Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Outline of Theoretical Psychology pp 103–132Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

The Consequences of “Positivism” in Psychology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Based on the argument that ontology precedes epistemology and that method is not necessarily the route that leads to knowledge, it is asked why psychology has embraced a methodologism and a narrow epistemology when debating questions about psychological knowledge, ways for achieving knowledge, and the meanings of knowledge more generally. Some critics have labeled mainstream psychology as positivist; yet, this assessment is not entirely accurate if one takes the history and goals of positivism into account. An important task of theoretical psychology remains to make these naïve empiricist commitments explicit, in their consequences for psychological knowledge. Concepts such as variables, causality, operationism, and explanation are challenged. Critical ideas such as that ontology and epistemology are in practice intertwined, how a commitment to a specific conceptualization of the subject matter implies specific methodological commitments and vice versa, as well as the roles of relevance, temporality, authority, society, and culture in knowledge-making are discussed. A methodological theory of truth is challenged. It is argued that psychologists do not provide scientific explanations, but rather theory-dependent interpretations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://archives.yalealumnimagazine.com/issues/00_03/landv.html#top

References

  • Aalen, O. O., & Frigessi, A. (2007). What can statistics contribute to a causal understanding? Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 34(1), 155–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adorno, T. W., Albert, H., Dahrendorf, R., Habermas, J., Pilot, H., & Popper, K. R. (1969). Der Positivismusstreit in der deutschen Soziologie [The positivism dispute in German sociology]. Neuwied, Germany: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcoff, L., & Potter, E. (Eds.). (1993). Feminist epistemologies. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. (2001). The basic works of Aristotle (R. McKeon, Ed.). New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, F. (1938). The advancement of learning and New Atlantis. London: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1605).

    Google Scholar 

  • Becher, E. (1905). The philosophical views of Ernst Mach. The Philosophical Review, 14(5), 535–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, P. W. (1927). The logic of modern physics. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, S. (2011). Psychology as a moral science: Perspectives on normativity. New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, A. C. (2014). History of psychology. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 872–878). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1945). On inductive logic. Philosophy of Science, 12(1), 72–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, S. D., & Wertz, F. J. (2015). An introduction to phenomenological research in psychology: Historical, conceptual, and methodological foundations. In K. J. Schneider, J. F. Pierson, & J. F. T. Bugental (Eds.), The handbook of humanistic psychology: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 275–295). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte, A. (1896). The positive philosophy of Auguste Comte (Freely translated and condensed by H. Martineau. With an introduction by F. Harrison). London: George Bell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1985). The methodological imperative in psychology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 15, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daston, L., & Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity. New York, NY: Zone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. (1957). Ideen über eine beschreibende und zergliedernde Psychologie [Ideas on a descriptive and analytical psychology]. In W. Dilthey (Ed.), Die geistige Welt: Einleitung in die Philosophie des Lebens (Gesammelte Schriften V. Band) [The mental world: Introduction to the philosophy of life (Collected writings: Volume 5)] (pp. 139–240). Stuttgart: Teubner. (Original work published 1894).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. (1959). Einleitung in die Geisteswissenschaften (Gesammelte Schriften I. Band) [Introduction to the human sciences (Collected writings: Volume 1)]. Stuttgart: Teubner. (Original work published 1883).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreier, O. (2007). Psychotherapy in everyday life. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Febbraro, A. R. (1998). Gender, mentoring, and research practices: Social psychologists trained at the University of Michigan, 1949–1974. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, M., & Ruglis, J. (2009). Circuits and consequences of dispossession: The racialized realignment of the public sphere for U.S. youth. Transforming Anthropology, 17(1), 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, D., & Fagan, R. (2003). Poverty and unemployment. In S. C. Carr & T. Sloan (Eds.), Poverty and psychology: From global perspective to local practice (pp. 87–101). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1997). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). New York, NY: Continuum. (Original work published 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantt, E. E., & Williams, R. N. (2014). Psychology and the legacy of Newtonianism: Motivation, intentionality, and the ontological gap. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 34(2), 83–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (2009). Relational being: Beyond self and community. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J., Josselson, R., & Freeman, M. (2015). The promises of qualitative inquiry. American Psychologist, 70(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 781–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Mindless statistics. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 33(5), 587–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1977). In a different voice: Women’s conceptions of self and of morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47(4), 481–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (1990). A phenomenological vision for psychology. In W. J. Baker, M. E. Hyland, R. Van Hezewijk, & S. Terwee (Eds.), Recent trends in theoretical psychology (Vol. II, pp. 27–36). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. D. (1992). Of immortal mythological beasts: Operationism in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 2(3), 291–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groeben, N., & Westmeyer, H. (1975). Kriterien psychologischer Forschung [Criteria for psychological research]. München: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interest (J. J. Shapiro, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1984). Wahrheitstheorien [Theories of truth]. In J. Habermas (Ed.), Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns [Preliminary and complimentary studies to the theory of communicative action] (pp. 127–183). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Suhrkamp. (Original work published 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1988). On the logic of the social sciences (S. W. Nicholsen & J. A. Stark, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. G. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R., & Secord, P. F. (1972). The explanation of social behaviour. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G. (1935). On the logical positivists’ theory of truth. Analysis, 2(4), 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G., & Oppenheim, P. (1948). Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A. B. (2015). The environment and disease: Association or causation? (Reprinted from JRSM, Vol. 58, 1965). Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 108(1), 32–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, K. (1972). Kritische Psychologie: Vorbereitende Arbeiten [Critical psychology: Preparatory works]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, K. (1981). Theorie und Experiment in der Psychologie: Eine grundlagenkritische Untersuchung (Zweite, um ein Nachwort erweiterte Auflage) [Theory and experiment in psychology: A study critical of its foundations] (2nd ed.). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter. (Original work published 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, K. (1983). Grundlegung der Psychologie [Laying the foundations for psychology]. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, K. (2013). Psychology: Social self-understanding on the reasons for action in the conduct of everyday life. In E. Schraube & U. Osterkamp (Eds.), Psychology from the standpoint of the subject: Selected writings of Klaus Holzkamp (pp. 233–351). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (1982). Dialectic of enlightenment. New York, NY: Continuum. (Original work published 1947).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (1988). An enquiry concerning human understanding (Introduction, notes, and editorial arrangement by Antony Flew). La Salle, IL: Open Court. (Original work published 1748).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. (2000). A treatise of human nature (D. F. Norton & M. J. Norton, Eds.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1739).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. P., & Weidman, N. M. (2004). Race, racism, and science: Social impact and interaction. Santa Barbara, CA: Abc-Clio.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1968). The meaning of truth: A sequel to ‘Pragmatism’. New York, NY: Greenwood. (Original work published 1909).

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1981). The principles of psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1890).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason (P. Guyer & A. W. Wood, Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1781).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F. (1985). Reflections on gender and science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, S. (1992). Psychology’s Bridgman vs Bridgman’s Bridgman: An essay in reconstruction. Theory and Psychology, 2(3), 261–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, S. (1993). “Psychology” or “the psychological studies”? American Psychologist, 48(8), 902–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamiell, J. T. (2010). Why was there no place for personalistic thinking in 20th century psychology? New Ideas in Psychology, 28(2), 135–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamiell, J. T. (2013). Statisticism in personality psychologists’ use of trait constructs: What is it? How was it contracted? Is there a cure? New Ideas in Psychology, 31(1), 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, F. A. (1950). The history of materialism and criticism of its present importance (E. C. Thomas, Trans.) (Third edition; with an introduction by B. Russell) (This translation first published in three volumes in 1877, 1890 and 1892; reissued in one volume in 1925; reprinted in 1950). New York, NY: The Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory Life: The social construction of scientific facts. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, W. (2016). A history of “relevance” in psychology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lykes, M. B. (2013). Participatory and action research as a transformative praxis: Responding to humanitarian crises from the margins. American Psychologist, 68(8), 774–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mach, E. (1872). Geschichte und die Wurzel des Satzes von der Erhaltung der Arbeit [The history and root of the principle of conservation of energy]. Prag: Calve.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mach, E. (1976). Knowledge and error: Sketches of the psychology of enquiry. Dordrecht: Reidel. (Original work published 1905).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (2003). Positivism, quantification and the phenomena of psychology. Theory and Psychology, 13(1), 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, M. H. (Ed.). (1951). Psychological theory: Contemporary readings. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (2003). The quantitative imperative: Positivism, naive realism and the place of qualitative methods in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 13(1), 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York, NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mølbak, R. L. (2011). Lived experience as a strife between earth and world: Toward a radical phenomenological understanding of the empirical. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 31(4), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morawski, J. G. (2015). Epistemological dizziness in the psychology laboratory: Lively subjects, anxious experimenters, and experimental relations, 1950–1970. Isis, 106(3), 567–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrissey, M. B. Q. (2015). Suffering narratives of older adults: A phenomenological approach to serious illness, chronic pain, recovery and maternal care. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson, I. (2011). “Shocking” masculinity: Stanley Milgram, “obedience to authority,” and the “crisis of manhood” in Cold War America. Isis, 102(2), 238–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Doherty, K. C., & Winston, A. (2014). Variable, overview. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology (pp. 2051–2062). New York, NY: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormiston, G. L., & Schrift, A. D. (Eds.). (1990). The hermeneutic tradition: From Ast to Ricoeur. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osbeck, L. M., Nersessian, N. J., Malone, K. R., & Newstetter, W. C. (2011). Science as psychology: Sense-making and identity in science practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (2002). Critical discursive psychology. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (2014). Psychology after discourse analysis: Concepts, methods, critique. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, M. (2013). The science of deception: Psychology and commerce in America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, M., & Hegarty, P. (2014). Psychology and sexuality in historical time. In D. L. Tolman, L. M. Diamond, J. A. Bauermeister, W. H. George, J. G. Pfaus, & L. M. Ward (Eds.), APA handbook of sexuality and psychology (Vol. 1: Person-based approaches) (pp. 63–78). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett, K. E., & Wilkinson, R. G. (2015). Income inequality and health: A causal review. Social Science & Medicine, 128, 316–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1989). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge (5th rev. ed.). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1992). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge. (Original work published 1935).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in numbers: The pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prilleltensky, I. (1994). The morals and politics of psychology: Psychological discourse and the status quo. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction: An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, F. C., Fowers, B. J., & Guignon, C. B. (1999). Re-envisioning psychology: Moral dimensions of theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruck, N. (2012). Schönheit als Zeugnis: Evolutionspsychologische Schönheitsforschung und Geschlechterungleichheit [Beauty as evidence: Evolutionary-psychological research on attractiveness and gender inequality]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, A., Sheese, K., & Ruck, N. (2015). Feminism and theoretical psychology. In J. Martin, J. Surgarman, & K. L. Slaney (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology: Methods, approaches, and new directions for social sciences (pp. 374–391). Malden, MA: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, C. (2000). Methodology of the oppressed. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraube, E. (2015). Why theory matters: Analytical strategies of critical psychology. Estudos de Psicologia (Special Issue on Critical Psychology), 32(3), 533–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schraube, E., & Højholt, C. (Eds.). (2016). Psychology and the conduct of everyday life. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slife, B. D. (2004). Taking practice seriously: Toward a relational ontology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 24(2), 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smedslund, J. (2011). Meaning of words and the use of axiomatics in psychological theory. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 31(2), 126–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stegmüller, W. (1979). Hauptströmungen der Gegenwartsphilosophie (Band II) [Main streams of current philosophy, Volume 2]. Stuttgart: Kröner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stetsenko, A. (2016). The transformative mind: Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to development and education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tafreshi, D., Slaney, K. L., & Neufeld, S. D. (2016). Quantification in psychology: Critical analysis of an unreflective practice. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 36(4), 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (1985). Philosophy and the human sciences: Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2001). Karl Marx and Wilhelm Dilthey on the socio-historical conceptualization of the mind. In C. Green, M. Shore, & T. Teo (Eds.), The transformation of psychology: Influences of 19th-century philosophy, technology, and natural science (pp. 195–218). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2005). The critique of psychology: From Kant to postcolonial theory. New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2008). From speculation to epistemological violence in psychology: A critical-hermeneutic reconstruction. Theory & Psychology, 18(1), 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2010). Ontology and scientific explanation: Pluralism as an a priori condition of psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 28(2), 235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2011). Empirical race psychology and the hermeneutics of epistemological violence. Human Studies, 34, 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2015a). Historical thinking as a tool for theoretical psychology: On objectivity. In J. Martin, J. Sugarman, & K. L. Slaney (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of theoretical and philosophical psychology: Methods, approaches and new directions for social sciences (pp. 135–150). New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2015b). Critical psychology: A geography of intellectual engagement and resistance. American Psychologist, 70(3), 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2017). From psychological science to the psychological humanities: Building a general theory of subjectivity. Review of General Psychology, 21(4), 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T., & Febbraro, A. R. (2003). Ethnocentrism as a form of intuition in psychology. Theory and Psychology, 13(5), 673–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, C. W. (Ed.). (1992). Positivism in psychology. Historical and contemporary problems. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torre, M. E., Fine, M., Stoudt, B. G., & Fox, M. (2012). Critical participatory action research as public science. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, & D. Rindskopf (Eds.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 171–184). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, R., Teo, T., & Baydala, A. (2014). A critical history and philosophy of psychology: Diversity of context, thought, and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weis, L., & Fine, M. (2012). Critically bifocality and circuits of privilege: Expanding critical ethnographic theory and design. Harvard Educational Review, 82(2), 173–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston, A. (2001). Cause into function: Ernst Mach and the reconstruction of explanation in psychology. In C. D. Green, M. Shore, & T. Teo (Eds.), The transformation of psychology: Influences of 19th-century philosophy, technology, and natural science (pp. 107–131). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, G. H. v. (1971). Explanation and understanding. London: Routledge and K. Paul.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Thomas Teo

Authors
  1. Thomas Teo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Teo, T. (2018). The Consequences of “Positivism” in Psychology. In: Outline of Theoretical Psychology. Palgrave Studies in the Theory and History of Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59651-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation