Skip to main content

Nonfiction Film: Theoretical Frameworks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Ministry of Education Film Experiment
  • 221 Accesses

Abstract

In Nonfiction Film: Theoretical Frameworks Southern discusses historical definitions of the documentary film and theoretical standpoints that attempt to define nonfiction as a film form in terms of stylistic techniques, audience reception and philosophical concepts of non-/fiction. Southern analyses post-modern and post-structural nonfiction film theories in relation to concepts of nonfiction modes, ‘objectivity’, ‘reality’ and ‘truth’, which she applies to her analysis of the Ministry of Education films in the following chapter. Southern asserts that the concepts of ‘objectivity’, ‘truth’ and the representation of reality form a complex interrelationship within the discourse of nonfiction, constructed through the audience’s engagement with the text and its indexing. In creating this discourse, she argues, the audience must be complicit with the text, raising questions of ‘objectivity’ and reliability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Filmography

Bibliography

  • Blade Runner. (1982). Directed by Ridley Scott. Los Angeles: Warner Bros. Pictures [Film: 35 mm].

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling for Columbine. (2002). Directed by Michael Moore. London: Momentum Pictures [DVD].

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass Eye, 2. (2001, July 26). Paedophilia. London: Channel 4 [video: VHS].

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges-Go-Round. (1958). Directed by Shirley Clarke. New York: Shirley Clarke [Film: 16 mm].

    Google Scholar 

  • Capitalism: A Love Story. (2009). Directed by Michael Moore. Beverly Hills: Overture Films [Film: 35 mm].

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrenheit 9/11. (2004). Directed by Michael Moore. Santa Monica: Lionsgate Films [Film: 35 mm].

    Google Scholar 

  • Man With a Movie Camera. (1929). Directed by Dziga Vertov. Odesa: VUFKU [Film: 35 mm].

    Google Scholar 

  • March of the Penguins. (2005). Directed by Luc Jacquet. Los Angeles: Warner Independent Pictures [Film: 35 mm].

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger & Me. (1989). Directed by Michael Moore. Los Angeles: Warner Bros [Film: 35mm].

    Google Scholar 

  • Sicko. (2007). Directed by Michael Moore. Santa Monia: Lions Gate Films [Film: 35 mm].

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnouw, E. (1993). Documentary. A history of the non-fiction film (2nd Revised ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazin, A. (1967). What is cinema? Essays selected and translated by Hugh Gray (Vol. 1). Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordwell, D., & Thompson, K. (Eds.). (1997). Film art. An introduction (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Film Institute. (1933). The British Film Institute. Its aims and objects. London: BFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Film Institute. (1944). Visual education and film appreciation. A summary of some of the speeches delivered at the British Film Institute’s Summer School at Bangor, August, 1944. London: BFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, P. (1996). Reading for the Plot. In: Onega, S. and Garcia Landa, J.A. (Eds) Narratology: An Introduction (pp. 251-261). London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, N. (1996). Nonfiction film and postmodernist scepticism. In D. Bordwell & N. Carroll (Eds.), Post-theory. Reconstructing film studies (pp. 283–306). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J. (2006). Part II: Documentary. Introduction. In N. Carroll & J. Choi (Eds.), Philosophy of film and motion pictures. An anthology (pp. 137–139). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Educational and Cultural Films. (1932). The film in national life. London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G. (1996). Film, reality, and illusion. In D. Bordwell & N. Carroll (Eds.), Post-theory. Reconstructing film studies (pp. 325–344). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes, J. (1948c). Correspondence to Miss R. Power. 3rd February 1948. The National Archives collection: ED 121/565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metz, C. (1991). Film language. A semiotics of the cinema. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neale, S. (1980). Genre. London: BFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, B. (1991). Representing reality. Issues and concepts in documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, B. (2010). Introduction to documentary (2nd ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, C. R. (1997). Rhetoric and representation in the nonfiction film. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renov, M. (Ed.). (1993). Theorizing documentary. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, B. (1993). Documentary film as scientific inscription. In M. Renov (Ed.), Theorizing documentary (pp. 37–57). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, B. (1995). Claiming the real. The documentary film revisited. London: BFI.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Southern, A. (2016). Nonfiction Film: Theoretical Frameworks. In: The Ministry of Education Film Experiment. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59230-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics