, D., & Rossi, U. (2010). Becoming a creative city: The entrepreneurial mayor, network politics and the promise of an urban renaissance. Urban Studies, 47(5), 1037–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, R. (2010). Policy transfer as policy assemblage: Making policy for the creative industries in New Zealand. Environment and Planning A, 42(1), 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvestre, G. (2013). Mobile Olympic planning: The circulation of policy knowledge between Barcelona and Rio de Janeiro 1993–1996. Geografias, Políticas Públicas e Dinâmicas Territoriais, 7369–7381, Campinas, Spain, October 7–10, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 545–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surborg, B., VanWynsberghe, R., & Wyly, E. (2008). Mapping the Olympic growth machine. City, 12(3), 341–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temenos, C., & McCann, E. (2013). Geographies of policy mobilities. Geography Compass, 7(5), 344–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TSE Consulting. (2010). Developing a winning sports event strategy. Lausanne: TSE Consulting.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Oliver .

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Oliver, R., Lauermann, J. (2017). Policy Mobilities and the Bid. In: Failed Olympic Bids and the Transformation of Urban Space. Mega Event Planning. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59823-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59823-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59822-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59823-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics