Advertisement

The Neo-Futurists(’) Take on Eugene O’Neill’s Strange Interlude

  • Adrian CurtinEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Adaptation in Theatre and Performance book series (ATP)

Abstract

In 2009, Greg Allen, founder of the US experimental theatre company The Neo-Futurists, offered a distinctive take on Eugene O’Neill’s 1928 play Strange Interlude. The five-and-a-half-hour-long production was both rapturously and rancorously received, prompting standing ovations and walkouts in its short run. This was a twenty-first century, ironic presentation of Strange Interlude that exploited and revelled in the play’s strangeness by revealing it anew. The production offers insight not only into O’Neill’s play but also into his authorial presence in the text, the construction of his authority and canonicity, and the legacy of modernist experimentation. This chapter ponders the way in which modernist play-texts can be ‘re-made new’ for the stage, to adapt Ezra Pound’s famous dictum, using this inventive, irreverent production as a case study.

Works Cited

  1. Bogard, Travis, and Jackson R. Bryer, eds. Selected Letters of Eugene O’Neill. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1988. Print.Google Scholar
  2. Dowling, Robert M. Eugene O’Neill: A Literary Reference to His Life and Work. Vol. 2, 2vols. New York: Facts on File, Inc, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
  3. Gilman, Richard. Common and Uncommon Masks: Writings on Theatre, 1961–1970. New York: Random, 1971. Print.Google Scholar
  4. Gross, Robert F. “O’Neill’s Queer Interlude: Epicene Excess and Camp Pleasures.” Journal of Dramatic Theory and Criticism 12.1 (1997): 3–22. Print.Google Scholar
  5. Johnson, Katie N. “When Strange Is Good: A Neo-Futurist Strange Interlude.” The Eugene O’Neill Review 31 (2009): 114–21. Print.Google Scholar
  6. Kidnie, Margaret Jane. “Where Is Hamlet? Text, Performance, and Adaptation.” A Companion to Shakespeare and Performance (2007): 101–20. Print.Google Scholar
  7. O’Neill, Eugene. Strange Interlude. London: Jonathan Cape, 1928. Print.Google Scholar
  8. Puchner, Martin. Stage Fright: Modernism, Anti-Theatricality, and Drama. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 2002. Print.Google Scholar
  9. Savran, David. “Towards a Historiography of the Popular,” Theatre Survey 45.2 (2004): 211–217. Print.Google Scholar
  10. Shafer, Yvonne. Performing O’Neill: Conversations with Actors and Directors. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
  11. Sheaffer, Louis. O’Neill: Son and Artist. Boston: Little Brown, 1973. Print.Google Scholar
  12. Weber, Anne Nicholson. “Talk Theatre in Chicago.” March 16, 2009: Robert Falls and Greg Allen. Web.Google Scholar
  13. Wolff, Tamsen. “‘Eugenic O’Neill’ and the Secrets of Strange Interlude.” Theatre Journal 55.2 (2003): 215–34. Print.Google Scholar
  14. Worthen, William B. Print and the Poetics of Modern Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Print.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ExeterExeterUK

Personalised recommendations