Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Values in Work with People Who Commit Sex Crimes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Probation and Politics

  • 422 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter addresses the need to reflect critically on the values embodied in probation practice with sex offenders. It considers two areas: maintaining respectful practice whilst fulfilling a correctional role, and forms of knowledge. Debates concerning voluntary or mandated treatment are re-explored and developed incorporating notions of respect and insights from human rights perspectives. Epistemic values highlight the competing forms of knowledge that inform how sex crimes and people who commit them can be variously understood. The way we understand an issue shapes how we respond to it. The chapter concludes by drawing these issues together and suggesting that respectful practice requires ongoing critical reflection on both what we know and what we do.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abel, G. G., Becker, J. V., Mittelman, M. S., Cunningham-Rathner, J., Rouleau, J. L., & Murphy, W. D. (1987). Self-reported sex crimes of non-incarcerated paraphiliacs. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2(1), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babchishin, K. M., Hanson, K. R., & Hermann, C. A. (2011). The characteristics of online sex offenders: A meta-analysis. Sexual Abuse, 23(1), 92–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (Ed. and trans: C. Emerson). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, R. (1998). Community treatment in the United Kingdom. In W. L. Marshall, Y. M. Fernandez, S. M. Hudson, & T. Ward (Eds.), Sourcebook of treatment programs for sexual offenders (pp. 133–152). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beech, A. R., & Ward, T. (2004). The integration of etiology and risk in sexual offenders: A theoretical framework. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 31–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brongersma, E. (1988). A defence of sexual liberty for all age groups. The Howard Journal, 27(1), 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, M., & Drake, D. H. (2007). Reconsidering respect: Its role in her majesty’s prison service. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(2), 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comptroller and Auditor General. (2013). Ministry of Justice and National Offender Management Service: Managing the prison estate – a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General. London: National Audit Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, M., & Ward, T. (2008). Moral, rights and practice in the human services: Effective and fair decision-making in health, social care and criminal justice. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conte, J., Wolf, S., & Smith, T. (1989). What sex offenders tell us about prevention strategies. Child Abuse & Neglect, 13, 293–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D. A. G., Fox, C. A., Weaver, C. M., & Rooth, F. G. (1991). The Berkeley Group: Ten years’ experience of a group for non-violent sex offenders. British Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 238–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, D. M., Zanis, D. A., Wesnoski, S. A., Palman, N., Gur, A., Lynch, K. G., et al. (2013). Does mandating offenders to treatment improve completion rates? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 44(4), 417–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowburn, M. (1990). Work with male sex offenders in groups. Groupwork, 3(2), 157–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowburn, M. (1993). Groupwork programmes for male sex offenders: Establishing principles for practice. In A. Brown & B. Caddick (Eds.), Groupwork with Offenders (pp. 218–230). London: Whiting & Birch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowburn, M. (1996). The black male sex offender in prison: Images and issues. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 2(2), 122–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowburn, M. (2005). Confidentiality and public protection: Ethical dilemmas in qualitative research with adult male sex offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11(1), 49–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowburn, M. (2006). Constructive work with male sex offenders: Male forms of life, language games and change. In N. Parton, P. O’Byrne, K. Gorman, & M. Gregory (Eds.), Constructive probation work. London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowburn, M. (2010). Invisible men: Social reactions to male sexual coercion – Bringing men and masculinities into community safety and public policy. Critical Social Policy, 30(2), 225–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowburn, M., & Bains, H. (2008). Diversity review on: Thinking Skills Programme. London: Unpublished Report for H.M. Prison Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowburn, M., & Modi, P. (1995). Justice in an unjust context: Implications for working with adult male sex offenders. In D. Ward & M. Lacey (Eds.), Probation working for justice (pp. 185–207). London: Whiting & Birch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowburn, M., & Myers, S. (2016). Social work with sex offenders: Making a difference. Bristol: Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowburn, M., Wilson, C., & Loewenstein, P. (editor of additional contributions). (1992). Changing men: A practice guide to working with adult male sex offenders. Nottingham: Nottinghamshire Probation Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowburn, M., Lavis, V., & Walker, T. (2008a). BME sex offenders in prison: The problem of participation in offending behaviour groupwork programmes – A tripartite model of understanding. British Journal of Community Justice, 6(1), 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowburn, M., Lavis, V., & Walker, T. (2008b). Black minority ethnic sex offenders. Prison Service Journal, 178, 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowburn, M., Gill, A. K., & Harrison, K. (2015). Speaking about sexual abuse in British South Asian communities: Offender, victims and the challenges of shame and reintegration. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 21(1), 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crombie, I. K., & Davies, H. T. O. (2009). What is meta-analysis? http://www.medicine.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/painres/download/whatis/meta-an.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2014.

  • Elliott, M., Browne, K., & Kilcoyne, J. (1995). Child sexual abuse prevention: What offenders tell us. Child Abuse & Neglect, 19(5), 579–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furby, L., Weinrott, R. M., & Blackshaw, L. (1989). Sex offender recidivism: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavey, N. (2005). Just sex: The cultural scaffolding of rape. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelsthorpe, L. (2007). Probation values and human rights. In L. Gelsthorpe & R. Morgan (Eds.), Handbook of probation (pp. 485–517). Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. (2003). Therapeutic jurisprudence: An ethical paradigm for therapists in sex offender treatment programs. Western Criminology Review, 4(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., & Bussiere, M. T. (1998). Predicting relapse: A meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies. Journal of Counselling and Clinical Psychology, 66(2), 348–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K., & Morton-Bourgon, K. E. (2005). The characteristics of persistent sexual offenders: A meta-analysis of recidivism studies. Journal of Counselling and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, K. (2008). Legal and ethical issues when using Antiandrogenic Pharmacotherapy with sex offenders. Sex Offender Treatment. http://www.sexual-offender-treatment.org/2-2008_01.html. Accessed 14 November 2015.

  • Home Office. (1992). National Standards for the supervision of offenders in the community. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, S. (1985). Woman’s experience of sex. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A. (2004). Prisons and their moral performance: A study of values, quality and prison life (assisted by Helen Arnold). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. E., & Barnett, G. D. (2012). Victim empathy intervention with sexual offenders: Rehabilitation, punishment, or correctional quackery? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 25(3), 282–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, W. L., & Marshall, L. E. (2012). Treatment of sexual offenders: Effective elements and appropriate outcome evaluations. Advances in Program Evaluation, 13, 71–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. (Ed.). (2015). A compendium of research and analysis on the Offender Assessment System (OASys) 2009–2013. London: National Offender Management Service – Ministry of Justice Analytical Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nel, J. A., Rich, E., & Joubert, K. D. (2007). Lifting the veil: Experiences of gay men in a therapy group. South African Journal of Psychology, 37(2), 284–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, S. (1982). Incest: Fact & myth. Edinburgh: Stramullion.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Carroll, T. (1980). Paedophilia: The radical case. London: Peter Owen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parhar, K. K., Wormwith, J. S., Derkzen, D. M., & Beauregarde, A. M. (2008). Offender coercion in treatment: A meta-analysis of effectiveness. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(9), 1109–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, D. (1987). A psychological treatment programme for sex offenders. In B. J. McGurk, D. M. Thornton, & M. Williams (Eds.), Applying psychology to imprisonment: Theory and practice. Norwich: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office

    Google Scholar 

  • Probation Institute. (2014). Code of ethics: Core values and ethical principles. London: Probation Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, G., Burke, L., & Millings, M. (2015). Criminal justice identities in transition: The case of devolved probation services in England and Wales. British Journal of Criminology, 1–18. doi:10.1093/bjc/azv036

    Google Scholar 

  • Salter, A. C. (1988). Treating child sexual offenders and victims: A practical guide. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanday, P. R. (2003). Rape-free versus rape-prone: How culture makes a difference. In C. B. Travis (Ed.), Evolution, gender, and rape (pp. 337–362). Cambridge, MA: The MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapland, J., Bottoms, A. E., Farrall, S., McNeill, F., Priede, C., & Robinson, G. (2012). The quality of probation supervision – A literature review. Sheffield: Centre for Criminological Research, University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheath, M. (1990). Confrontative work with sex offenders: Legitimised nonce-bashing? Probation Journal, 37(4), 159–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegert, R. J., Ward, T., Levack, W. M., & McPherson, K. M. (2007). A good lives model of clinical and community rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 29(20–21), 1604–1615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E., & Miller, L. L. (2002). A cautionary note on the use of actuarial risk assessment tools for social control. Crime and Delinquency, 48(1), 138–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soothill, K. L., & Gibbens, T. C. N. (1978). Recidivism of sex offenders: A reappraisal. British Journal of Criminology, 18(3), 267–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ware, J., & Mann, R. E. (2012). How should ‘acceptance of responsibility’ be addressed in sexual offending treatment programs? Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worrall, A. (2013). Community sentences. In E. McLaughlin & J. Muncie (Eds.), The Sage Dictionary of Criminology (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Law and Criminology, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK

    Malcolm Cowburn

Authors
  1. Malcolm Cowburn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malcolm Cowburn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Law , Swansea University, Swansea, United Kingdom

    Maurice Vanstone

  2. Bristol, United Kingdom

    Philip Priestley

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cowburn, M. (2016). Values in Work with People Who Commit Sex Crimes. In: Vanstone, M., Priestley, P. (eds) Probation and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59557-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59557-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-59556-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-59557-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation