Abstract
This chapter examines how political strategies and policy knowledge travel across cities bidding for the Olympics. It introduces urban studies scholarship on “policy mobilities”—interurban flows of expertise, knowledge, and models. This chapter focuses on the role of the bid consulting industry in facilitating policy mobilities, seen particularly in the mobility of expertise surrounding urban technology, sustainability, and urban architecture and design. This chapter argues that policy mobilities are driven by import imperatives (e.g., the need for cities to hire international experts when designing their bids) and by export imperatives (e.g., the desire to legitimate local projects by linking them to globally replicable policy models or templates).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acuto, M. (2013). City leadership in global governance. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 19(3), 481–498.
Allen, J., & Cochrane, A. (2014). The urban unbound: London’s politics and the 2012 Olympic Games. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(5), 1609–1624.
Barcelona Olympic Office. (1986). Projet de planification des besoins en informatique et télécommunications pour les Jeux Olympiques de 1992 / BIT ‘92. (Archival document). Lausanne: Olympic Studies Centre archives.
Barcelona Olympic Office. (1993). Official Report of the XXV Olympiad Barcelona 1992 (Vol. 3) (Archival document). Los Angeles, CA: LA84 Olympic Legacy Foundation archives.
Beal, V., & Pinson, G. (2014). When mayors go global: International strategies, urban governance and leadership. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(1), 302–317.
Boykoff, J. (2014). Celebration capitalism and the Olympic games. London: Routledge.
Boyle, P., & Haggerty, K. D. (2009). Spectacular security: Mega-events and the security complex. International Political Sociology, 3(3), 257–274.
Cashman, R. I., & Harris, R. (2012). The Australian olympic caravan from 2000 to 2012: A unique olympic events industry. Sydney: Walla Walla Press.
Cook, I. R. (2015). Policy mobilities and interdisciplinary engagement. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 835–837.
Cook, I. R., & Ward, K. (2011). Trans-urban networks of learning, mega-events and policy tourism. Urban Studies, 48(12), 2519–2535.
De Landa, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London, UK: Continuum.
Degen, M., & García, M. (2012). The transformation of the ‘Barcelona Model’: an analysis of culture, urban regeneration and governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(5), 1022–1038.
Dolowitz, D., & Marsh, D. (1996). Who learns what from whom: A review of the policy transfer literature. Political Studies, 44(2), 343–357.
Economist. (2010). Is there a lot more to come? The country could get a taste for big sporting events. The Economist. London: The Economist.
Eick, V. (2010). A neoliberal sports event? FIFA from the Estadio Nacional to the fan mile. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action, 14(3), 278–297.
Evans, M. (2009). Policy transfer in critical perspective. Policy Studies, 30(3), 243–268.
Farias, I., & Bender, T. (2010). Urban assemblages: How Actor-Network Theory changes urban studies. London: Routledge.
Glick Schiller, N., & Salazar, N. B. (2013). Regimes of mobility across the globe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(2), 183–200.
González, S. (2011). Bilbao and Barcelona ‘in motion’: How urban regeneration ‘models’ travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism. Urban Studies, 48(7), 1397–1418.
Gotham, K. F. (2014). Mechanisms of mutation: Policy mobilities and the Gulf Opportunity (GO) Zone. Urban Geography, 35(8), 1171–1195.
Grabher, G., & Thiel, J. (2015). Projects, people, professions: Trajectories of learning through a mega-event (the London 2012 case). Geoforum, 65, 328–337.
Horne, J., & Manzenreiter, W. (2016). The production of the spectacle: Labour and global sports mega-events. In N. B. Salazar, C. Timmerman, J. Wets, et al. (Eds.), Mega-event mobilities: A critical analysis (Chapter 2). London: Routledge.
Horne, J., & Whannel, G. (2012). Understanding the Olympics. New York, NY: Routledge.
IOC. (1994). 2002 Host city contract for the XXVIV Olympic Winter Games. Lausanne: LA84 Foundation archives.
IOC. (2005). Technical manual on brand protection. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee. This is an embargoed document which was acquired and published via public records request by the activist group Games Monitor (gamesmonitor.co.uk).
IOC. (2014). The IOC Annual Report 2014: Credibility, sustainability and youth. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee.
IOC. (2015). Candidature process: Olympic Games 2024. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee.
ISO. (1996). ISO14001: Environmental management systems. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardization.
ISO. (2012). ISO20121: Event sustainability management systems. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardization.
Kassens-Noor, E. (2013). Transport legacy of the Olympic Games, 1992–2012. Journal of Urban Affairs, 35(4), 393–416.
Klauser, F. (2011). The exemplification of ‘Fan Zones’: Mediating mechanisms in the reproduction of best practices for security and branding at Euro 2008. Urban Studies, 48(15), 3203–3219.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lauermann, J. (2014a). Competition through inter-urban policymaking: bidding to host megaevents as entrepreneurial networking. Environment and Planning A, 46(11), 2638–2653.
Lauermann, J. (2014b). Legacy after the bid? The impact of bidding to host Olympic Games on urban development planning. Lausanne: International Olympic Committee and Olympic Studies Centre.
Lauermann, J. (2016). Made in transit: Mega-events and policy mobilities. In N. B. Salazar, C. Timmerman, J. Wets, et al. (Eds.), Mega-event mobilities: A critical perspective (Chapter 3). London: Routledge.
McCann, E. (2010). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107–130.
McCann, E. (2013). Policy boosterism, policy mobilities, and the extrospective city. Urban Geography, 34(1), 5–29.
McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012a). Assembling urbanism: Following policies and ‘studying through’ the sites and situations of policy making. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 42–51.
McCann, E., & Ward, K. (2012b). Policy assemblages, mobilities and mutations: Toward a multidisciplinary conversation. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 325–332.
McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and critical urbanism. City, 15(2), 204–224.
Monclús, F.-J. (2003). The Barcelona model: And an original formula? From ‘reconstruction’ to strategic urban projects (1979–2004). Planning Perspectives, 18(4), 399–421.
Müller, M. (2014). The topological multiplicities of power: the limits of governing the Olympics. Economic Geography, 90(3), 321–339.
Müller, M. (2015). (Im-)Mobile policies: Why sustainability went wrong in the 2014 Olympics in Sochi. European Urban and Regional Studies, 22(2), 191–209.
Ong, A., & Collier, S. J. (2005). Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problems. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Payne, M. (2006). Olympic turnaround: How the Olympic Games stepped back from the brink of extinction to become the world’s best known brand. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.
Peck, J. (2011). Geographies of policy: From transfer-diffusion to mobility-mutation. Progress in Human Geography, 35(6), 773–797.
Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2010). Mobilizing policy: Models, methods, and mutations. Geoforum, 41(2), 169–174.
Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2012). Follow the policy: A distended case approach. Environment and Planning A, 44(1), 21–30.
Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404.
Ponzini, D., & Rossi, U. (2010). Becoming a creative city: The entrepreneurial mayor, network politics and the promise of an urban renaissance. Urban Studies, 47(5), 1037–1057.
Prince, R. (2010). Policy transfer as policy assemblage: Making policy for the creative industries in New Zealand. Environment and Planning A, 42(1), 169–186.
Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006). The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 207–226.
Silvestre, G. (2013). Mobile Olympic planning: The circulation of policy knowledge between Barcelona and Rio de Janeiro 1993–1996. Geografias, Políticas Públicas e Dinâmicas Territoriais, 7369–7381, Campinas, Spain, October 7–10, 2013.
Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 545–566.
Surborg, B., VanWynsberghe, R., & Wyly, E. (2008). Mapping the Olympic growth machine. City, 12(3), 341–355.
Temenos, C., & McCann, E. (2013). Geographies of policy mobilities. Geography Compass, 7(5), 344–357.
TSE Consulting. (2010). Developing a winning sports event strategy. Lausanne: TSE Consulting.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Oliver, R., Lauermann, J. (2017). Policy Mobilities and the Bid. In: Failed Olympic Bids and the Transformation of Urban Space. Mega Event Planning. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59823-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59823-3_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59822-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59823-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)