Skip to main content

Reconceptualising Digital Storytelling: Thinking Through Audiovisual Inquiry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Drawing from longitudinal research with newcomer communities in Ireland, anthropological literature, and film theory and practice, Alexandra argues for a re-conceptualisation of the participatory media genre of Digital Storytelling (DS). Rather than understanding images and sound as “secondary concerns” disconnected from broader filmic practices, the chapter places DS in conversation with documentary and ethnographic arts. Arguing for the importance of both the audiovisual artefact and the intensively collaborative process that facilitates its creation, the finished artefact is conceptualised as an “embodied object”. Through inquiry, exchange and montage, this object is imbued with the knowledge, longings, and sensorial experience of a particular moment in the emergent practitioner’s life. The chapter concludes with an exploration of the connective tissue between DS and ethnographic and documentary film and video.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Alexandra, D. (2008). Digital storytelling as transformative practice: Critical analysis and creative expression in the representation of migration in Ireland. Journal of Media Practice, 9(2), 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexandra, D. (2015a). Visualizing migrant voices: Co-creative documentary and the politics of listening [Doctoral Dissertation]. Dublin, Ireland: Dublin Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexandra, D. (2015b). Are we listening yet? Participatory knowledge production through media practice: Encounters of political listening. In Gubrium, A., K. Harper & M. Otañez (Eds.), Participatory visual and digital research in action. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexandra, D. (2017). More than words: Co-creative visual ethnography. In Nuñez-Janes, M., A. Thornburg, & A. Booker (Eds.), Deep stories: Practicing, teaching, and learning anthropology with digital storytelling. Warsaw: De Gruyter Open. 

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, W. (1931). A short history of photography. https://monoskop.org/images/7/79/Benjamin_Walter_1931_1972_A_Short_History_of_Photography.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2017.

  • Benjamin, W. (1936). The work of art in the era of mechanical reproduction. https://monoskop.org/images/6/6d/Benjamin_Walter_1936_2008_The_Work_of_Art_in_the_Age_of_Its_Technological_Reproducibility_Second_Version.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2017.

  • Colleyn, J.P. (2005). Jean rouch: An anthropologist ahead of his time. American Anthropologist, 107(1), 113–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, T. (2011). The essay film: From Montaigne, after Marker. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, R. (1995). How to see (photographically). In P. Petro (Ed.), Fugitive images: From photography to video. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, E., & Hart, J. (Eds.). (2004). Introduction: photographs as objects. In Photographs objects histories: On the materiality of images (material cultures). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, S. (2003). Ciné-ethnography: Jean Rouch. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, F. (1995). The parallax effect: The impact of aboriginal media on ethnographic film. Visual Anthropology Review, 11(2), 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampl, P. (1996). Memory’s movies. In C. Warren (Ed.), Beyond document: Essays on nonfiction film. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDougall, D. (1978). Ethnographic film: Failure and promise. Annual Review of Anthropology, 7, 405–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, L. (2002). Touch: Sensuous theory and multisensory media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreo, E. (2012). On visibility and invisibility: Migrant practices between regimes of representations and self-determination. In R. Lentin & E. Moreo (Eds.), Migration, diasporas and citizenship (pp. 72–94). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, B. (2010). Introduction to documentary. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, J. (2014, May 5). 10 questions for Joshua Oppenheimer, IUCinema Online Interview. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnerL5WBB2M. Accessed 7 Nov 2015.

  • Pink, S. (2011). Images, senses and applications: Engaging visual anthropology. Visual Anthropology, 24(5), 437–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruby, J. (1991). Speaking for, speaking about, speaking with, or speaking alongside—An anthropological and documentary dilemma. Visual Anthropology Review, 7(2), 50–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C. (1999). Autoethnography: Journeys of the Self. In Experimental ethnography: The work of film in the age of video. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez-Laws, A. L. (2010). Digital storytelling as an emerging documentary form. Seminar. net, 6(3), 359–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A. (2014). Stills that move: Photofilm and anthropology. In A. Schneider & C. Pasqualino (Eds.), Experimental film and anthropology. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seremetakis, C. N. (1994). The senses still. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sontag, S. (1979). On photography. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurgeon, C. L., Burgess, J. E., Klaebe, H. G., Tacchi, J. A., McWilliam, K., & Tsai, M. (2009). Co-creative media: Theorising digital storytelling as a platform for researching and developing participatory culture. In Australian and New Zealand Communication Association Conference (pp 8–10). July 2009. Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, P. (1992). The cinematic Griot: The ethnography of Jean Rouch. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoller, P. (1997). Sensuous scholarship. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Threadgold, T. (2006). Dialogism, voice and global contexts: Asylum, dangerous men and invisible women. Australian Feminist Studies, 21(50), 223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1999). The aesthetics of ambiguity. In For documentary. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darcy Alexandra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Alexandra, D. (2017). Reconceptualising Digital Storytelling: Thinking Through Audiovisual Inquiry. In: Dunford, M., Jenkins, T. (eds) Digital Storytelling . Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-59152-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics