Skip to main content

“Till We Have Faces”: Second-Person Relatedness as the Object, End and Crucial Circumstance of Perfect or “Infused” Virtues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Varieties of Virtue Ethics
  • 1394 Accesses

Abstract

Does any child ever first acquire virtue in an Aristotelian manner? A subtle interpersonal play is the more typical locus of initial ethical formation. Moreover, many modern experiments, such as a picture of a pair of eyes being glued to an “honesty box” (Bateson et al. 2006), reveal how even a lifeless representation that evokes a sense of “second-person relatedness” (SPR) subtly encourages virtuous actions by adults. Classical virtue ethics does not easily accommodate these phenomena, but I have argued previously (Pinsent 2012) that the “infused” dispositions described by St Thomas Aquinas can be understood in terms of SPR. In this chapter, I propose that these insights, with some corroboration from contemporary social neuroscience, highlight the need for a “Copernican Revolution” of virtue ethics. I also review briefly some implications and propose ways in which the role of infused or second-person dispositions might be tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Assal, G. (2001). Prosopagnosia. Bulletin de l’Académie Nationale de Médecine, 185 (3), 525–535; discussion 535–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Jonathan, ed. (1984). Nicomachean ethics. In Complete works of Aristotle, volume 2: The revised Oxford translation, translated by Sir David Ross and James Opie Urmson. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, M., Nettle, D., & Roberts, G. (2006). Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters, 2 (3), 412–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belin, P. (2011). “Hearing voices”: Neurocognition of the human voice. In J. Decety & J. Cacioppo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social neuroscience (pp. 378–393). NewYork: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. R., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2003). Philosophical foundations of neuroscience. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P. (2013). Just babies: The origins of good and evil. New York: Crown Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodamer, J. (1947). Die prosop-agnosie. Archiv Für Psychiatrie Und Nervenkrankheiten, 179, 6–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76 (6), 893–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeYoung, Rebecca Konyndyk. (2003). Power made perfect in weakness: Aquinas’s transformation of the virtue of courage. Medieval Philosophy and Theology, 11 (2): 147–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare: The evolution of human consciousness. New York; London: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, D. (2009). Finding our tongues: Mothers, infants and the origins of language. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farah, M. J., Levinson, K. L., & Klein, K. L. (1995). Face perception and within-category discrimination in prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 33 (6), 661–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freiwald, W. A., Tsao, D. Y., & Livingstone, M. S. (2009). A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 12 (9), 1187–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, K. M., Leon, S. A., & Rosenbek, J. C. (2004). Affective aprosodia from a medial frontal stroke. Brain and Language, 89 (3), 411–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, R. P. & Lee A. (1998). Hello and goodbye: A study of social engagement in autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 28, 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, P. (2005). What puts jointness into joint attention? In N. Eilan et al. (Eds.), Joint attention: Communication and other minds (pp. 185–204). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, B. M., Willen, J. D., & Driver, J. (1998). Adult’s eyes trigger shifts of visual attention in human infants. Psychological Science, 9 (2), 131–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirwan, M. L., White, L. K., & Fox, N. A. (2011). The emotion-attention interface: Neural, developmental, and clinical considerations. In J. Decety & J. Cacioppo (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of social neuroscience (pp. 227–242). NewYork: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legge, B. (2002). Can’t eat, won’t eat dietary difficulties and autistic spectrum disorders. London; Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Annie S., Elizabeth A. Kelley, Angela D. Evans, and Kang Lee. 2010. “Exploring the Ability to Deceive in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders.” Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 41 (2): 185–95. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-1045-4..

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, R. D., & Macropoulos, A. (2008). Wal-Mart Employee Trampled to Death. The New York Times, November 28, sec. Business. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/29/business/29walmart.html.

  • Meltzoff, A. N., & Moore, M. K. (1977). Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates. Science, 198, 75–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrett, D. I., Smith, P. A., Potter, D. D., Mistlin, A. J., Head, A. S., Milner, A. D., & Jeeves, M. A. (1985). Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing papers of a Biological character. Royal Society (Great Britain), 223 (1232), 293–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsent, A. (2012). The second-person perspective in Aquinas’s ethics: Virtues and gifts. New York; Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsent, A. (2014a). Neurotheological eudaimonia. In J. Clausen & N. Levy (Eds.), Handbook of neuroethics, (pp. 1603–1617). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinsent, A. (2014b). Avarice and liberality. In K. Timpe & C. Boyd (Eds.), Virtues and their vices, (pp. 157–176). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolls, E. T. (2007). The representation of information about faces in the temporal and frontal lobes. Neuropsychologia, 45 (1), 124–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. (1980). Margaret Thatcher: A new illusion. Perception, 9 (4), 483–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81 (1), 141–145.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pinsent, A. (2017). “Till We Have Faces”: Second-Person Relatedness as the Object, End and Crucial Circumstance of Perfect or “Infused” Virtues. In: Carr, D., Arthur, J., Kristjánsson, K. (eds) Varieties of Virtue Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59177-7_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics