The Seduction of Kierkegaard’s Aesthetic Sphere

  • Kevin GaryEmail author


Though sensitivity to pedagogy infuses all of Søren Kierkegaard’s writings, Kierkegaard’s voice in education, and moral education specifically, is scant. This is striking considering the range and depth of his influence in philosophy and theology. Given the ethico-religious telos that animates Kierkegaard’s project, and the amazing variety of texts that illuminate and enact the existential journey into lived virtue, Kierkegaard offers a wealth of resources for pedagogies that aspire to cultivate virtue. Yet Kierkegaard does, as his pseudonym Johannas Climacus intends, create difficulties. Specifically, he exposes how difficult it is to become and remain virtuous. Moreover, he reveals how difficult it is to teach others how to become virtuous, all the while enacting a pedagogy that intends to do just that. In this essay I make a case for Kierkegaard’s indispensable contribution to a pedagogy that aims to impart virtue. Specifically, I examine the challenge the aesthetic sphere poses for virtue ethics, noting the interior moves that precede, undergird, and sustain the transition from the aesthetic to the ethical sphere. I then explore Kierkegaard’s pedagogical approach that aims to reach the aesthete.


Critical Thinking Virtue Ethic Moral Education Aesthetic Sensibility Oedipus Complex 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bauman, Z. (1999). The self in a consumer society. Hedgehog Review, available at
  2. Biesta, G. (2013). Receiving the gift of teaching: from ‘learning from’ to ‘being taught by’. Studies in Philosophy & Education, 32 (5), 449–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bigelow, P. (1997). The brokenness of philosophic desire: Edifying discourses and the embarrassment of the philosopher. In Kierkegaard studies monograph series: Kierkegaard revisited ed. Cappelørn, Niels Jørgen and Stewart, Jon. New York: De Gruter.Google Scholar
  4. Brueggemann, W. (2001). The Prophetic Imagination, 2nd ed. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  5. Dunne, J. (2001). Alasdair MacIntyre on education: in dialogue with Joseph Dunne. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 36 (2).Google Scholar
  6. Edmundson, M. (1997). On the uses of liberal education. Harpers Magazine. Google Scholar
  7. Holmer, P. (1968). Kierkegaard and philosophy. In New Themes in Christian Philosophy, ed. McInerny, Ralph. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hughes, C. (2014). Kierkegaard and the Staging of Desire: Rhetoric and Performance in a Theology of Eros. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Jung, C. (1983). Word and Image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  10. See essays in (2001). Kierkegaard After MacIntyre, eds. Davenport & Rudd. Eds. Philip L. Quinn, Anthony Rudd, John J. Davenport.Google Scholar
  11. Kevorkian, J. (1998) Interviewed by Mike Wallace, 60 Minutes, CBS News. The dialogue between Kevorkian and Youk is transcribed from a video that was included in the CBS broadcast of Mike Wallace’s interview of Kevorkian. The description of Youk in the quoted dialogue is also transcribed from the CBS broadcast. The interview is available at:
  12. Kierkegaard, S. (1940). The Present Age and of the Difference Between a Genius and an Apostle, Translated by Alexander Dru. New York: Harper Torchbook.Google Scholar
  13. Kierkegaard, S. (1975). Journals and papers vol. IV, Translated by and ed. Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. London: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kierkegaard, S. (1983). Sickness Unto Death: A Christian Psychological Exposition for Upbuilding and Awakening, eds. Howard and Edna Hong. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kierkegaard, S. (1987). Either/Or. Edited by Howard and Edna Wong. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Kierkegaard, S. (1989). Concept of Irony. Edited by Howard and Edna Wong. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kierkegaard, S. (1992). Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Vol. I. Translated. by H. V. Hong and E. H. Hong. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: moral stages and the idea of justice. Essays on Moral Development, Vol. I. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
  19. Lickona, T. (1992). Educating for Character: How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility. New York: Bantum BooksGoogle Scholar
  20. MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame PressGoogle Scholar
  21. Macpherson, I. (2001). Kierkegaard as an educational thinker: communication through and across ways of being. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35, 2.Google Scholar
  22. O’Connor (1977). Mystery and Manners. New York: Farrar Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
  23. Percy, W. (1998). The Moviegoer. New York: First Vintage International.Google Scholar
  24. Russell, B. (1996). The Conquest of Happiness. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Sæverot, H. (2011). Kierkegaard, seduction, and existential education. Studies in Philosophy & Education, 30 (6), 557–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sartre, J.P. (1969). Nausea (trans. by Alexander, L). Norfolk, CT: New Directions.Google Scholar
  27. Szekely, L., aka Louis C.K. (2012). Clip retrieved from:
  28. Szekely, L., aka Louis C.K. (2008), Interview with Conan O’Brien. Available at:
  29. Taylor, C. (2007). The sting of death. Commonweal, October.Google Scholar
  30. Wallace, D. F. (2007). Deciderization 2007—a special report. Available at:
  31. Wallace, D. F. (2006). Infinite Jest. Back Bay Books.Google Scholar
  32. West, C (2006). Democracy matters. Lecture given at Washington University-St. Louis, available at: Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationValparaiso UniversityValparaisoUSA

Personalised recommendations