Energy Transitions

Chapter

Abstract

Scarcity is erroneously perceived as being what impels energy transitions, with policy actions hastening or impeding the process. This chapter argues that technological changes initiate recursive, often tentative, shifts in fuel usage. As society locks itself into certain patterns of supplying energy, energy transitions often exact high financial and organisational costs for existing firms and society. For this reason, in order to succeed, persistent dedication and considerable patience are demanded from managers, and stakeholders, as well as in terms of policy; but these are seldom forthcoming. Almost by default, firms rely on markets—imperfect as they are—for guidance before acting to secure their future. Two contrasting stories are examined: Transocean, an oilrig operator, hopes for better days when oil prices could rebound. In contrast Tesla, the pioneering electric vehicle company, sets out to seize opportunities hitherto unknown, which will potentially make oil obsolete. Rising financial losses are “balanced”, albeit precariously, by managerial optimism.

References

  1. Barry, J., Ellis, G., & Robinson, C. (2008). Cool rationalities and hot air: A rhetorical approach to understanding debates on renewable energy. Global Environmental Politics, 8(2), 67–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Botterud, A., & Korpås, M. (2007). A stochastic dynamic model for optimal timing of investments in new generation capacity in restructured power systems. Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 29, 163–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Byatt, I. (2008). Weighing the present against the future: The choice, and use, of rates of discount in the analysis of climate change. In C. Robinson (Ed.), Climate change policy: Challenging the activists (pp. 92–113). London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  4. Carregrow, J. (2003, August 7). Ailing Alstom will receive French government bailout. Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
  5. Chazan, G. (2016, May 18). Eon and RWE pursue radical restructurings. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  6. The Economist. (2004, May 6). The Alstom affair.Google Scholar
  7. Energy Information Administration (EIA). (2016, March). Wind and solar data and projections from the US Energy Information Administration: Past performance and on-going enhancements.Google Scholar
  8. Fouquet, R., & Pearson, P. J. G. (2012). Past and prospective energy transitions: Insights from history. Energy Policy, 50, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fuchs, R. (2016, June 9). German cabinet puts brakes on clean energy transition. DW.Google Scholar
  10. Galli, R. (1998). The relationship between energy intensity and income levels: Forecasting long-term energy demand in Asian emerging countries. The Energy Journal, 19(4), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Golub, R., & Townsend, J. (1977). Malthus, multinationals and the Club of Rome. Discussion Paper. Social Studies of Science, 7, 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grubler, A. (2012). Energy transitions research: Insights and cautionary tales. Energy Policy, 50, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hasset, K., & Metcalf, G. (1993). Do consumers discount the future correctly? Energy Policy, 21(6), 710–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hasset, K., & Metcalf, G. (1999). Investment with uncertain tax policy: Does random tax policy discourage investment? The Economic Journal, 109, 372–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heisler, Y. (2016, September 19). Watch Tesla’s blazing fast Model S P100D race a Lamborghini Huracan. BGR.Google Scholar
  16. Henderson, D. (2008). Governments and climate change issues: Questioning a consensus. In C. Robinson (Ed.), Climate change policy: Challenging the activists (pp. 70–91). London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  17. Holmes, A. (1992). Privatising British electricity: Restructuring and resistance. London: Financial Times Publications.Google Scholar
  18. Jaffe, A., & Stavins, R. (1994). The energy paradox and the diffusion of conservation technology. Resource and Energy Economics, 16, 91–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10, 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kern, F. (2012, February). The development of the CCGT and the ‘dash for gas’ in the UK power industry (1987–2000). UK Energy Research Centre, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
  21. Landauro, I. (2016, June 16). French nuclear firm Areva details $9 billion refinancing, shake up. Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
  22. Lewis, R. (2008). Global Alarmism. In C. Robinson (Ed.), Climate change policy: Challenging the activists (pp. 26–41). London: The Institute of Economic Affairs.Google Scholar
  23. Littlechild, S. (2001). Competition and regulation in the UK Electricity Industry (with a brief look at California). Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 13(4), 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits to growth: A report to Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
  25. McCrum, D. (2016, May 5). Areva’s €7 billion shortfall and the limits of state aid. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  26. Morris, C., & Pehnt, M. (2016). Energy transition: The German energiewende. Berlin: Heinrich Böll Foundation.Google Scholar
  27. Navarro, C. (2008). Spain: Greening electricity while growing the economy. In W. M. Lafferty & A. Ruud (Eds.), Promoting sustainable electricity in Europe: Challenging the path dependence of dominant energy systems (pp. 130–158). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  28. Nordhaus, W. D. (2007). The Stern Review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature, 45(3), 686–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. The Observer. (2012, November 3). Huge scale of UK’s ‘dash for gas’ revealed.Google Scholar
  30. Pestel, R. (1989). Beyond the limits to growth: A report to the Club of Rome. New York: Universe Books.Google Scholar
  31. Pollitt, M. (2012). The role of policy in energy transitions: Lessons from the energy liberalisation era. Energy Policy, 50, 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ravago, M., Punongbayan, J., Brucal, A., & Roumasset, J. (2016, July 7). The role of power prices in structural transformation: Evidence from the Philippines. Working Paper, Energy Policy Development Program, School of Economics, University of the Philippines.Google Scholar
  33. Sari, R., & Soytas, U. (2007). The growth of income and energy consumption in six developing countries. Energy Policy, 35(2), 889–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smil, V. (2010). Energy transitions: History, requirements, and prospects. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.Google Scholar
  35. Stern, N. (2006). The Stern review report on economics of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Wethe, D. (2016, September 20). Mothballing the world’s fanciest oil rigs is a massive gamble. Bloomberg.Google Scholar
  37. World Nuclear Association (WNA). (2016, July). Nuclear power in France.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IESE Business SchoolUniversity of NavarraBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations