Skip to main content

Betrayal, Stagnation, and the Family Romantic in Ulysses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Joyce & Betrayal
  • 147 Accesses

Abstract

Stephen’s struggles in Ulysses are read as a failure of self-narration through betrayal specifically. The gruesome figure of the betrayed interferes fatally with the narratives of overcoming Stephen had relied on in Portrait. Where once he had used the structures of betrayal to enable a clear separation from the family and the national allegiances it represented, Stephen is unable to sustain his position as victim. Harangued by his mother’s accusing ghost, Stephen spends the day caught between the desire to sever finally and absolutely with his family, race, and nation, and the realization that even if this severance were possible, it would be too painful to achieve.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This technique was of course identified by Hugh Kenner under the colourful moniker “The Uncle Charles Principle,” in Joyce’s Voices (Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1979), 15–39. (Kenner 1979)

  2. 2.

    As he says to Stanislaus, “Absolute realism is impossible, of course. That we all know. But it’s quite enough that Ibsen has omitted all question of finance from his thirteen dramas.” 16 May 1907, qtd in JJ, 266–7.

  3. 3.

    Letter to Constantine Curran, LI, 55. For a discussion of “hemiplegia” as a term chosen with some precision, see Jean Kane, “Imperial Pathologies: Medical Discourse and Drink in Dubliners’ ‘Grace’,” Literature and Medicine 14.2 (1995): 191–209. (Kane 1995)

  4. 4.

    Barry McCrea, In the Company of Strangers: Family and Narrative in Dickens, Conan Doyle, Joyce and Proust (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011), 106. (McCrea 2011)

  5. 5.

    Kevin J. H. Dettmar, The Illicit Joyce of PostModernism: Reading against the Grain (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1996), 135. (Dettmar 1996)

  6. 6.

    Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals, trans. Walter Kauffman and R. J. Hollingdale (New York: Vintage Books, 1969), 24–56. (Nietzsche 1969)

  7. 7.

    Max Scheler, On Feeling, Valuing, and Knowing, ed. Harold J. Bershady (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992), 117. (Scheler 1992)

  8. 8.

    Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals, 36–7. This passage is in the “First Essay,” section 10.

  9. 9.

    Gilles Deleuze, Nietzschean Philosophy, trans. Hugh Tomlinson (London: Continuum, 1983), 119. (Deleuze 1983)

  10. 10.

    Deleuze, Nietzschean Philosophy, 117, 118.

  11. 11.

    Dettmar, The Illicit Joyce, 135.

  12. 12.

    Enda Duffy, The Subaltern “Ulysses”, 26–7. (Duffy 1994)

  13. 13.

    We should remember that Freud describes the child’s decision to go against the parent’s wishes (at least what they imagine to be the parent’s wishes) as a vital step in the family romance.

  14. 14.

    Compare with “the mimic warfare was no less ludicrous than unequal in a ground chosen to his disadvantage.” SH, 39.

  15. 15.

    Breaking up Stephen’s short monologue as I have, I may have destroyed its strange and awkward cohesion. As is so often the case, the meaning is found as much in the gaps between the utterances as in the utterances themselves. Here it is together: “Very unpleasant. Noble art of selfpretense. Personally, I detest action.” Stephen’s speech here is more like internal monologue than external dialogue and, indeed, in his drunken state he appears to be using Carr primarily as a spur to his own thought.

  16. 16.

    McCrea, Company of Strangers, 126.

  17. 17.

    McCrea, Company of Strangers, 117.

  18. 18.

    Bernard Benstock, James Joyce: The Undiscovered Country (Dublin: Gill and Macmillan, 1978), 44. (Benstock 1978)

  19. 19.

    Maud Ellmann, The Nets of Modernism: Henry James, Virginia Woolf, James Joyce, and Sigmund Freud (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 1. (Ellmann 2010)

  20. 20.

    As I suggested above, Stephen is more than capable of feeling the anguish of his young brothers and sisters, even where they do not (consciously, at any rate).

  21. 21.

    Bradley W. Buchanan, Oedipus against Freud, 106 (Buchanan 2010). Buchanan is thinking only of Duffy and doesn’t describe Stephen in this way.

  22. 22.

    Deane, A Portrait of the Artist, xx. (Deane 1992)

  23. 23.

    McCrea, Company of Strangers.

  24. 24.

    SL, 48.

  25. 25.

    Valente, James Joyce and the Problem of Justice, 54. (Valente 1995)

References

  • Benstock, Bernard. 1978. The Undiscovered Country. New York: Barnes and Noble.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Bradley W. 2010. Oedipus against Freud: Myth and the End(s) of Humanism in Twentieth-Century British Literature. London, ON: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1992. Introduction to Finnegans Wake. Edited by James Joyce, v–lii. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles. 1983. Nietzschean Philosophy. Trans. Hugh Tomlinson. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dettmar, Kevin J. H. 1996. The Illicit Joyce of Post Modernism: Reading against the Grain. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, Enda. 1994. The Subaltern “Ulysses”. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellmann, Maud. 2010. The Nets of Modernism: Henry James, Virginia Woolf, James Joyce, and Sigmund Freud. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, Jean. 1995. Imperial Pathologies: Medical Discourse and Drink in Dubliners’ “Grace”. Literature and Medicine 14.2: 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenner, Hugh. 1979. Joyce’s Voices. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrea, Barry. 2011. In the Company of Strangers: Family and Narrative in Dickens, Conan Doyle, Joyce and Proust. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1969. On the Genealogy of Morals. Trans. Walter Kauffman and R. J. Hollingdale. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheler, Max. 1992. On Feeling, Valuing, and Knowing. Edited by Harold J. Bershady. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valente, Joseph. 1995. James Joyce and the Problem of Justice: Negotiating Sexual and Colonial Difference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fraser, J.A. (2016). Betrayal, Stagnation, and the Family Romantic in Ulysses . In: Joyce & Betrayal. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59588-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics